Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Processing of Household Waste by Residents of Griya Serpong Housing Complex, Serpong Sub-District, South Tangerang, Indonesia, in Compliance With Law Number 18 of 2008 and Law Number 32 of 2018 Suryani, Reni; Sa’adah, Nur; Lubis, Ilhamsyah
Sinergi International Journal of Law Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): November 2023
Publisher : Yayasan Sinergi Kawula Muda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61194/law.v1i3.95

Abstract

The Waste Management Law Number 18 of 2008 mandates waste management at various levels, including producers, communities, industrial areas, traditional markets, and malls. Local government administrations in regencies and cities need to create or revise regional regulations (Perda) and design a communal-based waste management masterplan. Until now, waste management has largely been centralized, with an open dumping system at the final disposal site, which ended in 2013. There are three forms of urban waste management: centralization, decentralization, and centralization-decentralization. An ideal waste management pattern is neither purely centralized nor decentralized, but rather a combination of both. Organic Waste Management Facilities (OWMF) are established at the source of dominant waste generation (initial stage), with a recycling system similar to City Waste Management Facilities (CWMF) to support and assist in marketing the products of the OWMF established by Joint Business Groups (KUB) formed by the community, known as the "self-sustaining concept." Addressing the waste problem requires an examination of the current waste management practices to identify areas where improvements and enhancements can be made, so that only waste that truly cannot be recycled ends up in the final disposal site, such as hazardous waste (B3) that is incinerated directly. This research aims to provide a solution to the waste disposal issue, which is largely centralized in Indonesia.
Juridical Normative Implications of Constitutional Court Decision 135/PUU XXII 2024 on Elections Walangitan, Samuel; Lubis, Ilhamsyah; Oktama, Yogi
Kajian Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan Vol 4 No 2 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Penerbit Goodwood

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/kihan.v4i2.6232

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the normative legal implications of Constitutional Court Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024 on the legal framework governing general elections and regional head elections in Indonesia, particularly in relation to the regulation of simultaneous elections and broader electoral reform. Research Methodology: This research employs a normative legal research method with a qualitative approach. The analysis is conducted through an examination of statutory regulations, Constitutional Court decisions, and relevant legal doctrines and scholarly literature in the fields of constitutional and election law. Results: The findings indicate that Constitutional Court Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024 has significant implications for the structure of electoral regulation in Indonesia. The decision redefines the legal relationship between general elections and regional head elections by emphasizing their institutional separation to ensure constitutional consistency and strengthen legal certainty within the electoral system. Conclusions: The study concludes that the Constitutional Court reaffirmed its constitutional role as the guardian of the Constitution by providing clear normative direction regarding the design and implementation of elections within the framework of constitutional democracy. Limitations: This study is limited to normative legal analysis and does not incorporate empirical or socio-political data concerning the practical implementation of the decision. Contributions: This research contributes to the development of constitutional and election law scholarship by clarifying the normative legal implications of a recent Constitutional Court decision and offering a conceptual foundation for future electoral reform and electoral law policy formulation in Indonesia.