Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan
Muhammad Reza Winata
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
LEGAL HISTORIS KEWENANGAN PENGUJIAN DAN PEMBATALAN PERATURAN DAERAH SERTA IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP KEMUDAHAN BERUSAHA Muhammad Reza Winata; Mery Christian Putri; Zaka Firma Aditya
Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Vol 7, No 3 (2018): Desember 2018
Publisher : Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3661.77 KB) | DOI: 10.33331/rechtsvinding.v7i3.266

Abstract

Harmonisasi Peraturan Pusat dan Peraturan Daerah (Perda) penting dilakukan untuk mendukung peningkatan kemudahan berusaha di Indonesia. Hal ini juga dipengaruhi oleh kewenangan pengujian dan pembatalan Perda yang menghambat kemudahan berusaha. Tulisan ini hendak membahas mengenai legal historis pengaturan pengujian dan pembatalan Perda, serta dampak putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) Nomor 137/PUU-XIII/2015 dan Putusan Nomor 56/PUU-XIV/2016 terhadap kemudahan berusaha di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif yang bersifat preskriptif analitis dengan pendekatan regulasi, doktrinal, dan putusan. Hasil penelitian menunjukan secara legal historis kewenangan Pemerintah Pusat menguji dan membatalkan Perda mengalami dinamika sampai akhirnya kewenangan ini ekslusif hanya dimiliki kepada Mahkamah Agung. Penghapusan kewenangan  Pemerintah Pusat menguji dan membatalkan Perda yang dianggap menghambat investasi akan berimplikasi negatif terhadap kemudahan berusaha dan dapat menurunkan rangking Ease of Doing Business Indonesia. 
CRIMINAL LEGAL POLICY AND UNCONSTITUTIONALITY ON CONTEMPT OF RULER OR PUBLIC BODY Muhammad Reza Winata; Erlina M. C. Sinaga; Sharfina Sabila; Rizkisyabana Yulistyaputri
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 9, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.9.1.2020.71-98

Abstract

Contempt of ruler or public body are criminal offence which stipulated in article 207 and 208 Penal Code of Indonesia. In practice, there is legal uncertainty because substantially contradict to Constitutional Court Decision No.013-022/PUU-IV/2006 about contempt of President/ Vice President and No. 6/PUU-V/2007 about contempt of Indonesia Government. This paper wants to found criminal legal policy and constitutionality on contempt of ruler or public body. The research method used is juridical normative with regulation, doctrinal, and decision approaches. The result of study shows changes of criminal law policy on contempt of ruler or public body based on comparison of current Penal Code and future Penal Code Draft with changes elements of formulation: (1) suspect; (2) intention; (3) victim; (4) sanction; (5) impact of action, the norms also transform from general offence to complaint offense. Next, analysis to Constitutional Court decisions about contempt of President/Vice President and Indonesia Government which declared null and void, found related legal reasoning: First, violate freedom of expression; Second, violate right to get information; Third, causing legal uncertainty; Fourth, no longer suitable with society development; Fifth, changes in norms on Criminal Code Draft; Sixth; follow previous decision; Seventh, against universal value in international law. Then, the constitutional interpretation methods used in the decisions are: (1) Ethical Interpretation; (2) Historical Interpretation; (3) Futuristic Interpretation; (4) Doctrinal Interpretation. Therefore, according on similar legal reasoning and constitutional interpretation, article 207 and 208 Penal Code also supposed to be stated unconstitutional.
Co-Authors Erlina M. C. Sinaga Mery Christian Putri Rizkisyabana Yulistyaputri Sharfina Sabila Zaka Firma Aditya