Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Indonesian Constitutional Studies
Zaka Firma Aditya
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
LEGAL HISTORIS KEWENANGAN PENGUJIAN DAN PEMBATALAN PERATURAN DAERAH SERTA IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP KEMUDAHAN BERUSAHA Muhammad Reza Winata; Mery Christian Putri; Zaka Firma Aditya
Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Vol 7, No 3 (2018): Desember 2018
Publisher : Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3661.77 KB) | DOI: 10.33331/rechtsvinding.v7i3.266

Abstract

Harmonisasi Peraturan Pusat dan Peraturan Daerah (Perda) penting dilakukan untuk mendukung peningkatan kemudahan berusaha di Indonesia. Hal ini juga dipengaruhi oleh kewenangan pengujian dan pembatalan Perda yang menghambat kemudahan berusaha. Tulisan ini hendak membahas mengenai legal historis pengaturan pengujian dan pembatalan Perda, serta dampak putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) Nomor 137/PUU-XIII/2015 dan Putusan Nomor 56/PUU-XIV/2016 terhadap kemudahan berusaha di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif yang bersifat preskriptif analitis dengan pendekatan regulasi, doktrinal, dan putusan. Hasil penelitian menunjukan secara legal historis kewenangan Pemerintah Pusat menguji dan membatalkan Perda mengalami dinamika sampai akhirnya kewenangan ini ekslusif hanya dimiliki kepada Mahkamah Agung. Penghapusan kewenangan  Pemerintah Pusat menguji dan membatalkan Perda yang dianggap menghambat investasi akan berimplikasi negatif terhadap kemudahan berusaha dan dapat menurunkan rangking Ease of Doing Business Indonesia. 
Faith, Fear, and the Constitution: Religious Freedom and Identity Politics in Indonesia’s Constitutional Jurisprudence Muhtar Said; Ridwan Arifin; Zaka Firma Aditya
Indonesian Constitutional Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Indonesian Constitutional Studies, April 2025
Publisher : ARTES LIBRES INSTITUTUM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study investigates how Indonesia’s Constitutional Court has navigated the dialectic of faith, fear, and the Constitution in its jurisprudence on religious freedom, with particular attention to the implications for pluralism and democratic sustainability. The primary objective is to assess whether the Court has upheld constitutional guarantees of religious liberty or accommodated majoritarian pressures by institutionalizing fear as a constitutional principle. Employing a normative legal research method, the study draws upon a statute approach to analyze constitutional provisions, a case approach to scrutinize landmark decisions such as the 2010 Blasphemy Law ruling, a conceptual approach grounded in theories of constitutional pluralism and militant democracy, and a comparative approach referencing jurisprudence in India, Europe, and North America. The results reveal that while the Court affirms religious freedom in principle, its jurisprudence selectively protects faith, privileging majority interpretations and relegating minority beliefs to conditional entitlements. Fear of unrest and disorder has become a central justification for rights restrictions, reshaping constitutional protections into negotiable privileges rather than universal guarantees. The findings demonstrate that the Constitution itself functions as both a site of principle and pragmatism, oscillating between normative commitments to equality and pragmatic deference to political pressures. Sustainable constitutionalism in Indonesia requires reinterpreting the Constitution as a guarantor of pluralism, reinforcing judicial courage, and embedding international human rights standards into domestic jurisprudence. This research contributes to global debates on religion, identity politics, and constitutional democracy in plural societies.
Co-Authors Mery Christian Putri Muhammad Reza Winata Muhtar Said Ridwan Arifin