Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Pembebanan Hak Tanggungan pada Hak Guna Bangunan diatas Hak Milik Nastiti, Althea salza; Darmawan, Madeleine Evania; Irawan, Deny; Arifah, Nurmalita Fajar
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol 5 No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2385

Abstract

Debt guarantees attached to building use rights above property rights are prone to problems, especially if there is default or there has been no repayment but the building use rights have expired. Based on that, this study aims to analyze the imposition of Mortgage Rights on land with building use rights on property rights and explain the legal protection for creditors as the holder of Mortgage Rights. The type of research that will be used is normative research. In this study will use a statutory approach or statute approach. The data collection technique used was literature study with prescriptive analysis techniques. The results of this study indicate that building use rights over property rights can be charged with mortgage rights. The creditor as the party holding the Mortgage must apply the precautionary principle in the event of default by the debtor. As for the legal protection that can be applied to the imposition of Mortgage Rights on building use rights over property rights through the Deed of Granting Mortgage Rights. This is to accommodate if the process of carrying out the Mortgage auction takes a long time, so that it will affect the term of the right to use the building over the right of ownership. Creditors are also given the authority to renew building use rights over property rights as one of the efforts to prevent the erasure of building use rights over said property rights.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 47 K/TUN/2020 MENGENAI TUMPANG TINDIH ANTARA IZIN USAHA PERTAMBANGAN (IUP) DENGAN HAK GUNA USAHA (HGU) PERKEBUNAN Nastiti, Althea Salza; Tamsil, Tamsil
NOVUM : JURNAL HUKUM Vol. 10 No. 01 (2023): Novum : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.2674/novum.v0i0.45687

Abstract

Sengketa yang terjadi antara PT. Brian Anjat Sentosa melawan PT. Sasana Yudha Bhakti merupakan bukti terjadinya tumpang tindih Hak Guna Usaha (HGB) dan Izin Usaha Pertambangan (IUP). SHGU No. 116 tertanggal 29 Oktober 2009 dan SHGU No. 147 tertanggal 29 September 2010 milik PT. Sasana Yudha Bhakti diketahui merupakan wilayah yang sama dengan IUP Operasi Produksi tertanggal 8 Mei 2018 milik PT. Brian Anjat Sentosa. Hingga perkara pada tingkat kasasi pada Putusan No. 47 K/TUN/2018, hakim memutuskan yang pada intinya SHGU No. 116 harus dibatalkan, Pasal 137 Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara menyatakan jika IUP bukanlah merupakan bukti atau tanda kepimilikan hak atas tanah. Penelitian ini bertujuan memahami pertimbangan hakim dan akibat hukum dari Putusan No. 47 K/TUN/2018. Penelitian ini termasuk dalam penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Penelitian menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Pengumpulan bahan hukum dilakukan melalui studi kepustakaan dengan metode analisis bahan hukum secara deskriptif preskritif. Hasil penelitian adalah diketahui pertimbangan hakim yang seharusnya diberikan berdasarkan berdasarkan peristiwa hukum dan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku.
Pembebanan Hak Tanggungan pada Hak Guna Bangunan diatas Hak Milik Nastiti, Althea salza; Darmawan, Madeleine Evania; Irawan, Deny; Arifah, Nurmalita Fajar
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2385

Abstract

Debt guarantees attached to building use rights above property rights are prone to problems, especially if there is default or there has been no repayment but the building use rights have expired. Based on that, this study aims to analyze the imposition of Mortgage Rights on land with building use rights on property rights and explain the legal protection for creditors as the holder of Mortgage Rights. The type of research that will be used is normative research. In this study will use a statutory approach or statute approach. The data collection technique used was literature study with prescriptive analysis techniques. The results of this study indicate that building use rights over property rights can be charged with mortgage rights. The creditor as the party holding the Mortgage must apply the precautionary principle in the event of default by the debtor. As for the legal protection that can be applied to the imposition of Mortgage Rights on building use rights over property rights through the Deed of Granting Mortgage Rights. This is to accommodate if the process of carrying out the Mortgage auction takes a long time, so that it will affect the term of the right to use the building over the right of ownership. Creditors are also given the authority to renew building use rights over property rights as one of the efforts to prevent the erasure of building use rights over said property rights.