Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Publisia: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu
Marliana Eka Fauzia
Universitas Merdeka Malang
Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis kondisi akses ketersediaan pangan rumah tangga saat pandemi Covid-19 di Kabupaten Malang Marliana Eka Fauzia; Elfrida Br Silalahi
Publisia: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik Vol 7, No 1: April 2022
Publisher : Universitas Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/pjiap.v7i1.7574

Abstract

The discussion of this research is about the food availability of Malang Regency families during the Covid-19 pandemic. Food security is a crucial issue during the Covid-19 pandemic because it involves affordability of food access, considering the government is currently implementing social restrictions in various regions in Indonesia. The purpose of this study is to analyze changes in access to food availability for the people of Malang Regency in meeting the food needs of the family. As an analytical knife, the researcher uses a literature review regarding access to food availability and literacy regarding the impact of COVID-19 on food. The method used is qualitative with a phenomenological approach. The results of this study indicate that the Malang Regency Government provides direct access and also social access in assisting households in accessing food needs. By ensuring food stability, providing nutrition for vulnerable people/groups and reviewing trade taxes.  
Manajemen konflik warga Sukoharjo dalam menyelamatkan lingkungan terhadap pencemaran udara dan air oleh PT. RUM Marliana Eka Fauzia; Elfrida BR. Silalahi
Publisia: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik Vol 6, No 1: April 2021
Publisher : Universitas Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/pjiap.v6i1.5635

Abstract

Writing about conflict management is based on the presence of waste pollution both air and water in Ngunter District, Sukoharjo Regency. The pollution waste is in indication of PT RUM, which operates in the field of industrial fiber rayon. Based on this, the author aims to determine the model or method conflict management for Sukoharjo residents regarding waste issues with PT RUM. As a conceptual basis, the writer uses conflict theory and conflict management. Whereas for method study author uses qualitative descriptive as well as with the model research the data using the study of literacy. The results of this study indicate that conflicts that occur between PT RUM and citizens sub district Ngunter , District Sukoharjo including conflict of objectives, things have views of the causes of conflict due to social factors. Factor socially the views of the many people who Felt the pollution of waste that is suspected of PT RUM thus causing the quality of water and air decreases and also attacked the health of the people around. In the process of settlement of conflict pollution environment is resident Sukoharjo get the support of the third well of the institution of government in spite of non- governmental. Government agencies such as the Regent, DPRD, KLHK, and Kominfo . While the institution of non-governmental as well as LBH Semarang, Komnas HAM and Ombudsmen. So the management of conflict is expected to Minimize losses with the conflict that. In addition it is also a model of management of conflicts of citizens Sukoharjo can be said integrative since the onset of the conflict on the outside of the will of the citizens.
Mengembalikan Tahapan Uji Publik Pada Pilkada: Gagasan Memperluas Ruang Publik Yang Deliberatif Marliana Eka Fauzia
Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020): Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu
Publisher : Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (827.511 KB) | DOI: 10.55108/jap.v3i2.14

Abstract

The writing of this article is intended to evaluate the urgency of revising the Pilkada Law, on eliminating public examination points. The DPR removed public test points in the revision of the Election Law No. 1 of 2015, and was replaced by the Election Law No. 8 of 2015. Until the current election law No. 10 of 2016 there has been no re-discussion regarding the stages of public testing. The public test is a stage of competency and integrity testing for candidates for regional head and representative in an open manner which is independently formed by the Provincial / Regency / City KPU. Public test points were removed on the grounds that they were inefficient and time consuming. Based on this, the authors identify that the elimination of public testing can limit public participation in deliberative public spaces. And if the public test is returned at the election stage, it can improve the quality of democracy. As a theoretical review in this article the writer uses the concept of public space. While the research method uses qualitative through literature study. The results of this paper indicate that it is important to maintain a public test mechanism to restore the public space for the implementation of the elections. The existence of this public space ensures that there is space for public participation, the public can find out the track record of the candidates, build communication between candidates and voters and that public trials can be used as a deliberative campaign. Therefore, the public test can be returned to the election mechanism by adding a committee from various elements of society (farmers, laborers, entrepreneurs, village heads, educators, students and other elements of civil society). So that the public test becomes the preliminary election before the election day takes place.
Co-Authors Silalahi, Elfrida BR.