Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM UIR LAW REVIEW Jurnal Selat
Rahdiansyah Rahdiansyah
Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Riau
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Deliberation, Southeast Asian Local Wisdom in Resolving Disputes Rahdiansyah Rahdiansyah; Yulia Nizwana
UIR Law Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (9.114 KB) | DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2019.vol3(02).4557

Abstract

Cultural disputes, and others, often occur between neighboring countries in Southeast Asia and can be the seeds of disharmony, of course, this is not desirable. Southeast Asia as a cultural scope that is interrelated in history, has local wisdom in resolving disputes, resolving this dispute is known as deliberation. Deliberation is an identity that must be prioritized as a wise cultural approach for the ASEAN community. The purpose of this study is to explore the local wisdom of Southeast Asian people in resolving disputes in their communities and implementing them as a solution for the ASEAN community. Recognizing each other as cultural origins often occur between Malaysian and Indonesian communities. As a nation of the same family, this is commonplace, but the most important thing is how to solve it. Interviewing the people of both countries is the first thing to do in looking at this problem, how they understand and see culture in their culture. Questionnaires are distributed as much as possible, each data obtained will be processed and classified according to nationality, education, age, and others. The findings will be a study to see the perspectives of the two countries in understanding history, culture, and cultural results in addressing the differences of opinion that occur. At least the description of the root of the problem is obtained, why this problem occurs, what are the main causes, how to understand it, how to react to it, and lead to the resolution of the dispute over ownership of culture itself
"Menghidupkan" Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Tanpa Amandemen Wira Atma Hajri; Rahdiansyah Rahdiansyah
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 24 No. 4: OKTOBER 2017
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss4.art3

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji tentang penyebab sulitnya amendemen kelima UUD 1945 dan mengkaji cara lain untuk mewujudkan UUD 1945 sebagai konstitusi yang hidup tanpa melalui prosedur formal. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, konsep, sosiologis, politik, dan pendekatan sejarah. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa sulitnya menghidupkan UUD 1945 melalui amendemen kelima dikarenakan prosedur formal perubahan UUD 1945 yang terlalu rigid, amendemen kelima tidak mendapatkan dukungan politik, dan persoalan momentum yang belum tepat. Kendatipun demikian, ada cara lain yang dapat ditempuh untuk mewujudkan UUD 1945 sebagai konstitusi hidup yaitu melalui pengaturan di dalam undang-undang, melalui interpretasi hakim konstitusi, dan melalui konvensi ketatanegaraan.
“Menggugat” Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-XIV/2016 Wira Atma Hajri; Rahdiansyah Rahdiansyah
Jurnal Selat Vol. 9 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Selat
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31629/selat.v9i2.3834

Abstract

Through Decision Number 46/PUU-XIV/2016, the Constitutional Court affirms that the Constitutional Court is not authorized to extend a legal norm or create a new norm, even though the tested norm is related to the blessing of this nation, namely adultery. Therefore, this research aims to determine whether or not the Constitutional Court can form a new norm in cases of judicial review. This research is a legal search that uses a statutory approach, a sociological approach, a historical approach, a conceptual approach, and a comparative approach. The Constitutional Court can form new norms for several reasons, namely the existence of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 48/PUU-IX/2011 which cancels articles regarding the prohibition of the Constitutional Court to form new norms, legal politics of judicial power in Indonesia, the need for law in society, and the practice that has occurred so far in which the Constitutional Court has several times established new norms. However, the most important reason is the existence of Article 29 Paragraph 1 of the 1945 Constitution as the main basis for the state to state that the State is based on One Godhead. The consequence is that things that smell of immorality must not be allowed to live in Indonesia. Disobedience certainly brings anger from Allah.
Co-Authors Wira Atma Hajri Wira Atma Hajri Yulia Nizwana