Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Unisia Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia
Richo Andi Wibowo
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Pelaksanaan Peraturan Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Penanggulangan Bencana Gunung Api Merapi Heribertus Jaka Triyana; Richo Andi Wibowo
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Edisi Khusus, November 2011
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (404.031 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16167

Abstract

This paper describes the implementation of the public participation rule in the disaster management of Merapi volcano. The regulation desires for a shift of paradigm from centralized disaster management to participative disaster management. This study shows the government has not shifted from the old paradigm of centralized disaster management.  Tulisan ini menggambarkan pelaksanaan aturan partisipasi masyarakat dalam penanggulangan bencana gunung api Merapi. Peraturan menginginkan pergeseran paradigma penanggulangan bencana dari sentralistik ke penanggulangan bencana yang partisipatoris. Penelitian ini menunjukkan Pemerintah belum sepenuhnya beralih dari paradigma penanggulangan bencana sentralistis.
Embodiment Concept Of Good Governance as Principle in Public Procurement Richo Andi Wibowo
Unisia No. 76: Tahun XXXIV Triwulan I 2012
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/unisia.vol34.iss76.art2

Abstract

Banyak pihak meyakini good governance adalah meta-konsep yang dapat diimplementasikan pada seluruh level. Tulisan ini berupaya membuktikan hal tersebut dengan meninjau bagaimanakah pembadanan good governance dari "konsep" menjadi "asas", khususnya di sistem pengadaan barang/jasa. Untuk itu, tulisan ini akan mengelaborasi konsep dan sejarah good governance, kemudian menunjukkan bagaimana konsep tersebut terserap dan bekerja sebagai asas. Tulisan ini akhirnya berkesimpulan bahwa good governance adalah konsep yang "avant la lettre", yang mana konsep tersebut telah terbadankan secara utuh sebagai asas good governance, namun terbadankan dengan beberapa modifikasi sebagai asas di sistem pengadaan barang dan jasa. Kata kunci: Konsep, Asas, Sejarah, Good Governance, Pengadaan Barang/Jasa  
Politisasi Birokrasi - Bantuan Sosial dan Gugatan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum sebagai Sengketa Pemilu Richo Andi Wibowo
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 5 SEPTEMBER 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This paper discusses cases of tort committed by government agencies/officials intertwined with election issues. This article raises three questions: by examining court decisions on the so-called Acting Regional Head case, has the tort lawsuit been effective in preventing the politicization of the bureaucracy? Why the previous case had occurred, but no tort lawsuit happened on the politicization of government social assistance?; What needs to be done to make the tort lawsuits more effective in preventing the politicization of bureaucracy and budgets in the future elections? This research examines court decisions and social phenomena with a legal theory as a tool of analysis. This paper concludes that the quality of ratio decidendi and dictum of the Acting Regional Head case were poor; the lawsuit has not been effective in preventing bureaucratic politicization. Moreover, there are several reasons on why nobody has sued tort on the context of politicization of government social assistance: limited time to submit petition; long and bureaucratic tort dispute process; court's narrow interpretation on "legal standing" and "plaintiff's losses"; also unpleasant experience with the results of the previous case. Four suggestions are provided to enhance the effectiveness of the tort conducted by the government.
Co-Authors Heribertus Jaka Triyana