Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

EXECUTION OF DECISIONS OF THE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COURT WITH PERMANENT LEGAL FORCE (INKRACHT) Ritonga, Daniel; Fitrian, Achmad; Hendro, Gatut
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES Vol. 1 No. 3 (2022): JULY
Publisher : Transpublika Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (243.469 KB) | DOI: 10.55047/polri.v1i3.249

Abstract

The research will discuss the execution of industrial relations court decisions with permanent legal force, aiming to reveal and analyze how the process of implementing industrial relations court decisions with permanent legal force and what factors hinder the execution of industrial relations court decisions with permanent legal force. This is a literature study using normative legal research. The data collected by library research, namely by the study of written information about the law that comes from various sources and is widely published and is needed in normative legal research. The findings highlight that the procedure for the execution of industrial relations court decisions that have permanent legal force has not been explicitly regulated in Law Number 2 of 2004 concerning Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement. However, Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement confirms that the Industrial Relations Court applies procedural law applicable to civil procedural law within the General Courts as stated in Article 57 of Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement. The lack of good faith on the part of the losing party to voluntarily carry out their obligations as stated in the verdict is one of the factors impeding the execution of the Industrial Relations Court's decision, which has permanent legal force. In addition, it is difficult for the winning party, in this case the workers, to determine which company assets can be executed against the losing party, and the execution cost is too high for the court to issue an execution order.
Penegakan Hukum Monopoli Persaingan Usaha dalam Tender Proyek Kerjasama Pemerintah dengan Badan Usaha (KPBU) Yudhatama Fitriargo, Bambang; Sriwidodo, Joko; Hendro, Gatut
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Vol. 3 No. 01 (2022): Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains
Publisher : CV. Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jiss.v3i01.526

Abstract

Presiden Republik Indonesia menetapkan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 38 Tahun 2015 tentang Kerjasama Pemerintah Dengan Badan Usaha Dalam Penyediaan Infrastruktur yang bertujuan untuk Mencukupi kebutuhan pendanaan secara berkelanjutan dalam Penyediaan Infrastruktur melalui pengerahan dana swasta. Namun dengan adanya Perpres tersebut menyebabkan adanya celah hukum bagi BUMN/BUMD untuk melakukan praktik persaingan usaha tidak sehat. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yang bersifat yuridis normatif dengan obyek yang diteliti adalah asas-asas hukum dan kaidah-kaidah hukum yang masih berlaku namun juga didukung dengan data empiris. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan larangan monopoli persaingan usaha dalam tender proyek KPBU yaitu adanya larangan tindakan post bidding yang merupakan tindakan mengubah, menambah, mengganti dan/atau mengurangi dokumen pengadaan dan/atau dokumen penawaran setelah batas akhir yang telah ditetapkan masih terjadi. Dalam hal ini KPPU tidak mengatur tentang post bidding hanya saja KPPU dapat memutuskan tindakan post biding yang terjadi dalam kerjasama pemerintah dan badan usaha terkait pengadaan barang dan jasa apabila melakukan persekongkolan tender.