Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Personal Data Protection in Telemedicine: Comparison of Indonesian and European Union Law Jannah, Miftahul; Amboro, F. Yudhi Priyo; Shahrullah, Rina
Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Vol 8 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/jlpt.v8i2.8827

Telemedicine allows patients to receive remote medical consultation, diagnosis, and treatment through a digital platform. However, with the development of telemedicine, personal data protection has become one of the main concerns. This research aims to compare the regulation of personal data protection in telemedicine services in Indonesia and the European Union. The type of research in this scientific article is Normative Juridical Research with a comparative legal approach. The data sources obtained in this paper are primary data and secondary data. The data collection method is a literature study. The data analysis method in this paper uses a qualitative approach. The results show that personal data protection in Indonesia is regulated by Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection (PDP Law). While in the European Union, Personal Data Protection is regulated in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) which regulates the collection and use of personal data by organizations. Some similarities in personal data protection in both telemedicine in Indonesia and in the European Union are that the same consent requires telemedicine providers to obtain clear and explicit consent from patients. Both telemedicine providers must not disclose the patient's personal data to third parties without the patient's consent. Telemedicine providers to implement security measures to protect patient personal data. Both Indonesia and the European Union give patients the right to access, correct, delete, and limit the use of their personal data

The Compliance Of Autonomous Weapons To International Humanitarian Law: Question Of Law And Question Of Fact Shahrullah, Rina; Samsu Saputra, Muhammad
Wacana Hukum Vol 28 No 2 (2022): February 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Slamet Riyadi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33061/wh.v28i1.6689

International Humanitarian Law (IHL) sets the rules to prevent human from doing excessive damages upon humanity in the time of war or armed conflicts. However, a new weapon which is called autonomous weapons rises a serious concern today because it can search, detect, identify, select, track and engage targets without human interventions. This study aims to clarify which weapons are regarded as “autonomous” today in order to find out whether the present autonomous weapons comply the IHL principles. This study adopts normative legal research. The data types used is based on secondary data which consist of Primary legal materials, namely the Geneva Convention 1949 and its Additional Protocols. In addition, secondary legal materials are used to support the primary legal materials are obtained from articles and books. The data is collected through library research and analyzed by using a qualitative-descriptive approach. It finds that a weapon system which limits human control and intervention, is not automatically classified as an autonomous weapon due to the level of human and AI engagement in the weapon. The use of autonomous weapon in armed conflicts does not entirely fulfill the principles of IHL, particularly a fully autonomous weapon because it will never satisfy the principle of distinction, proportionality, the prohibition of attack against those hors de combat and humanity.

Personal Data Protection in Telemedicine: Comparison of Indonesian and European Union Law Jannah, Miftahul; Amboro, F. Yudhi Priyo; Shahrullah, Rina
Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Vol 8 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/jlpt.v8i2.8827

Telemedicine allows patients to receive remote medical consultation, diagnosis, and treatment through a digital platform. However, with the development of telemedicine, personal data protection has become one of the main concerns. This research aims to compare the regulation of personal data protection in telemedicine services in Indonesia and the European Union. The type of research in this scientific article is Normative Juridical Research with a comparative legal approach. The data sources obtained in this paper are primary data and secondary data. The data collection method is a literature study. The data analysis method in this paper uses a qualitative approach. The results show that personal data protection in Indonesia is regulated by Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection (PDP Law). While in the European Union, Personal Data Protection is regulated in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) which regulates the collection and use of personal data by organizations. Some similarities in personal data protection in both telemedicine in Indonesia and in the European Union are that the same consent requires telemedicine providers to obtain clear and explicit consent from patients. Both telemedicine providers must not disclose the patient's personal data to third parties without the patient's consent. Telemedicine providers to implement security measures to protect patient personal data. Both Indonesia and the European Union give patients the right to access, correct, delete, and limit the use of their personal data

The Algorithmic Dilemma: Online Gambling Blocking and Data Privacy in Indonesia's E-Government Atmaja, Vanessa Riarta; Shahrullah, Rina; Situmeang, Ampuan
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 26 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2026.26.1.17845

The rapid proliferation of online gambling in Indonesia has prompted the Ministry of Communication and Informatics to implement large-scale algorithmic blocking measures, creating a critical tension between cybersecurity enforcement and citizen data protection. This study investigates the unintended consequences of these automated blocking mechanisms on government digital infrastructure that hosts personal data. Using normative legal research methodology with a conceptual approach grounded in Gustav Radbruch's legal philosophy which emphasizes. The research analyzes primary legal materials, including the Electronic Information and Transactions Law and implementing regulations, supplemented by secondary data from policy documents and case studies of breached government websites. Results demonstrate that while algorithmic blocking has successfully reduced gambling site accessibility by over 80%, it has simultaneously compromised data security indiscriminately blocking compromised government portals without adequate due process mechanisms. The absence of transparent algorithmic criteria in the TRUST+Positif system and the lack of procedural safeguards have created legal uncertainty and disproportionate impacts on public service delivery. The study concludes that Indonesia's current approach prioritizes technical utility over justice and legal certainty, necessitating regulatory reforms that balance cybersecurity objectives with constitutional privacy protections through precision-based blocking, algorithmic transparency requirements, and independent oversight mechanisms to ensure digital governance that respects fundamental rights while effectively combating online gambling.

Title

Found 4 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 4 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 4 Documents
Search