Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PENGATURAN PERAMPASAN ASET SEBAGAI UPAYA PENGEMBALIAN KERUGIAN NEGARA Suci, Suci Fitriani Hafsah; Zairani Lisi, Ivan; Wati, Agustina
JOURNAL IURIS SCIENTIA Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): JOURNAL IURIS SCIENTIA
Publisher : Yayasan Merassa Indonesia Publikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62263/jis.v3i1.53

Abstract

Corruption is a criminal act that aims to enrich a person or corporation which results in state financial losses. In article 2 paragraph (1) it is stated that the perpetrator of a criminal offense can be sentenced to imprisonment and/or a fine of a predetermined amount, but not only that, the judge can also impose additional punishment in the form of replacement money which was previously regulated in article 34 of Law Number 3 1971 and Article 18 paragraph (1) letter b of Law number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption. However, according to the data the author obtained from ICW, it is stated that the monetary compensation penalty is not enough to recover the losses suffered by the state. So, to recover state losses in a short time, provisions are needed that regulate policies regarding confiscation of assets without punishment. The concept of asset confiscation itself consists of 2 methods, namely, in personam and in rem. Confiscation of assets by means of in personam is a law enforcement action that focuses on the defendant personally for the criminal act he committed through applicable legal procedures. The in personam method must be carried out based on a valid decision from the criminal court, in this case the prosecutor is required to be able to prove that the assets to be confiscated are the result of a criminal act. Meanwhile, confiscation by means of in rem or also called civil for-feiture focuses more on assets and not on the perpetrator of the crime, so this method does not require a judge's decision to execute the assets of the perpetrator of the crime. However, prosecutors and executors still need to ensure that the assets to be confiscated are part of a criminal act. Tindak pidana korupsi adalah suatu tindak pidana yang bertujuan untuk memperkaya seseorang atau korporasi yang mengakibatkan kerugian keuangan negara. Dalam pasal 2 ayat (1) disebutkan bahwa pelaku tindak pidana dapat dijatuhi hukuman pidana penjara dan/atau denda dengan nominal yang telah ditentukan, tetapi tidak hanya itu hakim juga dapat menjatuhkan hukuman tambahan berupa uang pengganti yang sebelumnya telah diatur dalam pasal 34 UU Nomor 3 Tahun 1971 dan Pasal 18 ayat (1) huruf b UU nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Korupsi. Akan tetapi menurut data yang penulis dapatkan dari ICW menyebutkan bahwa hukuman uang pengganti belum cukup untuk memulihkan kerugian yang diderita oleh negara. Maka untuk memulihkan kerugian negara dengan tempo yang singkat diperlukan ketentuan yang mengatur kebijakan mengenai perampasan asset tanpa pemidanaan. Konsep perampasan asset sendiri terdiri dari 2 cara yaitu, secara in personam dan secara in rem. Perampasan asset dengan cara in personam merupakan sebuah Tindakan penegakan hukum yang berfokus pada terdakwa secara personal atas tindak pidana yang dilakukannya melalui prosedur hukum yang berlaku. Cara in personam harus dilakukan berdasarkan putusan yang sah dari peradilan pidana, dalam hal ini jaksa dituntut untuk dapat membuktikan bahwa asset yang akan dirampas merupakan hasil dari suatu tindak pidana. Sedangkan perasampasan dengan cara in rem atau juga disebut dengan civil forfeiture lebih berfokus pada asset bukan pada pelaku tindak pidana, maka dengan cara ini tidak memerlukan putusan hakim untuk mengeksekusi asset pelaku tindak pidana tersebut. Namun jaksa dan eksekutor tetap perlu memastikan bahwa asset yang akan dirampas merupakan bagian dari tindak pidana.
Pengajuan Kasasi Tindak Pidana Ringan (Studi Relaas Pemberitahuan Putusan Banding Nomor 164/Pid/2019/PT Smr) Norhani, Ulfah; Zairani Lisi, Ivan; Gusta Andini, Orin
Jurnal Risalah Hukum Vol 18 No 2 (2022): Volume 18, Nomor 2, Desember 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v18i2.636

Abstract

Cassation Law is the right of the defendant or public prosecutor not to accept the court's decision. Cases categorized as minor crimes are cases where the threat of a criminal verdict is a maximum of 3 months of confinement/imprisonment and a fine, one of which is a criminal act of using land without permission. The purpose of this study is to review and analyze, first, the legal arrangements for filing appeals according to SEMA No. 8 of 2011 against cases of minor criminal acts of using land without permission Decision Number 164 / Pid / 2019 / PT Smr and legal considerations of the Bailiff of the Samarinda District Court in issuing a notice of appeal decision No. 164 / Pid / 2019 / PT Smr which explains that the defendant can apply for cassation. The results showed that the legal arrangement for filing an appeal according to SEMA No. 8 of 2011 against cases of minor criminal acts of using land without permission Decision Number 164 / Pid / 2019 / PT Smr is a case that is not eligible to be appealed because the criminal verdict falls on qualifications that are threatened with imprisonment under 1 (one) year. Legal considerations for the issuance of a notice of appeal decision No. 164/Pid/2019/PT Smr, which explains that the defendant can apply for an appeal based on the Bailiff being obliged to convey the Right of a Defendant because the defendant has the right to file an appeal and in Article 205 of the Criminal Procedure Code regarding the examination of minor crimes there is no specific mention of the prohibition of filing appeals.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana terhadap Pelaku Penjualan Deepfake Porn di Media Sosial X Rachmat Sucipto, Kevin; Zairani Lisi, Ivan; Gusta Andini, Orin
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The absence of specific legislation regulating Artificial Intelligence has resulted in the lack of a special criminal offense qualification that can serve as a legal basis for imposing criminal liability on perpetrators. This condition creates a legal dilemma when the Principle of Legality is confronted with criminal acts such as the sale of Deepfake Porn on the social media platform X, which utilizes Artificial Intelligence-based technology. This research aims to examine the relevant criminal offense qualifications applicable to such acts and determine the appropriate statutory provisions for imposing criminal liability on perpetrators. The research employs a doctrinal legal research method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The findings indicate that the Cybercrime Criminal Offense Qualification is more relevant than the Pornography Criminal Offense Qualification due to the principle of lex consumen derogat legi consumte, based on the locus and characteristics of the Deepfake Porn sale. Perpetrators may be held criminally liable with a maximum imprisonment sentence of 16 years and/or a maximum fine of sixteen billion Rupiah pursuant to the criminal provisions of Article 35 in conjunction with Article 51 paragraph (1) of Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law) as the primary provision, along with other criminal provisions from the amendments to the ITE Law (Law Number 19 of 2016 and Law Number 1 of 2024), Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection, and Law Number 44 of 2008 concerning Pornography.