Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Arena Hukum Veritas et Justitia Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus
Efendi, Muhammad Fadli
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
REKONSTRUKSI HUKUM KEWENANGAN PENGUJIAN TAP MPR TERHADAP UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI Efendi, Muhammad Fadli
Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus Vol 5 No 1 (2022): Februari 2022
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/jhmo.v5i1.5647

Abstract

The existence of the return of the TAP MPR in the hierarchy of laws and regulations in Indonesia has sparked a polemic, where the Constitutional Court itself stated that it was not authorized to test the products of the TAP MPR so that this raises a norm vacuum, which means that the norm vacuum is in the absence of arrangements for testing the MPR TAP and the absence of an institution authorized to conduct testing when later an MPR TAP is contrary to the legal norms above it or to a higher degree, namely the NRI Constitution 1945. This study aims to provide an understanding by reconstructing the law regarding the review of the MPR TAP, which the Constitutional Court should have declared itself authorized to conduct a judicial review of the MPR TAP on the Constitution as the Constitutional Court's function is to guard and enforce the supremacy of the constitution. The method in this research is a normative juridical research method with a statutory approach, and a conceptual approach. From the results of the legal reconstruction regarding the review of the TAP MPR, it can be said that the TAP MPR can actually be tested for constitutionality through a judicial review by the Constitutional Court. Keywords: constitutional court; judicial review; legal reconstruction; TAP MPR Abstrak Keberadaan kembalinya TAP MPR dalam hierarki peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia menuai polemik, di mana Mahkamah Konstitusi sendiri menyatakan dirinya tidak berwenang untuk menguji produk TAP MPR sehingga hal ini memunculkan sebuah kekosongan norma, yang artinya kekosongan norma itu dalam hal tidak adanya pengaturan pengujian TAP MPR serta tidak terdapatnya suatu lembaga yang berwenang untuk melakukan pengujian ketika nantinya sebuah TAP MPR bertentangan dengan norma hukum yang berada diatasnya atau derajatnya lebih tinggi yaitu UUD NRI 1945. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan pemahaman dengan melakukan rekonstruksi hukum mengenai pengujian TAP MPR yang seharusnya Mahkamah Konstitusi menyatakan diri berwenang melakukan judicial review atas TAP MPR terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar sebagaimana fungsinya Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai pengawal dan penegak supremasi konstitusi. Metode dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, dan pendekatan konseptual. Dari hasil rekonstruksi hukum mengenai pengujian TAP MPR, dapat dikatakan bahwa TAP MPR sebenarnya dapat di uji konstitusionalitasnya melalui judicial review oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi. Kata kunci: judicial review; mahkamah konstitusi; rekonstruksi hukum; TAP MPR
MEKANISME LEGISLATIVE REVIEW PERATURAN PEMERINTAH PENGGANTI UNDANG-UNDANG DALAM PERSPEKTIF POLITIK HUKUM Efendi, Muhammad Fadli
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 7 No. 2 (2021): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v7i2.4215

Abstract

With the issuance of Constitutional Court decision No. 138/PUU-VII/2009, a legal conflict arises between the Parliament and Constitutional Court, regarding which state institution possess the authority to review any Government Regulation in lieu of Law.  Both institutions declared themselves to be having the sole authority to do just that.  The author, using a juridical normative approach, suggest otherwise. In the auhtor’s opinion, it is the Parliament who should be regarded as having the sole authority. This said taking into consideration that – as soon as the emergency justifung the issuance of the government regulation in lieu of legislation ends – both the government and the parliament shall as soon as possible convene to determine whether this government regulation should be declared null and void or elevated to the status of Law.
MEKANISME LEGISLATIVE REVIEW PERATURAN PEMERINTAH PENGGANTI UNDANG-UNDANG DALAM PERSPEKTIF POLITIK HUKUM Efendi, Muhammad Fadli
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 7 No. 2 (2021): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v7i2.4215

Abstract

With the issuance of Constitutional Court decision No. 138/PUU-VII/2009, a legal conflict arises between the Parliament and Constitutional Court, regarding which state institution possess the authority to review any Government Regulation in lieu of Law.  Both institutions declared themselves to be having the sole authority to do just that.  The author, using a juridical normative approach, suggest otherwise. In the auhtor’s opinion, it is the Parliament who should be regarded as having the sole authority. This said taking into consideration that – as soon as the emergency justifung the issuance of the government regulation in lieu of legislation ends – both the government and the parliament shall as soon as possible convene to determine whether this government regulation should be declared null and void or elevated to the status of Law.
REFORMULATION OF REGULATIONS ON INDONESIAN CITIZENS WHO HAD JOINED THE ISLAMIC STATE OF IRAQ AND SYRIA (ISIS) Susmayanti, Riana; Nur Widhiyanti, Hanif; Efendi, Muhammad Fadli
Arena Hukum Vol. 16 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2023.01602.5

Abstract

The repatriation of ex-ISIS members to Indonesia will have an impact on the community, because previous jihadi alumni from Afghanistan carried out terrorist bombings in several locations after they returned to Indonesia. This research will analyze the classification of Indonesian citizens who had joined ISIS; the Indonesian citizens who had joined ISIS according to Indonesian regulations and the reformulation of regulations on Indonesian citizens who had joined ISIS. This normative juridical research uses statutory approach and conceptual approach. The results of this study shows that the classification of Indonesian citizens who had joined ISIS based on hierarchy in the organization and concerned involvement in ISIS, the regulatory violations committed by Indonesian citizens by joining ISIS, and the urgency of changing the citizenship law that applies to Indonesian citizens who join ISIS.
Co-Authors Nur Widhiyanti, Hanif Riana Susmayanti