Agustin Agustin
Bagian Farmasetika Fakultas Farmasi Universitas Airlangga Surabaya

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

RISK FACTORS RELATE OF OVARIAN CANCER IN WOMEN : LITERATURE REVIEW Agustin Agustin; Yanti Hermayanti; Ida Maryati; Henny Suzanna Mediani
Journal of Maternity Care and Reproductive Health Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Journal of Maternity Care and Reproductive Health
Publisher : Ikatan Perawat Maternitas Indonesia Provinsi Jawa Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36780/jmcrh.v4i1.150

Abstract

Every woman is at risk for ovarian cancer. Until now, ovarian cancer is the 3rd of the 10 most common cancers in women. If exposed, it can cause complex problems until death occurs. For that every woman needs to be aware of this disease by recognizing the risk factors. The purpose of this study is to explore these various factors through a review of related literature through searches of thedatabases Pubmed, Science Direct, Willey, and Cambrige with a total of 10 analysis articles originating from America, China, Taiwan, Europe, Alaska, England and Finland. By searching for articles according to the inclusion criteria, namely full text, published in 2010 - 2020, articles having DOIs, experimental research designs and case studies, using the keywords risk factor and ovarian cancer. The results obtained 602 articles, and 10 articles describing the incidence of ovarian cancer were proven to be related to an imbalance of FSH, estrogen and progesterone hormones, the use of cosmetic products on the face and genetalia containing asbestos, and a family history of cancer. Based on these results, women should immediately get checked out if there are hormonal disorders such as disrupted menstrual cycles, and not use cosmetic products that contain asbestos, and observe symptoms from an early age if the family has had ovarian cancer or breast cancer. Conclusion: by knowing the risk factors, each woman can assess the risk factors that are present in her, so that she can do early detection of ovarian cancer and immediately get therapy if ovarian cancer is found quickly and precisely This research can be continued by focusing more research on factors of hormonal and non-hormonal contraceptive use. 
Perspektif Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Atas Kerugian Keuangan Negara dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Munsen Bona Pakpahan; Fajar Fajar; Agustin Agustin
Federalisme: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Federalisme : Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/federalisme.v1i4.323

Abstract

The application of main and additional criminal witnesses in the PTPK Law has become firm with the existence of legal norms for the return of state financial losses that do not eliminate the criminalization of the perpetrators of criminal acts but only factors that alleviate punishment. This is important so that there is no disparity in punishment. And likewise punish paying restitution if the act is committed jointly, so that a sense of justice occurs,The research method used is normative juridical. Which type of data used is primair legal material obtained from all publications on law, literature that is not an official document. Publications about the law include, among others, the internet, textbooks, law journals, articles, comments, court regulations and other sources; The types of criminal sanctions in the PTPK Law, namely in the form of principal punishment and additional punishment in the form of restitution, are closely related. Aspects of the amount of state financial losses, aspects of the perpetrator's guilt, aspects of the benefits obtained by the perpetrator, the impact caused by the perpetrator and the return of losses made by the perpetrator. Such is the case in imposing additional punishment in the form of paying restitution. In the PTPK Law, the amount of restitution is interpreted as “not merely assessing state financial losses, but assessing how much money is actually received by the perpetrator”, so that the imposition of restitution is in accordance with objective and proportional principles. Likewise, the imposition of restitution in the case of corruption crimes committed jointly and tried simultaneously, the additional restitution cannot be imposed jointly.