Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.116
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Buana Ilmu Justisi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
Ade Maman Suherman
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Peran Strategis Pengacara Negara dalam Penanganan Kasus Korupsi Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 dalam Kerangka Negara Hukum Yashinta Irenne Marianna; Ade Maman Suherman; Tri Setiady
Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Januari: Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/humif.v2i1.996

Abstract

The role of State Attorneys (Jaksa Pengacara Negara, JPN) is vital in recovering state assets lost due to corruption, aligning with the principles of Indonesia’s legal state (Rechtsstaat). This study examines JPN's authority under Law No. 31 of 1999, emphasizing its dual role in civil and administrative litigation. Using a normative juridical approach, the research analyzes legal frameworks and conceptual perspectives on JPN’s functions. The findings indicate JPN’s strategic position in representing the state, not only in civil lawsuits but also in non-litigation processes for recovering state financial losses. Challenges such as limited human resources, inter-agency coordination, and protracted case resolutions hinder optimal performance. The research suggests reinforcing the institutional capacity of JPN through targeted training and promoting synergy with related agencies, such as the KPK and police. Enhancing legal competence and procedural efficiency are critical to meeting public expectations for justice and transparency in handling corruption cases.
Implikasi Hukum Pidana Penyalahgunaan Data Pribadi Kasus Dharma Pongrekun Pilkada Jakarta Berdasarkan Teori Penegakan Hukum Endah Astuti; Ade Maman Suherman; Tri Setiady
Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Januari: Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/humif.v2i1.997

Abstract

This study examines the legal implications of personal data misuse during the 2024 Jakarta gubernatorial election involving Dharma Pongrekun. The research highlights systemic challenges in safeguarding data privacy in Indonesia, particularly in electoral contexts. Employing a normative juridical method, the study focuses on the application of the Personal Data Protection Law (UU PDP) and its enforcement mechanisms. Findings reveal that unauthorized use of voter data, such as identity theft, poses a severe threat to electoral integrity and public trust. The lack of coordination among regulatory bodies, combined with insufficient public awareness, exacerbates the issue. The study emphasizes the urgent need for comprehensive reforms, including stricter law enforcement, increased institutional accountability, and improved technological infrastructure. Furthermore, the findings advocate for public education on the importance of data privacy, especially in democratic processes. These measures aim to bolster electoral transparency, protect individual rights, and ensure justice in cases of data misuse. The research provides a valuable contribution to discussions on data protection and electoral governance in Indonesia. Strengthening the enforcement of the UU PDP is crucial to addressing these challenges and fostering trust in both the legal system and democratic processes.
TINJAUAN VIKTIMOLOGIS TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN KORBAN KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA YANG MENGAKIBATKAN MATINYA KORBAN DARI PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA Taryadi; Ade Maman Suherman; Tri Setiady
BUANA ILMU Vol 9 No 1 (2024): Buana Ilmu
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36805/bi.v9i1.8193

Abstract

Negara Indonesia adalah negara hukum yang menjungjung tinggi hak asasi manusia, hal ini dapat terlihat bagaimana Negara Indonesia memberikan jaminan hukum terhadap pengakuan dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia yang terdapat dalam UndangUndang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Pasal 28 huruf A hingga Pasal 28 huruf J dan secara lebih khusus diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 39 tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia. Hak Asasi Manusia adalah hak dasar dari setiap warga negara yang melekat pada individu sejak ia lahir secara kodrat yang diberikan langsung oleh Tuhan Yang Maha Esa yang tidak dirampas dan dicabut keberadaannya dan wajib dihormati, dijunjung tinggi, dan dilindungi oleh negara, hukum, pemerintah, dan setiap orang demi kehormatan dan perlindungan harkat martabat manusia.
LEGAL PROTECTION FOR INFRINGEMENT OF UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THE REGISTERED TRADEMARK SARAH GAJAH DUDUK Aditya Yunianto; Ade Maman Suherman; Tri Setiady; Wiwin Triyunarti
Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36805/2cwwn189

Abstract

 PT. Gajah Duduk is one of the largest sarong manufacturing companies in Indonesia. In carrying out its business activities, PT. Gajah Duduk uses a distinctive symbol—commonly referred to as a trademark—on its products to make them recognizable to the public. This trademark has been officially registered with the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. However, over time, PT. Prisma Abadi Jaya was found to have produced sarongs bearing a mark that closely resembled the registered Gajah Duduk trademark. Moreover, the goods in question fall under the same class of goods for which PT. Gajah Duduk holds its trademark rights. This action clearly violates statutory provisions and causes harm to the legitimate trademark holder. In response, PT. Gajah Duduk filed a lawsuit to cancel the trademark allegedly used without authorization by the other party. Given this context, it is essential to further examine the legal protection of registered trademarks in Indonesia, how unauthorized use of trademarks applies in the case of the Gajah Duduk sarong, and how PT. Gajah Duduk’s trademark rights are protected against PT. Prisma Abadi Jaya. In addition, a comparative analysis with trademark protection systems in other countries will also be discussed. This research employs a normative-juridical method, which involves analysis based on legal theories, expert opinions, legal literature, and applicable regulations. The findings of this study indicate that legal protection for trademarks in Indonesia has been established through enacted legislation and other relevant regulatory frameworks.  
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF COPYRIGHT DISPUTE RESOLUTION THROUGH ARBITRATION BETWEEN INDONESIA AND THE UNITED KINGDOM Ali Abdulah; Ade Maman Suherman; Tri Setiady; Wiwin Triyunarti
Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36805/0wbfpq39

Abstract

Settling copyright disputes through arbitration is an out-of-court alternative that is considered more efficient, faster, and maintains the confidentiality of the parties' business. Indonesia, through Law No. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright and Law No. 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration, has opened up space for non-litigation copyright dispute resolution. Meanwhile, the United Kingdom with its common law system has developed a more mature arbitration mechanism through the Arbitration Act 1996 and the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. This article aims to comparatively analyze the arbitration system in resolving copyright disputes in Indonesia and the United Kingdom. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory, conceptual, and comparative approach. The results of the study indicate that although both countries recognize arbitration as a dispute resolution forum, the United Kingdom has a more advanced legal infrastructure, international arbitration institutions, and practices than Indonesia. This study recommends strengthening copyright arbitration in Indonesia by adopting best practices from the UK, particularly regarding the specialization of IP arbitrators and the effectiveness of the enforcement of arbitral awards.
THE ROLE OF THE WEST JAVA PROVINCE DPRD IN SUPERVISION Dea Eka Rizaldi; Ade Maman Suherman; Tri Setiady; Wiwin Triyunarti
Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36805/hjrre111

Abstract

The context of West Java Province is interesting to study in depthbecause its complex characteristics in terms of population,budget allocation, and diversity of sectoral issues require a stronger and more adaptive oversight mechanismthan other regions. To achievethese objectives, this study will use a comparative qualitative research designand document analysis, in-depth interviews, and case studies. Overall, the DPRD oversight mechanism in Indonesia has a fairlycomplete set of normative instruments, but its effectiveness is still influenced by internal factorssuch as the political and regulatory capacity of council members, as well as external factorssuch as executive transparency and public participation. Therefore, increasing legislative professionalism and inter-institutional synergy is animportant agenda for strengthening local government accountability. Finally, public participation and local media play a reinforcing role in thelegislative oversight mechanism. Support from civil society, non-governmental organizations(NGOs), and regional media can increase public pressurefor the DPRD to carry out its control function more firmly and openly. A responsive public complaint mechanismcan also be an effective channel foridentifying policy irregularities at the local level. However, several reinforcing factors such as budget transparency, the role of external (BPK) andinternal audits, as well as public and media participation can encourage improvements in thequality of oversight. In the context of West Java, which is highly complexand covers a large area, DPRD oversight has a positive influence onthe accountability of regional heads, although there is still a gap between regulatory normsand implementation practices in the field.   Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
Co-Authors Aditya Yunianto Ali Abdulah Dea Eka Rizaldi Endah Astuti Taryadi tri setiady Wiwin Triyunarti Yashinta Irenne Marianna