Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan
Khusna, Tanwirotul
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Economics, Econometrics & Finance Energy Engineering Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Physics Transportation

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
PERBANDINGAN PRINCIPAL AXIS FACTORING DAN MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD DALAM MENENTUKAN FAKTOR DOMINAN YANG MEMPENGARUHI PEMBELAJARAN NAHWU SHOROF (STUDI KASUS PONDOK PESANTREN ROUDLOTUL MUTA’ALLIMIN PUTRI) Khusna, Tanwirotul; Akbarita, Rachmadania; Narendra, Risang
BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan Vol 15 No 4 (2021): BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan
Publisher : PATTIMURA UNIVERSITY

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (609.952 KB) | DOI: 10.30598/barekengvol15iss4pp785-796

Abstract

This study discusses the dominant factors that influence the success of learning nahwu shorof at the Roudlotul Mutaalimin Islamic Boarding School for the daughter of Minggirsari Village. Determining the dominant factor is done to maximize the quality of education in the boarding school, so that the interest of prospective students is increasing. In this study, two extraction methods were compared, namely the Principal Axis Factoring and Maximum Likelihood methods. There are 13 variables that affect the success of nahwu shorof learning, namely the natural environment (P1), social environment (P23), curriculum (P49), madrasa program (P1012), facilities and facilities (P1315), teaching staff (P1619), condition of physiological (P2021), condition of the five senses (P22), interest in learning (P2325), intelligence of students (P26), student talent (P27), motivation of students (P28), cognitive ability (P2930). The purpose of this study, namely to determine the most appropriate extraction method used in the analysis. The result of this study is the Maximum Likelihood method which is more appropriate than the Principal Axis Factoring method, because it has a smaller RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) value.
Co-Authors Narendra, Risang Rachmadania Akbarita