Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.037
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Jatiswara International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC)
Ahmad Bardi
Faculty Of Law, Nahdlatul Wathan University Of Mataram, Lombok, Indonesia
Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Pengaturan Kualifikasi Terorisme Dalam Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Terorisme Dan Perbandingannya Dengan Negara Lain Bardi, Ahmad
JATISWARA Vol. 38 No. 1 (2023): Jatiswara
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jtsw.v38i1.484

Abstract

Terorisme merupakan kejahatan Internasional. Secara historis, terorisme terjadi sejak tahun 1880 dan terus berkembang sampai saat ini. Kualifikasi terorisme sampai saat ini belum ada yang dapat diterima secara Universal, sehingga masing-masing Negara memiliki pandangan yang berbeda-beda tentang terorisme yang diatur dalam peraturan perundang-undangannya. Secara normatif kualifikasi terorisme di Indonesia telah diatur dalam undang-undang pemberantasan tindak pidana terorisme yaitu terorisme adalah perbuatan yang didasarkan pada motif ideologi, politik atau gangguan keamanan. Permasalahan yang dianalisis dalam penelitian ini adalah tentang perbandingan kualifikasi terorisme Indonesia dengan Negara-negara lain serta konsekwensi yuridisnya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konsep dan pendekatan perbandingan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahawa pengaturan kualifikasi terorisme dalam Undang-undang No 5 Tahun 2018 adalah kejahatan yang didasarkan pada motif ideologi, politik atau gangguan keamanan, berbeda dengan undang-undang pemberantasan tindak pidana terorisme di Negara-negara lain yaitu undang-undang keamanan nasional Malaysia, Negara-negara Liga Arab, Undang-undang Anti Terorisme Amerika Serikat dan undang-undang Anti Terorisme di Inggris dan Negara Uni Eropa pengaturan kualifikasi terorisme tidak didasarkan pada motif ideologi, politik atau gangguan keamanan. Pengaturan kualifikasi terorisme yang diatur dalam Undang-undang No 5 Tahun 2018 secara yuridis tidak memiliki konsekwensi terhadap delik terorisme karena motif ideologi, politik atau gangguan keamanan tidak termasuk sebagai unsur-unsur tindak pidana terorisme.
The Concept of Terrorism and Implementation of the Principles of Criminalization in the Law on the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Terrorism Bardi, Ahmad; Nurhayani
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences Vol. 2 No. 6 (2021): December 2021
Publisher : CV. Inara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51601/ijersc.v2i6.221

Abstract

Terrorism is one of the crimes that greatly disturbs the security of the life of the nation and state. Terrorism is not only a problem for the Indonesian people, but has become an international problem. The eradication of criminal acts of terrorism in Indonesia is carried out based on Law Number 5 of 2018 in conjunction with Law Number 15 of 2003. The problem that becomes the object of research is the concept of terrorism and the implementation of criminalization principles in the law on eradicating criminal acts of terrorism. The type of research used is normative legal research with a statute approach, conceptual approach, historical approach, and comparative approach. The results of research in the law on eradicating criminal acts of terrorism have limited the definition of terrorism by including ideological, political and security disturbance motives, in contrast to other countries which on average do not include motives in the definition of terrorism. The principles of criminalization in the preparation of the law on the eradication of criminal acts of terrorism have not been fully fulfilled, namely about avoiding the formulation of vague and general articles.
Certainty of Legal Protection for Justice Collaborators in Indonesia Nurhayani, Nurhayani; Bardi, Ahmad
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences Vol. 3 No. 6 (2022): December 2022
Publisher : CV. Inara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51601/ijersc.v3i6.539

Abstract

The justice collaborator system is a new system in criminal procedural law in Indonesia. The legal basis for justice collaborators is currently still regulated in Law No. Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 31 of 2014 concerning amendments to Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims. The issues being analyzed are legal certainty and forms of legal protection. to justice collaborators. The research method used is normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of the study show that the legal sources of Justice collaborators are currently not regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code, but are still regulated in one law with reporting witnesses and victim witnesses. The form of protection given to perpetrator witnesses (justice collaborators) who have status as suspects or defendants is protection for personal security, family and property, free from threats, giving statements without pressure, getting translators, free from ensnaring questions, getting information about progress of the case, obtain information regarding court decisions, obtain information in terms of the convict being released, keep his identity confidential, obtain a new identity, obtain temporary residence, obtain a new residence, obtain reimbursement of transportation costs as needed, obtain legal advice, obtain temporary living expenses assistance until the Protection deadline expires; and/or receive assistance. Meanwhile, justice collaborators whose status as convicts are conditional release, additional remissions and the rights of other convicts.
Legal Aspect Setting The Definition Of Terrorism In Law No. 5 Of 2018 Concerning Amendments To Law No. 15 Of 2003 Concerning Eradication Of Criminal Acts Of Terrorism Bardi, Ahmad
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): February 2023
Publisher : CV. Inara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51601/ijersc.v4i1.599

Abstract

Terrorism is a very worrying crime because its development in Indonesia and in other countries is increasing, both in quality and quantity, so that terrorism is not only an Indonesian problem but an international problem. One of the results of changes in the law on combating terrorism in Indonesia is the addition of Article 1 by including restrictions on the qualification of terrorism that were not previously regulated in the law on combating terrorism. This raises its own problems, namely there is no synchronization between the qualification of terrorism and the crime of terrorism, the problem to be examined and analyzed in this study is how the urgency of setting the definition of terrorism in Law No. 5 of 2018 and its comparison with other countries and how the juridical consequences of the inclusion of motives in the definition of terrorism?. The research method used to analyze the problem is to use the normative legal research method with the approach of legislation, concepts and methods of comparison. The results showed that the qualification of terrorism in Law No. 5 of 2018 that terrorism is a crime that depends on a motive, namely ideological, political or security interference motives. It is quite different from the qualification of terrorism in some countries , that other countries that have laws combating the criminal act of terrorism do not regulate the qualification of terrorism and the motives of terrorism, but only regulate the offenses of terrorism and its elements. The regulation of terrorism motives in Law No. 5 of 2018 is ineffective because it is not included as elements of terrorism crimes and even causes multi-interpretations because there is no further explanation of the limits of ideological, political and security interference motives.
Co-Authors Bq. Aula Permata Mulia Eernawati, Eernawati Nurhayani Nurhayani nurhayani