Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Risalah Hukum Jurnal As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Zairani Lisi, Ivan
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Pengajuan Kasasi Tindak Pidana Ringan (Studi Relaas Pemberitahuan Putusan Banding Nomor 164/Pid/2019/PT Smr) Norhani, Ulfah; Zairani Lisi, Ivan; Gusta Andini, Orin
Jurnal Risalah Hukum Vol 18 No 2 (2022): Volume 18, Nomor 2, Desember 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v18i2.636

Abstract

Cassation Law is the right of the defendant or public prosecutor not to accept the court's decision. Cases categorized as minor crimes are cases where the threat of a criminal verdict is a maximum of 3 months of confinement/imprisonment and a fine, one of which is a criminal act of using land without permission. The purpose of this study is to review and analyze, first, the legal arrangements for filing appeals according to SEMA No. 8 of 2011 against cases of minor criminal acts of using land without permission Decision Number 164 / Pid / 2019 / PT Smr and legal considerations of the Bailiff of the Samarinda District Court in issuing a notice of appeal decision No. 164 / Pid / 2019 / PT Smr which explains that the defendant can apply for cassation. The results showed that the legal arrangement for filing an appeal according to SEMA No. 8 of 2011 against cases of minor criminal acts of using land without permission Decision Number 164 / Pid / 2019 / PT Smr is a case that is not eligible to be appealed because the criminal verdict falls on qualifications that are threatened with imprisonment under 1 (one) year. Legal considerations for the issuance of a notice of appeal decision No. 164/Pid/2019/PT Smr, which explains that the defendant can apply for an appeal based on the Bailiff being obliged to convey the Right of a Defendant because the defendant has the right to file an appeal and in Article 205 of the Criminal Procedure Code regarding the examination of minor crimes there is no specific mention of the prohibition of filing appeals.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana terhadap Pelaku Penjualan Deepfake Porn di Media Sosial X Rachmat Sucipto, Kevin; Zairani Lisi, Ivan; Gusta Andini, Orin
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The absence of specific legislation regulating Artificial Intelligence has resulted in the lack of a special criminal offense qualification that can serve as a legal basis for imposing criminal liability on perpetrators. This condition creates a legal dilemma when the Principle of Legality is confronted with criminal acts such as the sale of Deepfake Porn on the social media platform X, which utilizes Artificial Intelligence-based technology. This research aims to examine the relevant criminal offense qualifications applicable to such acts and determine the appropriate statutory provisions for imposing criminal liability on perpetrators. The research employs a doctrinal legal research method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The findings indicate that the Cybercrime Criminal Offense Qualification is more relevant than the Pornography Criminal Offense Qualification due to the principle of lex consumen derogat legi consumte, based on the locus and characteristics of the Deepfake Porn sale. Perpetrators may be held criminally liable with a maximum imprisonment sentence of 16 years and/or a maximum fine of sixteen billion Rupiah pursuant to the criminal provisions of Article 35 in conjunction with Article 51 paragraph (1) of Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law) as the primary provision, along with other criminal provisions from the amendments to the ITE Law (Law Number 19 of 2016 and Law Number 1 of 2024), Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection, and Law Number 44 of 2008 concerning Pornography.
Co-Authors Gusta Andini, Orin Norhani, Ulfah Rachmat Sucipto, Kevin