Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan Jurnal Pajak dan Keuangan Negara (PKN)
Prayuda, Jun Rifky
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Skema Ponzi: Indikasi Kecurangan Pada Valuasi Startup Menggunakan Gross Merchandise Value Firmansyah, Amrie; Prayuda, Jun Rifky; Zakiyuddin, Zakiyuddin
Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan Vol 10 No 1 (2022): JIMKES Edisi April 2022
Publisher : LPPM Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kesatuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37641/jimkes.v10i1.1184

Abstract

Startup-related issues have been growing in recent years due to their massive publication in the media. The growth numbers of startup companies globally, especially in Indonesia, have shown an astonishing figure. Valuation is one of many issues that revolve around startups. This study examines valuation fraud that leads to Ponzi Scheme in startup companies by using Gross Merchandise Value (GMV) as the valuation indicator. Scoping review was employed to identify and map literature that links to this study’s topic comprehensively through many sources. Venture capitalists and management teams play a key role in valuing startups. Financial academics suggest general valuation models, such as Net Present Value (NPV) and Discounted Cash Flows (DCF), are not used to value startups. They tend to value their company subjectively, which doesn’t represent startup true economic values. They use their advantages on information asymmetry excessively, leading to overvaluing the startup’s values. This study concludes that using subjective factors and limiting a startup’s economic and performance information disclosure by only disclosing Gross Merchandise Value will lead to startup valuation fraud in the form of the Ponzi Scheme.
Critical Success Factors in the Implementation of the PPP Scheme in the Wosusokas SPAM Project (Wonogiri, Surakarta, Sukoharjo, and Karanganyar) Prayuda, Jun Rifky; Firmansyah, Amrie; Andana, Rozano Fikri; Sasongko, Rossa Kurnia; Suhendra, Maman
Jurnal Pajak dan Keuangan Negara (PKN) Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Pajak dan Keuangan Negara : September 2023
Publisher : Politeknik Keuangan Negara STAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31092/jpkn.v5i1.2128

Abstract

Infrastructure development is one of the Indonesian government's programs in the RPJMN stage 4 for 2019–2024. The need for significant infrastructure development cannot be met with the state budget alone. Fiscal limitations narrow the space for the government to carry out infrastructure development. Therefore, to overcome these problems, one of the efforts made by the Indonesian government is to implement a PPP scheme. The Wosusokas SPAM project is a drinking water supply infrastructure project in the Wonogiri, Surakarta, Sukoharjo, and Karanganyar areas that uses a PPP scheme. This study uses the scoping review method to collect and analyze critical success factors that play a role in implementing PPP projects. Based on previous studies, implementing the Wosusokas SPAM project can pay attention to five critical success factors: the commitment of partners, the strength of consortiums, asset quality, the political environment, and the national PPP unit. By implementing the five critical success factors from the planning stage to contract execution, the Wosusokas SPAM project is hoped to be implemented more effectively and efficiently.
Skema Ponzi: Indikasi Kecurangan Pada Valuasi Startup Menggunakan Gross Merchandise Value Prayuda, Jun Rifky; Zakiyuddin, Zakiyuddin; Firmansyah, Amrie
Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022): JIMKES Edisi April 2022
Publisher : LPPM Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kesatuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37641/jimkes.v10i1.1184

Abstract

Startup-related issues have been growing in recent years due to their massive publication in the media. The growth numbers of startup companies globally, especially in Indonesia, have shown an astonishing figure. Valuation is one of many issues that revolve around startups. This study examines valuation fraud that leads to Ponzi Scheme in startup companies by using Gross Merchandise Value (GMV) as the valuation indicator. Scoping review was employed to identify and map literature that links to this study’s topic comprehensively through many sources. Venture capitalists and management teams play a key role in valuing startups. Financial academics suggest general valuation models, such as Net Present Value (NPV) and Discounted Cash Flows (DCF), are not used to value startups. They tend to value their company subjectively, which doesn’t represent startup true economic values. They use their advantages on information asymmetry excessively, leading to overvaluing the startup’s values. This study concludes that using subjective factors and limiting a startup’s economic and performance information disclosure by only disclosing Gross Merchandise Value will lead to startup valuation fraud in the form of the Ponzi Scheme.
Co-Authors Amrie Firmansyah Andana, Rozano Fikri Sasongko, Rossa Kurnia Suhendra, Maman Zakiyuddin, Zakiyuddin zakiyuddin, Zakiyuddin