Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LITE: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya E-Structural
Hanna Latifani Daniarsa
Universitas Dian Nuswantoro
Arts Humanities Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Perubahan Makna Kata Cebong Menjelang Pemilu 2019 Marhan Pebrianto; Hanna Latifani Daniarsa; Lo Leonardo Theophilus Hielyand; Anisa Larassati
LITE: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya Vol 15, No 2 (2019): September
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (748.212 KB) | DOI: 10.33633/lite.v15i2.2610

Abstract

Menjelang dilaksanakannya pemilihan umum pada 17 April 2019, banyak fenomena sosial yang muncul. Salah satunya adalah fenomena Bahasa berupa   umpatan-umpatan yang ditujukan kepada calon presiden dan pendukungnya. Salah satu umpatan yang muncul berupa penyebutan kata cebong bagi pasangan calon presiden nomor 01 dan pendukungnya. Kata cebong yang sebelumnya tidak umum digunakan sebagai kata umpatan, kini mengalami perubahan makna yang cukup signifikan. Dalam penelitian ini, peneliti mengguakan aplikasi AntConc untuk mengetahui kolokasi kelas kata dan frasa yang sering muncul dengan kata cebong tersebut. Selain itu, peneliti juga menjelaskan proses perubahan makna kata cebong dengan menggunakan teori dari (Chaer, 2009) sebagai acuan utama. Data yang digunakan berupa komentar dan caption pengguna Instagram dalam akun @Fakta_Elite dalam postingannya dari bulan Oktober hingga Desember 2018. Metode yang digunkan dalam penelitian ini adalah deskritif-kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kata cebong yang keluar sering bersamaan dengan kata benda berupa rezim, akun, kubu, dan sebagainya. Kata sifat yang muncul berupa dungu, betina, panik, dan frasa semisal cebong dungu akut. Proses perubahan kata cebong ini termasuk proses perubahan makna total yang dilatar belakangi oleh adanya proses asosiasi dan pengembangan istilah. Kata cebong tersebut bermakna ketidaksukaan atau kritik terhadap calon presiden nomor urut 01 dan para pendukungnya.
Appraisal Analysis of Tempo’s and Kompas’ Editorials on Papua Cases Hanna Latifani Daniarsa; Sri Mulatsih
E-Structural (English Studies on Translation, Culture, Literature, and Linguistics) Vol 3, No 01 (2020): June 2020
Publisher : Universitas Dian Nuswantoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33633/es.v3i01.3636

Abstract

This study is entitled Appraisal Analysis of Tempo’s and Kompas’ Editorials on Papua Cases. This research aims to find what kind of appraisal items used in Tempo’s editorial entitled “Misunderstanding Papua” and in Kompas’ entitled “Exodus and Urgent Action”, as well as to describe the differences between them in term of appraisal. Descriptive qualitative were used as the research method. Martin and White (2005) and Martin and Rose (2007) theories regarding appraisal are used as the theoretical framework. Firstly, the editorials that talked about Papuan demonstration in September 23, 2019 were collected from Tempo’s and Kompas’ website. The data obtained were analyzed by identifying the appraising items in each clause. Then, the clauses containing appraising items were classified into the appropriate kind of appraisal items. After that, each appraisal items found were explained and the meaning behind were interpreted. And the last, drew the conclusion. The result reveals that in term of attitude, Tempo’s editorial uses more negative judgement and the appraised item is mostly the government. It shows that Tempo is not afraid to criticize the government. Meanwhile Kompas uses more negative affect and the appraised items are mainly Papuan people and the condition in Papua. It shows that Kompas chooses to express their sympathy more to those affected by the riots. In term of graduation, both editorials use more force than focus, especially intensification, to raise/emphasize their evaluation. As for engagement, Tempo and Kompas use more monogloss than heterogloss. This shows that opinions from both editorials mostly come from the writer only.Keywords: Appraisal, Attitude, Graduation, Engagement, Editorial
Co-Authors Anisa Larassati Lo Leonardo Theophilus Hielyand Marhan Pebrianto Muhammad Agus Muljanto