Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Arena Hukum Veritas et Justitia Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus
Efendi, Muhammad Fadli
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Veritas et Justitia

 1 
MEKANISME LEGISLATIVE REVIEW PERATURAN PEMERINTAH PENGGANTI UNDANG-UNDANG DALAM PERSPEKTIF POLITIK HUKUM Efendi, Muhammad Fadli
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 7 No. 2 (2021): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v7i2.4215

Abstract

With the issuance of Constitutional Court decision No. 138/PUU-VII/2009, a legal conflict arises between the Parliament and Constitutional Court, regarding which state institution possess the authority to review any Government Regulation in lieu of Law.  Both institutions declared themselves to be having the sole authority to do just that.  The author, using a juridical normative approach, suggest otherwise. In the auhtor’s opinion, it is the Parliament who should be regarded as having the sole authority. This said taking into consideration that – as soon as the emergency justifung the issuance of the government regulation in lieu of legislation ends – both the government and the parliament shall as soon as possible convene to determine whether this government regulation should be declared null and void or elevated to the status of Law.
MEKANISME LEGISLATIVE REVIEW PERATURAN PEMERINTAH PENGGANTI UNDANG-UNDANG DALAM PERSPEKTIF POLITIK HUKUM Efendi, Muhammad Fadli
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 7 No. 2 (2021): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v7i2.4215

Abstract

With the issuance of Constitutional Court decision No. 138/PUU-VII/2009, a legal conflict arises between the Parliament and Constitutional Court, regarding which state institution possess the authority to review any Government Regulation in lieu of Law.  Both institutions declared themselves to be having the sole authority to do just that.  The author, using a juridical normative approach, suggest otherwise. In the auhtor’s opinion, it is the Parliament who should be regarded as having the sole authority. This said taking into consideration that – as soon as the emergency justifung the issuance of the government regulation in lieu of legislation ends – both the government and the parliament shall as soon as possible convene to determine whether this government regulation should be declared null and void or elevated to the status of Law.
Co-Authors Nur Widhiyanti, Hanif Riana Susmayanti