Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Environmental Loss As An Element Of State Loss In Corruption Offences Karosekali, Timothy Christian Randal; Frans, Mardian Putra
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 11 No 1 (2025): April
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v11i1.7192

This research aims to discuss legal issues regarding the validity of environmental loss as an element of state loss in criminal acts of corruption. The main aim of this research is to answer the legal issue of whether environmental damage can be categorized as an element of state loss in criminal acts of corruption. The type of research used in this research is normative legal research, namely by examining statutory regulations, legal doctrine, and legal principles related to the problem being studied. The research results show that environmental damage cannot be evidence of a criminal act because Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 of the Corruption Law must be proven by real state financial losses (actual loss) is not a potential or estimated state financial loss (potential loss). Now, law enforcers must be able to prove the real or real value of losses to state finances or the state economy (actual loss), not just based on the potential value of losses that may occur (potential loss)

IMPLEMENTASI PIDANA DIBAWAH MINIMAL DALAM KASUS NARKOTIKA BERDASAR PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PROGRESIVE Frans, Mardian Putra
SUPREMASI : Jurnal Hukum Vol 4 No 2 (2022): SUPREMASI : Jurnal Hukum 2022
Publisher : Universitas Sahid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36441/supremasi.v4i2.652

Pidana minimal telah ditentukan didalam Undang-Undang Nomor 35 tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika. Penentuan batas minimal menjadi pembatas bagi hakim untuk memberikan sanksi pidana tidak kurang dari batas minimal yang telah ditentukan. Hal ini tentu dipertentangkan dengan sifat imparsial dari hakim yang melaksanakan perannya dalam memeriksa dan mengadili suatu perkara pidana. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normative dengan mengkaji ratiolegis dari peraturan perundang-undangan untuk mengetahui kandungan filosofis dari suatu Undang-Undang. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, ditemukan bahwa hakim di Pengadilan Negeri kelas II B salatiga pada tahun 2019 dan 2020 telah menjatuhkan putusan dibawah minimal yang ditentukan didalam Undang-undang narkotika. Putusan ini menegaskan tentang peran hakim untuk memberikan keadilan bagi masyarakat serta mengambarkan sifat hakim yang imparsial dalam menjalankan tugasnya dan menciptakan progresivitas hukum.

Penanganan Petty Corruption Dengan Denda Damai Sebagai Bentuk Keadilan Restoratif Simeone, Nicholas Gerard Felix; Frans, Mardian Putra
Widya Yuridika Vol 8 No 1 (2025): Law and Society
Publisher : Universitas Widya Gama Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31328/wy.v8i1.5974

This paper aims to discuss the legal issue of the application of peace fines in an effort to deal with petty corruption. This issue was born out of the issuance of Circular Letter of the Deputy Special Crimes Prosecutor Number: B-113/F/Fd. 1/05/2010 on Prioritization of Achievements in Handling Corruption Cases, which instructs agencies to prioritize corruption crimes with large losses and to discontinue corruption cases with small amounts, only by returning losses. Petty Corruption is a corrupt practice that refers to a relatively small amount of money and is carried out in the bureaucratic process of small public officials. So that if petty corruption is subject to the applicable positive law, it will cause injustice. This paper aims to provide a concept analysis of the application of peaceful fines in handling petty corruption that prioritizes restorative justice, guarantees justice, benefits and legal certainty and fulfills the principle of proportionality. The legal research conducted is normative juridical research with a conceptual approach and a statutory approach. The result of this research is that the mechanism of peaceful fines in handling petty corruption is a solution to the problems that arise. The application of peaceful fines to the handling of petty corruption provides a new breakthrough in law enforcement in the crime of corruption. With the application of peaceful fines, the sanctions given are in accordance with the principle of proportionality so that justice, benefit and legal certainty are fully fulfilled and prioritize restorative justice.

Pembuktian Penipuan Perdagangan Efek dalam Tindak Pidana Pasar Modal Opit, Syaloomita Electra; Frans, Mardian Putra
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 7 No 1: April - September 2025
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v7i1.413

The criminal offense of securities trading fraud seriously threatens the integrity of the Indonesian capital market. Nevertheless, its proof within the realm of criminal law faces significant constraints. This research aims to analyze the normative evidentiary model for securities trading fraud, identify the fundamental challenges in its implementation in Indonesia, and examine strategies to overcome these obstacles. This study utilizes a normative legal research method with statutory and conceptual approaches to scrutinize the legal framework and evidentiary practices. The analysis reveals that proof formally adheres to the theory of negative statutory proof (negatief wettelijke bewijstheorie) based on the Criminal Procedure Code, requiring a minimum of two valid pieces of evidence and an evidence-based judge’s conviction. Nevertheless, the implementation of this model is confronted by multidimensional challenges, encompassing the complexity of criminal schemes, information asymmetry, difficulties in proving criminal intent (mens rea), limitations in the regulatory framework and oversight effectiveness, and constraints in accessing crucial data. This study finds that effective strategies to address these barriers necessitate a combination of interventions in two domains: strengthening substantive regulations, particularly enforcing information disclosure obligations discipline by the FSA, and enhancing transparency and accountability at the corporate level through GCG implementation and shareholder rights protection. It is concluded that a significant gap exists between the normative evidentiary model and the reality of its practical enforcement, and the effectiveness of proving securities trading fraud heavily relies on the synergy between strengthening the formal legal framework and improving the corporate governance ecosystem.

IMPLEMENTASI RESTORATIVE JUSTICE TINDAK PIDANA RINGAN SEBAGAI SOLUSI MENGURANGI OVERCROWDING LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN DI JAWA TENGAH Febriansyah, Yoga; Utomo, Eko Fitra; Frans, Mardian Putra
The Juris Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v8i1.1163

This research aims to find out and analyze whether the application of restorative justice in relation to criminal acts of theft in society has been able to effectively reduce overcrowding in Central Java? The fact in correctional institutions is that there is overcrowding or it could be said that there are too many prisoners occupying one cell in a correctional institution. Problems like this can cause discomfort in correctional institutions for prisoners which can affect the mental and physical health of prisoners who live in cells that do not match capacity. which is there to be inhabited or what is known as overcrowding, then one way to reduce overcrowding is with restorative justice, namely so that minor crimes such as theft and others can be resolved amicably and not escalated in order to reduce the accumulation of prisoners which causes overcrowding in correctional institutions in the region. Central Java, By using empirical legal methodology, it is hoped that this research can find out whether the application of restorative justice in society for minor crimes can reduce overcrowding in correctional institutions in Central Java.

PRINSIP FOLLOW THE MONEY SEBAGAI UPAYA PENGEMBALIAN KERUGIAN NEGARA PASCA KORUPSI Zendy Fariz, Mochamad Rayhan; Frans, Mardian Putra
Jurnal Hukum Ius Publicum Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Ius Publicum
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Doktor Husni Ingratubun Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55551/jip.v6i2.503

Prinsip Follow the Money adalah metode investigatif yang digunakan untuk melacak aliran dana guna mengidentifikasi dan memulihkan kerugian negara akibat tindak pidana korupsi. Penelitian ini membahas implementasi prinsip tersebut di Indonesia dalam konteks pemberantasan korupsi, dengan fokus pada pelacakan aset hasil kejahatan, pengungkapan jaringan pelaku, serta pemulihan aset negara. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan hukum normatif, mencakup analisis terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, doktrin hukum, serta studi kasus relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun pendekatan Follow the Money terbukti efektif dalam beberapa kasus besar, seperti kasus Bantuan Likuiditas Bank Indonesia (BLBI) dan korupsi proyek e-KTP, penerapannya di Indonesia masih menghadapi berbagai tantangan. Hambatan tersebut meliputi keterbatasan teknologi forensik keuangan, kompleksitas transaksi lintas negara yang melibatkan penggunaan aset kripto dan rekening luar negeri, serta minimnya koordinasi antara lembaga penegak hukum dan otoritas keuangan internasional. Selain itu, regulasi domestik yang belum sepenuhnya adaptif terhadap kejahatan keuangan modern juga memperlambat proses investigasi. Oleh karena itu, untuk mengoptimalkan penerapan prinsip ini, dibutuhkan penguatan kapasitas kelembagaan, peningkatan kompetensi sumber daya manusia, pengembangan teknologi deteksi keuangan, serta kerja sama internasional yang lebih efektif melalui mekanisme seperti mutual legal assistance dan pertukaran intelijen keuangan. Dengan dukungan strategis tersebut, potensi pemulihan kerugian negara akibat korupsi dapat ditingkatkan secara signifikan, serta memperkuat integritas sistem hukum dan tata kelola pemerintahan di Indonesia.

Building a Fair Criminal Justice System: The Urgency of a Single Prosecution System for Prosecutors and Police Purbowo, Alma Aulia Shafa; Purnomo, Rafel Nanda; Frans, Mardian Putra
Kertha Patrika Vol. 47 No. 3 (2025): Reinterpreted Civil, Administrative, and Criminal Law into Indonesia Legal Dev
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Udayana University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KP.2025.v47.i03.p07

The Indonesian criminal justice system faces complex challenges in coordination and effectiveness of law enforcement, particularly between the police and the prosecutor's office. The dualism of investigative authority that has existed for some time has given rise to various structural problems, resulting in legal uncertainty and reducing the quality of criminal law enforcement. This study focuses on analyzing the urgency of implementing a Single Prosecution System as a reformative solution in building a more equitable and effective criminal justice system. The concept of a Single Prosecution System is of particular concern because in the practice of law enforcement in Indonesia, there is still a division of dual authority, where prosecutors and the police both have the authority to investigate certain cases such as corruption and gross human rights violations. This condition often leads to unclear tasks between institutions, weak coordination, and overlapping authorities, which result in inconsistencies in the handling of criminal cases. The purpose of this study is to identify the weaknesses of the current criminal justice system and analyze how the implementation of the Single Prosecution System can be a solution to create an integrated, effective, and fair criminal justice system. This study uses a legal-normative approach with secondary data consisting of primary and secondary legal materials. Data analysis was conducted qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that reforming the criminal justice system through the implementation of a Single Prosecution System can eliminate overlapping authority between prosecutors and the police, strengthen institutional coordination, and create an Indonesian criminal justice system that guarantees legal certainty and justice for the community.

Building a Fair Criminal Justice System: The Urgency of a Single Prosecution System for Prosecutors and Police Purbowo, Alma Aulia Shafa; Purnomo, Rafel Nanda; Frans, Mardian Putra
Kertha Patrika Vol. 47 No. 3 (2025): Reinterpreted Civil, Administrative, and Criminal Law into Indonesia Legal Dev
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Udayana University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KP.2025.v47.i03.p07

The Indonesian criminal justice system faces complex challenges in coordination and effectiveness of law enforcement, particularly between the police and the prosecutor's office. The dualism of investigative authority that has existed for some time has given rise to various structural problems, resulting in legal uncertainty and reducing the quality of criminal law enforcement. This study focuses on analyzing the urgency of implementing a Single Prosecution System as a reformative solution in building a more equitable and effective criminal justice system. The concept of a Single Prosecution System is of particular concern because in the practice of law enforcement in Indonesia, there is still a division of dual authority, where prosecutors and the police both have the authority to investigate certain cases such as corruption and gross human rights violations. This condition often leads to unclear tasks between institutions, weak coordination, and overlapping authorities, which result in inconsistencies in the handling of criminal cases. The purpose of this study is to identify the weaknesses of the current criminal justice system and analyze how the implementation of the Single Prosecution System can be a solution to create an integrated, effective, and fair criminal justice system. This study uses a legal-normative approach with secondary data consisting of primary and secondary legal materials. Data analysis was conducted qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that reforming the criminal justice system through the implementation of a Single Prosecution System can eliminate overlapping authority between prosecutors and the police, strengthen institutional coordination, and create an Indonesian criminal justice system that guarantees legal certainty and justice for the community.

PERAN GEREJA DALAM PENCEGAHAN TINDAK PIDANA PERDAGANGAN ORANG DI KLASIS AMARASI BARAT GERAJA MASEHI INJIL DI TIMOR-NUSA TENGGARA TIMUR (GMIT) Obidje, Teddy San George; Frans, Mardian Putra
RIO LAW JURNAL Vol 7, No 1 (2026): Rio Law Jurnal
Publisher : Universitas Muara Bungo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36355/rlj.v7i1.1942

Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang (TPPO) merupakan salah satu bentuk kejahatan transnasional yang marak terjadi di Nusa Tenggara Timur (NTT), khususnya di wilayah Klasis Amarasi Barat. Faktor utama penyebab tingginya kasus TPPO adalah kondisi ekonomi yang lemah, rendahnya pendidikan, serta keterbatasan lapangan kerja. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran jemaat Gereja Masehi Injili di Timor (GMIT) Klasis Amarasi Barat dalam upaya pencegahan TPPO. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian empiris dengan pendekatan sosio-legal melalui wawancara dengan jemaat, pendeta, ketua klasis, serta perwakilan Rumah Harapan GMIT, disertai studi peraturan perundang-undangan yang relevan, khususnya Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2007 tentang Pemberantasan TPPO. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa jemaat berperan penting dalam edukasi, pelayanan diakonia, pemberdayaan ekonomi, serta kerja sama dengan pemerintah dan organisasi non-pemerintah. Gereja juga menjadi ruang aman bagi korban dan keluarga untuk melapor. Dengan berlandaskan nilai kasih dan keadilan Injil, GMIT Klasis Amarasi Barat mampu berperan sebagai agen sosial dan spiritual yang strategis dalam pencegahan TPPO. Penelitian ini menegaskan pentingnya sinergi antara gereja, masyarakat, pemerintah, dan lembaga terkait dalam menciptakan sistem perlindungan yang efektif dan menyeluruh bagi masyarakat rentan terhadap perdagangan orang.Kata Kunci: Perdagangan orang, gereja, jemaat, GMIT, pencegahan TPPO, Nusa Tenggara Timur.

PERCOBAAN TINDAK PIDANA PADA DELIK TERORISME DALAM KUHP NASIONAL DAN UNDANG-UNDANG TENTANG PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA TERORISME Christopher, Matthew; Frans, Mardian Putra
JOURNAL EQUITABLE Vol 11 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : LPPM, Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37859/jeq.v11i1.10498

Karena tindakan terorisme merupakan tindakan yang sangat keji (super mala per se) dan dikecam keras oleh seluruh masyarakat (strong people comdemnation) terorisme telah menarik perhatian nasional dan internasional. Serta terorisme mengancam keselamatan Negara. karena itu Negara Indonesia membuat Undang-Undang tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Terorisme yang merupakan Undang-Undang Khusus sebagai upaya menghentikan tindak pidana terorisme. Dalam Undang-Undang No.5 Tahun 2018 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Terorisme (UU Terorisme) percobaan sama saja delik selesai sebab kejahatan yang staatsgevaarlijke misdrijven (kejahatan terhadap keselamatan Negara) selayaknya ditangani pada saat kejahatan masih dalam tahap persiapan atau pada voorbereidingsstadium. Seiring dengan waktu berjalan dan perkembangan dunia, hukum juga perlu mengalami pembaharuan agar selaras dengan perkembangan. Pemerintah Indonesia lalu memperbaharui Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) melalui proses rekodifikasi yang menyatukan berbagai Peraturan perundang-undangan menjadi satu kedalam Undang-Undang No.1 Tahun 2023 didalamya juga mengatur delik terorisme. Penelitian ini memakai metode penelitian hukum normativ melalui penelusuran dokumen. Penelitian dilakukan untuk meninjau perihal percobaan tindak pidana terorisme, apakah percobaan yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang No.5 Tahun 2018 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Terorisme (UU Terorisme) dapat diterapkan pada Undang-Undang No.1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana baru (KUHP baru). Adanya benturan asas dan pengaturan tentang percobaan terorisme setelah diberlakukannya KUHP baru. Hasil dari penelitian diperoleh sebab kodifikasi KUHP dilakukan dengan menyatukan dan menyelaraskan peraturan yang ada di luar KUHP untuk masuk kedalam KUHP agar KUHP menjadi dasar dari hukum yang berada diluar KUHP maka percobaan terorisme menganut ketentuan percobaan dalam KUHP baru dengan menganut asas asas lex posterior derogate legi priori.

Title

Found 10 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 10 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 10 Documents
Search