Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Kedudukan Harta Bersama dalam Perkawinan Poligami yang Tidak Dicatatkan Oktafia, Yeni; Sudarsono, Sudarsono
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 6, No 2 (2021): Desember 2021
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (338.814 KB) | DOI: 10.17977/um019v6i2p462-469

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the distribution of joint property in unregistered polygamous marriages and the legal certainty of the distribution in unregistered polygamous marriages. This study was normative juridical research because this study used the statutory approach, the conceptual approach, and the historical approach. Data collection techniques were sourced from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The researcher analyzed data with descriptive analysis and interpretation methods. The study results showed that the distribution of joint property in polygamous marriages that were not registered must carry out isbat marriage so that there was a guarantee of legal protection for the distribution of joint property. The division of joint property in a polygamous marriage that was not registered was equated with a legal marriage as long as it could be proven to have good faith in its implementation. The legal certainty of the distribution of joint assets in unregistered polygamous marriages could be carried out by law chosen by husband and wife by deliberation and consensus. If submitted in court, it was based on the right of rechtsvinding based on ijtihad and the noble values of Indonesian customary law.
The Validity of Submission in Credit Agreements Based on Sharia Principles Nurhayati, Prawatya Ido; Oktafia, Yeni
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): OCTOBER
Publisher : Transpublika Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55047/polri.v4i4.1872

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to investigate on the concept of submission in legs of credit agreements based on Shariah concept. This research is intended to measure the legality of these agreements based on the requirements of contract in accordance with the stipulation set out in Article 1320 of the Option of Contractual Law, so that only those agreements in respect of the law, so that all concerned parties must comply with the legal principles set forth by law. Moreover, this research also aims to evaluate and determine the authority of the Religious Court to resolve disputes arising from implementation of Shariah credit agreement entries. This study used a normative juridical research method to analyze the relationship between credit agreements and Shariah. The motivation for this study is the increasing number of Shariah credit agreements formed lately, some of which are not based on the basic principles of Shariah credit agreements. The results of the research show that the jurisdiction of Religious Courts to resolve these disputes is governed by Law Number 3 of 2006 concerning the Religious Courts, so that although there is wide jurisdiction for these courts in principle, there are still limitations in the authority of these courts to resolve disputes arising from the execution of the Shariah credit agreement.
STRENGTHENING ACCOUNTABILITY IN INDONESIAN NOTARIAL PRACTICE: THE LEGAL GAP ON LIABILITY FOR BACKDATED DEEDS Afwija, Zahwa Maulidina; Oktafia, Yeni; Ghofar, Abdul
Indonesia Private Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/iplr.v6i1.4459

Abstract

The issuance of backdated deeds raises serious legal concerns as it can misrepresent facts and violate procedural requirements under Indonesian notarial law. Although a notarial deed’s formal validity relies on its authenticity, backdating undermines this integrity and may result in significant legal consequences. Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Notary Profession (UUJN) and its amendments do not explicitly regulate notary liability toward third parties who suffer losses, creating a normative gap and weakening legal protection. This study examines the legal implications of backdated deeds and the scope of notary liability using a normative juridical approach with statutory and conceptual analyses, focusing on the interrelation of administrative, civil, and criminal responsibilities. Findings indicate that a notary may face administrative sanctions under Articles 12 and 65A UUJN, civil liability under Articles 1243 and 1365 KUHPerdata, and criminal sanctions under Articles 263 and 264 KUHAP. These results underscore the need for regulatory reform to ensure accountability and strengthen legal certainty, and the study recommends enhancing notarial prudence and ethical compliance, reinforcing supervisory oversight, and revising notarial law to provide explicit sanctions and protection for parties harmed by backdated deeds.
URGENSI PEMISAHAN HARTA PRIBADI DENGAN JABATAN NOTARIS DALAM HAL KEPAILITAN NOTARIS Afwija, Zahwa Maulidina; Oktafia, Yeni
Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan Vol. 14 No. 2 (2025): Repertorium: November 2025
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/rpt.v14i2.5037

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji mengenai adanya disharmonisasi terkait kepailitan notaris dan dampaknya terhadap jabatan Notaris berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris dan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan. Permasalahan mendasar muncul ketika status kepailitan pribadi notaris secara otomatis mengakibatkan pemberhentian tidak hormat dari jabatannya, tanpa mempertimbangkan pemisahan antara kapasitas pribadi sebagai subjek hukum dengan fungsi publiknya sebagai pejabat umum. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis keterkaitan subjek hukum pailit dengan profesi notaris serta mengidentifikasi urgensi pemisahan harta pribadi dengan jabatan notaris. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan perbandingan hukum, mengkaji doktrin-doktrin hukum dan peraturan perundang-undangan terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya disharmoni normatif antara UU Kepailitan yang tidak mengatur konsekuensi terhadap jabatan publik dengan UUJN yang memberlakukan sanksi administratif berdasarkan status hukum privat. Sistem pemberhentian otomatis ini tidak sejalan dengan praktik terbaik di negara-negara seperti Belanda dan Jerman yang menerapkan mekanisme pengawasan khusus dan pemisahan dana secara tegas. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan perlunya reformasi regulasi melalui penerapan sistem pemisahan harta yang komprehensif, kategorisasi berdasarkan penyebab kepailitan, dan alternatif pemberhentian sementara dengan kemungkinan rehabilitasi untuk menciptakan keseimbangan antara perlindungan kepentingan publik dengan hak konstitusional notaris.