Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

State Security Vs Human Security: Which Should Prioritize The State or The Individual? Anggayudha, Zaihan Harmaen; Rafsanjani, Jody Imam
Operations Research: International Conference Series Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): Operations Research International Conference Series (ORICS), June 2023
Publisher : Indonesian Operations Research Association (IORA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47194/orics.v4i2.226

Abstract

Nowadays, the concept of human security is an issue that is often discussed, especially when issues regarding policies or how a country deals with the Covid-19 pandemic make headlines in every news report. The concept of human security shifts the focus point of security which previously focused on the state to become towards individuals. Often various discussions collide these two concepts under the pretext of finding the best way for the state to make an appropriate policy, especially during emergencies such as problems caused by the Covid-19 Pandemic. So to solve this problem it is necessary to re-understand the priorities in the security of a country in an emergency situation, especially in Indonesia. This paper aims to find out what is prioritized by the state in the event of an emergency. Literature study or desk research becomes a research method, accompanied by a conceptual and regulatory approach, then secondary data is analyzed descriptively. Based on the research, it was concluded that the concept of state security or human security should not be made as if they are contradictory but instead complement one another and become a thinking construct for the state to determine a priority in order to achieve common interests through an insecurity faced in an emergency situation. The state as the shelter of an individual certainly needs to be a top priority without neglecting the security of every individual in it. The difference in focus on the concept of state security and human security should not make both of them an option.
Hustle Culture: Celah Pelanggaran terhadap Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Nugrahani, Ellen Lutya Putri; Rafsanjani, Jody Imam; Anggayudha, Zaihan Harmaen; Nasution, Hilmi Ardani
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 25, No 1 (2025): March Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2025.V25.19-34

Abstract

Hustle Culture promotes hard work and exceeding standard working hours as a pathway to career success. However, it is often exploited to justify practices that violate labor laws, such as forcing employees to work beyond regulated hours without fair overtime pay or compensation. While seen as a driver of productivity, Hustle Culture risks undermining workers’ rights and well-being. This article examines how companies misuse Hustle Culture to manipulate employees into working excessively, potentially breaching labor laws. It also explores the balance between hard work and the protection of workers’ rights, emphasizing the need for healthy and sustainable work environments. Using a normative method with a qualitative descriptive approach, the study analyzes relevant legal documents. Findings indicate that Hustle Culture can be weaponized by employers to coerce excessive labor, disregarding the negative impacts on workers’ physical and mental health. Such practices not only harm employee welfare but also risk violating labor laws on working hours and overtime pay. This research highlights the importance of aligning workplace expectations with legal protections to ensure fair treatment and long-term sustainability in professional environments.
Zero Overstaying: Harapan Baru Pasca Lahirnya Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 Tentang Pemasyarakatan Prasetio, Rizki Bagus; Waskita, Renny; Rafsanjani, Jody Imam; Anggayudha, Zaihan Harmaen
Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Vol 17, No 2 (2023): July Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Research and Development Agency

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/kebijakan.2023.V17.111-134

Abstract

In practice, the release of detainees by law has not been optimal, and it results in overstaying. The authority of the head of the detention center to release detainees has diminished, leading to administrative procedures and coordination issues among law enforcers. This study addresses and analyzes the problem, exploring improvements following the enactment of Law 22 of 2022 on Corrections. Adopting a normative juridical research approach, it examines the extensive discretion granted by the Criminal Procedure Code to law enforcers, often prioritizing detention without considering alternatives. Inefficient coordination during detainee release, delays in responding to expiration notices, and non-compliant implementing regulations highlight system inefficiency. This causes hesitation in releasing detainees and discomfort with other law enforcement agencies. The Special Prison Planning Team and a stronger correctional system aim to promote collaboration and equal footing. Stricter regulations are necessary to protect detainees’ rights on release and provide tailored services.