Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

NGANTEN KERIS SEBAGAI SALAH SATU UPAYA MEMBERIKAN KEPASTIAN HAK WARIS ANAK DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ADAT BALI Pasek Suryawan; Benyamin Tungga; Putu Eka Trisna Dewi
VYAVAHARA DUTA Vol 18 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Jurusan Hukum Fakultas Dharma Duta Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Balinese people know a marriage tradition called Nganten Keris. Where a nganten keris marriage is a marriage carried out by a woman with a keris which is a symbol or substitute for the man in the marriage process. There are several factors that cause the occurrence of kris nganten. Among other things, because the groom was unable to attend, the groom was from a higher caste than the bride, and because the woman was pregnant outside of marriage and there was no man willing to marry the woman. Nganten keris is used as an effort to provide certainty about the status of the birth of a child. Because in Balinese customary law, the legal status of a child is determined at the birth of the child. Balinese customary law requires that in order to be an heir a child must be born in a valid marriage according to Balinese customary law. The research method used is normative research using literature studies related to Balinese customary law and Hinduism, in order to find answers to the problem of nganten keris which is used as an effort to provide legal certainty regarding children's inheritance rights in Balinese customary law. Keywords : Nganten Keris, Balinese Traditional Inheritance, Balinese Customary Law.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS KEKUATAN HUKUM ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIK TERHADAP KASUS UJARAN KEBENCIAN DI MESIA SOSIAL PADA TAHAP PENYIDIKAN Ni Made Septiwidiantari; Putu Eka Trisna Dewi; Karyoto
Jurnal Hukum Saraswati Vol 5 No 2 (2023): JHS September 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Mahasaraswati University, Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36733/jhshs.v5i2.8233

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kekuatan hukum penggunaan alat bukti elektronik terhadap kasus ujaran kebencian di media sosial pada tahap penyidikan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan analisis konsep hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukan Pengaturan penggunaan alat bukti elektronik dalam kasus ujaran kebencian di media sosial Instagram pada tahap penyidikan sudah ada dalam Surat Edaran Kapolri Nomor: SE/06/X/2015. Lebih jelasnya, alat bukti elektronik dalam tindak pidana ujaran kebencian diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TERHADAP SESEORANG YANG TIDAK MELAPORKAN ADANYPENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 78/Pid.Sus/2019/Pn Srp) Suriawan, Putu Gede Suriawan; Putu Eka Trisna Dewi
Jurnal Yusthima Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): YUSTHIMA : Jurnal Prodi Magister Hukum FH Unmas Denpasar
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Peran serta masyarakat yang terpayungi oleh UU inimemberikan legitimasi bagi masyarakat untuk melakukanpencegahan dan pemberantasan narkotika yang sifatya tidakdiwajibkan sedangkan di dalam Pasal 131 UU No.35 Tahun2009 di atur tentang kewajiban masyarakat melaporkan tindakpidana Narkotika. Rumusan masalah pertama, bagaimanapenerapan hukum pidana dalam UU RI No. 35 Tahun 2009terhadap seseorang yang tidak melaporkan adanya penyalahgunaan narkotika (Studi Kasus Putusan No.78/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Srp) dan bagaimanakah pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap seseorang yang tidakmelaporkan adanya penyalahgunaan narkotika pada perkarapidana No. 78/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Srp)Penelitian ini memuat penelitian hukum empiris, denganmenggunakan sifat penelitian deskriptif. Pertanggungjawabanpidana terhadap orang yang mengetahui peredaran Narkotikatetapi tidak melaporkan dalam Putusan Pengadilan NegeriSemarapura Nomor 78/PID.SUS/2019/PN.Srp di laksanakandengan pemidanaan terhadap Terdakwa Luh Nila Emaliani yangtelah terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan bersalah. Dasarhukum pertimbangan hukum dalam menjatuhkan putusanterhadap delik tidak melaporkan adanya penyalahgunaanNarkotika oleh terdakwa Luh Nila Emaliani dalam perkaraNo.78/Pid.Sus/2019/PN.Srp adalah: Adanya tuntutan dariPenuntut Umum, Fakta bahwa terdakwa tidak didampingipenasihat hukum, Adanya surat dakwaan, Adanya pembuktianberdasarkan alat bukti
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP DEBITUR ATAS PERMOHONAN PAILIT YANG DIAJUKAN OLEH KREDITUR TIDAK BERITIKAD BAIK Syarifah Rohmatulloh; Putu Eka Trisna Dewi; Karyoto
Jurnal Hukum Saraswati Vol 6 No 2 (2024): JHS SEPTEMBER 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Mahasaraswati University, Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Protection of debtors is very important, in order to guarantee certainty, justice and legal benefits in society. Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations. This regulation was issued in order to provide certainty, justice and legal benefits as well as fulfill business interests in resolving all issues related to the company's debts. Apart from that, this regulates the protection of the rights of the parties in the subject of bankruptcy. However, sometimes existing regulations are not implemented properly so that the effectiveness of existing regulations does not apply optimally. So maximum efforts are needed to achieve a desired legal goal. In this research the author uses normative juridical research methods by examining the extent to which Law Number 37 of 2004 can overcome problems related to debtors in bankruptcy. The insolvency test is a form of legal protection for debtors who still have good solvency and have good intentions.
The Effectiveness of Village-Based Foreigner Supervision at the Class I Special TPI Ngurah Rai Immigration Office Reni Desnita Purba; Cokorde Istri Dian Laksmi Dewi; Putu Eka Trisna Dewi
Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Vol. 23 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial
Publisher : Pengurus Pusat Perkumpulan Ilmuwan Administrasi Negara Indonesia (PIANI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63309/dialektika.v23i1.439

Abstract

The Ngurah Rai Immigration Office on November 4, 2022 launched the policy of Integration of Supervision and Services for Foreign Citizens Based on Villages (I Wayan Wisesa). This policy is a strategic step to increase community participation in supervising the presence and activities of foreigners. This policy embraces the Head of the Environment, however, in 2 years of its implementation, this policy has not been effective as indicated by the low number of complaints. This preventive effort has not been able to stem the rampant viral news of naughty behavior by foreign tourists in Bali. Normative Juridical Research with a sociological juridical approach resulted in the following conclusions: a) The ineffectiveness of the implementation of I Wayan Wisesa is due to the very high acceptance of Balinese people towards foreign tourists; a strong stigma in society that monitoring the presence and activities of foreigners is the responsibility of Immigration officers; and Security officers in the village environment do not yet have adequate competence, sectoral egos, lack of socialization, and low legal awareness of the Community; b) Strategic steps that can be taken are as follows: improving the quality of cross-agency coordination; increasing the intensity and effectiveness of socialization and education on the importance of supervising foreigners; allocate a budget for supervision for Community and Head of Environment involvement; Wayan Wisesa's workflow needs to be arranged.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN DEBITOR ATAS UTANG BARU YANG TIMBUL DARI GAGALNYA GOING CONCERN TANPA IZIN HAKIM PENGAWAS Vinsensius Jala; Putu Eka Trisna Dewi; Benyamin Tungga
Jurnal Hukum Saraswati Vol 7 No 01 (2025): JURNAL HUKUM SARASWATI MARET 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Mahasaraswati University, Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36733/jhshs.v7i01.11500

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the problem of debtor responsibility for new debts arising from the failure of a going concern without the permission of the supervising judge. The method used to obtain answers to these research problems is normative juridical research using a statutory approach, case approach and conceptual approach, then answering research problems is based on primary legal materials and secondary legal materials collected using library study techniques. In this research, the results obtained show that bankrupt debtors who carry out going concern actions do not comply with the provisions regulated in the Bankruptcy Law, namely without permission from the supervising judge, this is an unlawful act which can be held accountable based on the principle of responsibility based on liability based on fault as regulated in Article 1365 Civil Code. In this way, the bankrupt debtor who is going concern without the permission of the supervisory judge is responsible for paying off all new debts that arise after going concern illegally.
PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP ANAK YANG BERKONFLIK DENGAN HUKUM DITINJAU DARI HUKUM POSITIF DI INDONESIA Kadek Dwi Marta Prandika; Putu Eka Trisna Dewi; Karyoto
Jurnal Hukum Saraswati Vol 7 No 01 (2025): JURNAL HUKUM SARASWATI MARET 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Mahasaraswati University, Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36733/jhshs.v7i01.11501

Abstract

The development of juvenile delinquency and criminal acts which is very significant at this time is influenced by several factors including, socio-economic factors, family factors (broken homes), social factors, environmental factors and rapid technological developments. Apart from the factors listed above, the most basic things are that children easily commit juvenile delinquency, where in current conditions children are rarely given an understanding regarding the consequences that will arise. Apart from that, the influencing factors are related to mitigating policies and the role of the government and existing officials who are still hesitant in making a decision. Actions carried out by children do not necessarily come from within the child, this also arises from environmental and social factors so that crimes will easily occur among children. From the actions taken there will also arise sanctions or a criminal process which will have a deterrent effect on children. This research uses a normative juridical method, by analyzing primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials using normative and qualitative juridical analysis, then arranged systematically. The types of legal materials that will be used are in accordance with the purpose of discussing this material, namely: Primary legal materials consisting of: Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System.
EKSEKUSI JAMINAN FIDUSIA: ANALISIS KONFLIK NORMA DALAM UU NOMOR 42 TAHUN 1999 DAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NO. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Putu Eka Trisna Dewi
INVENTION: Journal of Intellectual Property Law Vol 1 No 1 (2024): INVENTION: Journal of Intellectual Property Law
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Pusat Kajian - Universitas Ngurah Rai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70358/invention.v1i1.1248

Abstract

Undang-Undang (UU) Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia (UUJF) menetapkan fidusia sebagai salah satu metode jaminan dalam transaksi hutang piutang yang dijamin oleh undang-undang untuk memudahkan eksekusinya. Kemudahan ini dikenal sebagai parate eksekusi, yang memungkinkan kreditor untuk menjual atau melelang objek jaminan fidusia jika debitur melakukan wanprestasi. Namun, proses eksekusi jaminan fidusia mengalami perubahan signifikan sejak dikeluarkannya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Penelitian yuridis normatif ini menemukan adanya konflik norma dalam konsep jaminan fidusia sebagai akibat dari putusan tersebut. Berdasarkan UUJF, eksekusi dapat dilakukan secara sukarela oleh debitur saat terjadi wanprestasi. Sebaliknya, Putusan MK mengharuskan bahwa mekanisme dan prosedur hukum pelaksanaan eksekusi Sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia harus dilakukan dan berlaku sama dengan pelaksanaan eksekusi putusan pengadilan yang telah berkekuatan hukum tetap. Penelitian ini mengkaji dampak hukum dari putusan tersebut terhadap eksekusi jaminan fidusia, serta implikasinya bagi kreditor dan debitor dalam pelaksanaan perjanjian hutang piutang di Indonesia.