Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

THE POLITICS OF JUSTICE-BASED INTERNATIONAL BANKRUPTCY LAW Soetoto, Erwin Owan Hermansyah
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Vol 11, No 3 (2024): Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jph.v11i3.39589

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze international legal regulations regarding cross-border bankruptcy that are not yet fair, and to analyze international bankruptcy legal policies based on justice that can be applied effectively in a cross-border context. This study uses normative legal research. The results of this study are differences in the application of the territorial principle and the universality principle in various countries can cause injustice to debtors and creditors. The territorial principle can make it difficult for debtors who have separate assets in several countries, so they have to face bankruptcy processes separately in several countries, while the universality principle can cause injustice because creditors can be harmed by the application of the debtor's original law which is more beneficial to the debtor. Restorative justice emphasizes the restoration of losses for the injured party. The restorative justice approach can help reduce conflict in the international bankruptcy process and encourage solutions that prioritize mediation in its resolution. With the restorative justice approach, it is expected to provide justice for all parties.
The Comparison of Online Sale and Purchase Agreements as an Effect of Globalization in Indonesia & Malaysia Soetoto, Erwin Owan Hermansyah
International Journal of Law Reconstruction Vol 8, No 2 (2024): International Journal of Law Reconstruction
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/ijlr.v8i2.40615

Abstract

The regulations on online buying and selling as an effort to adapt to the development of the global digital economy. Although Indonesia and Malaysia are in the same region, they have different legal approaches applied in online buying and selling agreements. The purpose of this study is to analyze the regulation of online buying and selling agreements in Indonesia and Malaysia, as well as to analyze the ideal regulation of online buying and selling agreements in Indonesia in the future. The approach method in this study uses a normative legal approach. The results of this study are that Indonesia can adopt security in transactions applied in Malaysia by using electronic signatures as a mandatory component in online buying and selling transactions. In the future, regulations regarding electronic signatures will be strengthened by requiring their use in online buying and selling transactions. With the obligation to use digital signatures, each party involved in the transaction will have a verified identity. This will reduce the risk of fraud and data manipulation in online buying and selling transactions.
Legal Responsibility Of Parents For Children Who Commit Traffic Violations And Cause Traffic Accidents Hasiholan, Bengat; Sinaulan, Lina; Soetoto, Erwin Owan Hermansyah
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 11 No 1 (2025): April
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v11i1.8001

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the juvenile justice system that regulates parental responsibility for traffic violations resulting in accidents. The research employs an approach designed to provide a comprehensive analysis of the legal issues under investigation. The methods used include the statute approach to examine relevant regulations, the case approach to analyze court rulings, and the conceptual approach to understand the legal concepts underlying the norm-setting of a regulation. The legal material analysis is conducted by organizing and categorizing data based on specific patterns, allowing for in-depth conclusions regarding parental responsibility for children who come into conflict with the law due to traffic violations. The findings reveal that an examination of Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System indicates that parents have a responsibility in the diversion process for children who commit criminal offenses. This responsibility includes providing consent in the diversion agreement, compensating the victim, and participating in education, training, or community service. However, for traffic offenses regulated in Article 311, paragraphs 4 and 5 of Law Number 22 of 2009, diversion cannot be applied as the criminal penalty exceeds seven years. In Verdict Number 26/Pid.Sus-Anak/2019/PN.Jap, Marlon Stalone Tan Subay was found guilty of violating Article 311, paragraph 4, making diversion inapplicable. The juvenile justice process was still conducted under the principles of restorative justice, covering stages from investigation to trial. The judge considered deterrent effects and the learning process for the child to prevent repeating similar offenses. Parents continue to play a crucial role in educating, guiding, and supervising their children to prevent future legal violations.
Analisis Penyelesaian Permasalahan Hukum Terkait Tindak Pidana Pengalihan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Kepada Pihak Ketiga Pratama, Adi; Soetoto, Erwin Owan Hermansyah; Atmoko, Dwi
Action Research Literate Vol. 7 No. 12 (2023): Action Research Literate
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/arl.v7i12.225

Abstract

Penelitian ini penting dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui tentang analisis penyelesaian permasalahan hukum terkait tindak pidana pengalihan objek jaminan fidusia kepada pihak ketiga. Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia (selanjutnya disingkat UUJF) merupakan produk hukum yang dijadikan ketentuan hukum yang menjamin kepastian hukum serta mampu memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi para pihak yang berkepentingan. Disamping maraknya kasus penyalahgunaan hak yang banyak terjadi dalam masyarakat terutama dalam segi perjanjian jaminan fidusia, seperti kasus pengalihan objek jaminan fidusia yang dilakukan oleh debitor selaku pemberi fidusia tanpa persetujuan kreditor selaku penerima fidusia, hal ini terbukti telah melenceng dari ketentuan pasal 23 ayat (2) UUJF yaitu “Pemberi Fidusia dilarang mengalihkan, menggadaikan, atau menyewakan kapada pihak lain Benda yang menjadi objek Jaminan Fidusia yang tidak merupakan benda persediaan, kecuali dengan persetujuan tertulis terlebih dahulu dari Penerima Fidusia”. Dengan menggunakan jenis penelitian kualitatif didukung dengan metode normatif empiris Hasil penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa penyelesaian hukum terkait tindak pidana pengalihan objek jaminan fidusia tanpa persetujuan kreditor dapat diselesaikan baik melalui hukum perdata maupun hukum pidana, namun dalam ketentuannya debitor telah melanggar Pasal 23 ayat (2) maka dapat ditempuh jalur hukum sesuai dengan ketentuan pada Pasal 36 UUJF dan Pasal 372 KUHP. Serta perlindungan hukum dalam perjanjian fidusia muncul terhadap perjanjian yang telah didaftarkan dan memiliki akta jaminan fidusia, dan perlindungan hukum terhadap kreditor di dalam UUJF belum diatur secara signifikan terkait apa saja jenis perlindungannya, namun demikian di dalam UUJF telah terdapat pasal-pasal yang menegaskan terkait larangan-larangan yang wajib ditaati oleh debitor sehingga hal ini dapat memberikan jaminan kepada kreditor untuk memperoleh perlindungan hukum.