Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

The Impact of Liquidity, Solvability, Activity, Profitability, Asset Growth, and Sales Growth to Systematic Risk With Firm Size as Moderating Variable on Consumer Non-Cyclicals Company Listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange 2017-2021 Siti Lestari; Lis Sintha
Quantitative Economics and Management Studies Vol. 3 No. 6 (2022)
Publisher : PT Mattawang Mediatama Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (406.406 KB) | DOI: 10.35877/454RI.qems1110

Abstract

Investors need useful information as a signal to decide on investment because investment activity contains risk of uncertainty that will occur in the future that can not be handled by diversification which is called systematic risk. Systematic risk is calculated by beta stock which the companies have different beta values. Therefore, this research aims to analyze the impact of financial information on the beta stock in sector consumer non-cyclicals listed on Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) with the observation period 2017-2021. Respon variables in this research are liquidity, solvability, activity, profitability, asset growth, and sales growth, with firm size as the moderating variable. Population in this research was 103 companies, then got 40 companies after doing the purposive sampling method, so there were 200 units of analysis with five years of analysis. Data analysis method using SEM-PLS analysis with software SmartPLS. The results show that liquidity has a significant negative impact on systematic risk. Solvability, profitability, and sales growth significantly positively affect systematic risk. Activity and asset growth are not relevant to systematic risk. The moderation test result proves that firm size significantly adequates the impact of liquidity, profitability, and sales growth on systematic risk. Firm size does not significantly adequate the impact of solvability, activity, and asset growth on systematic risk.
Kinerja Efisiensi Industri Perbankan Indonesia: Bank Pembangunan Daerah Lis Sintha
JURNAL MITRA MANAJEMEN Vol 6, No 1 (2014): JURNAL MITRA MANAJEMEN
Publisher : JURNAL MITRA MANAJEMEN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35968/jmm.v6i1.538

Abstract

AbstractTo achieve maximum benefit level, a company must be able to produce the optimaloutput level with a certain number of inputs (technical efficiency) and produces output with theright combination at a certain price level (allocative efficiency). The concept of efficiencymeasurement can be viewed either with a focus on the input side (input-oriented) or focus onthe output side (output-oriented). The second approach is analogous to the concept of theprimal and dual operations research techniques, which are like two sides of a coin, so that thetwo approaches will consistently produce the same conclusions about the relative efficiency ofa company to the relationship.For BPD who are not able to achieve 100% efficiency rating, to achieve the maximumvalue of the bank should increase total loan and total revenue portfolio. For the banks withBPD, especially medium and small can take several policies to improve the efficiency of theoptimal performance, through economics of scale in operations and focus on lending to micro,small and medium enterprises (SMEs). In addition, monetary authorities and governmentshould consider to from a Local Credit Guarantee Agency (LCGA). Credit guarantee is thecomplement of a credit system and can serve as a substitution for collateral, despite subograsibilling remains the duty of the creditor.Keywords: EfficiencyBank, Regional Development Banks (BPD)
Analisis Hubungan Likuiditas, Hutang, Kebijakan Dividen Sebelumnya, dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Kebijakan Dividen Perusahaan Industri Manufaktur di BEI Periode 2008-2010 Lis Sintha; Sima Sebayang
JURNAL MITRA MANAJEMEN Vol 4, No 1 (2012): JURNAL MITRA MANAJEMEN
Publisher : JURNAL MITRA MANAJEMEN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35968/jmm.v4i1.581

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe objective of this research is to predict return of investment in equitysecurities. Investors have primarily objective to increase return from theirinvestment. Investors buy stock from public enterprise and may get dividend orcapital gain as its return.Focus on dividend as its return, this research was conducted to examine theeffect of variable Current Ratio (CURR), debt to equity ratio (DER), and Return onEquity (ROE) toward Dividend Per Share (DPS), in manufacturing companies thatlisted in Indonesia Stock Exchange.The data in this study were taken from the financial statements of companiesmanufacturing in Indonesia Stock Exchanges in the period study was fromDecember 31, 2008 until December 31, 2010. To Obtain financial statements fromeach company, the researcher got in from www.idx.co.id, to see the companiesincluded into the manufacturing industry seen form www.duniainvestasi.com, and tosee company paying the dividends in cash, the researchers see it fromwww.ksie.com. The samples and data are collected using purposive samplingmethod.Hypothesis test of this research using Panel Least Square (PLS). regressionresult shows that three independent variables used may affect dependent variablesas much as 94,7% and the rest which is 5,3% explained by other variables that notbeing used in this research model. Result of simultaneous test shows that threeindependent variables together can explain amount of DPS.Conclusion of this research is the results of this research with significant level5% also indicate that ROE has significantly affect on the DPS. While, two otherindependent variables doesn’t have significantly impact to DPS, they are CURR andDER.Keyword: Dividend Per Share, Current Ratio, Debt to Equity Ratio, Return OnEquity, and Panel Least Square.
Analisa Faktor-faktor CAMEL Terhadap Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Khususnya Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Lis Sintha
JURNAL MITRA MANAJEMEN Vol 5, No 1 (2013): JURNAL MITRA MANAJEMEN
Publisher : JURNAL MITRA MANAJEMEN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35968/jmm.v5i1.563

Abstract

UMKM sector resilience against the economic crisis that hit the Republic of Indonesia in 1998 proved that the UMKM sector was less affected by the crisis. It is due to the UMKM sector engaged in almost all sectors such as trade, services, households and others, and can not be denied that UMKM is the economy foundation of a developing country. In this time we can see UMKM development also demands the development of BPR that has the image of fund provider bank for UMKM. With high market demand and a growing number of competitors automatically makes the level of competition becomes more intense especially among rural banks and other non-bank financial institutions, in a super tight competition as well as in a state of high profit oriented rural banks must have sufficient capital, maintaining asset quality well, managed and operated by the precautionary principle, generate enough profit to sustain their business, and to maintain liquidity in order to meet its obligations at all times. In addition, the RB must always meet the various regulations and rules that have been set, which is basically a variety of provisions that refer to the principles of prudence in banking. Assessment of the soundness of banks in Indonesia implemented by Bank Indonesia is largely based on the method of CAMEL (Capital, Asset Quality, Management, Earning, and Liabilities). These five factors are the factors that determine or describe the condition of a bank. If a bank is experiencing problems in one factor or more, the bank is certainly going to have a trouble.Keywords: Capital, Asset Quality, Management, Earning, and Liabilities
Pengelolaan Manajemen Risiko pada Industri Perbankan Lis Sintha
JURNAL MITRA MANAJEMEN Vol 8, No 1 (2016): JURNAL MITRA MANAJEMEN
Publisher : JURNAL MITRA MANAJEMEN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35968/jmm.v8i1.504

Abstract

AbstractThe banking industry is an industry that is laden with risks, especially as it involves themanagement of public money and screened in the form of investment. To minimize therisks faced, bank management should have sufficient expertise and competence, so that avariety of risks that could potentially arise can be anticipated from the beginning, and lookfor a better way of handling it. The types of risks presented by the economists are verydiverse but substantially similar to one another. Broadly speaking, the grouping of riskconducted by economists are almost the same description and its coverage. The biggerand modern bank, the more numerous and complex risks that it faces.Financial risks faced by the banking industry, can be broadly grouped into five (5) majorrisk, namely: (1) credit risk, (2) market risk, (3) liquidity risk, (4) operational risks, and (5 )risk capital. These risks are presented in the financial ratios, indicating that theperformance achieved by management in managing a bank.Bank Indonesia based on the Basel II classifies eight (8) types of risk are generallydivided into two (2) categories of risk, which can be measured (quantitative), namely creditrisk, market risk, liquidity risk, operational risk and risks are difficult to measure(qualitative) that legal risk, strategic risk, reputation risk and compliance risk.Keywords: Risk Management; Basel II; Banking
Analisis Risiko Fraud Pada Penyaluran Kredit Usaha Rakyat (KUR) (Studi Kasus Pada Bank XYZ) Susilo Kristiono S; Poerwaningsih S; Lis Sintha
Journal Scientific of Mandalika (JSM) e-ISSN 2745-5955 | p-ISSN 2809-0543 Vol. 6 No. 5 (2025)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mandalika Indonesia (IP2MI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/10.36312/vol6iss5pp1247-1261

Abstract

During the last 3 (three) years, the quality of People's Business Credit (KUR) distribution at Bank XYZ showed an increase in the percentage of Non-Performing Loans (problematic loans), in addition to the number of claims rejected by the guarantee company has increased. The rejection of KUR claims is more dominantly due to the KUR distribution process not being in accordance with applicable provisions, including indications of fraud committed by bank employees. The impact of the KUR rejection caused bad debts to not be resolved, resulting in losses for the company. The results of risk measurement using the fishbond diagram obtained 11 causes of debtor defaults that were indicated as fraud grouped into 4 (four) aspects; process, people, policy, and system. Of the 11 causes of debtor defaults, there are 2 (two) causes classified as Supplementary Issues, which are recommended to take risk mitigation measures. By knowing the impact and opportunities for the occurrence of causes of debtor defaults, mitigation of possibilities and mitigation of impacts can be carried out appropriately and correctly, so that it is expected to reduce or even avoid the risks that will occur.