Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.578
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pilar JURNAL KOLABORASI Journal of Government and Civil Society MATAPPA: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Celebes Abdimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat JPPM: Journal of Public Policy and Management Journal of Government and Political Issues
Abdi Abdi
Department Of Public Administration, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
Religion Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Strategi Kehumasan Dalam Pelayanan Informasi Publik Di Pusat Pelatihan Dan Pengembangan Dan Kajian Manajemen Pemerintahan Lembaga Administrasi Negara Sri Kartika; Abdi Abdi; Nasrulhaq Nasrulhaq
Kolaborasi : Jurnal Administrasi Publik Vol 9, No 1 (2023): April 2023
Publisher : Department of Public Administration, Muhammadiyah University of Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26618/kjap.v9i1.10644

Abstract

The study aimed to discover the public relations strategy in public information services at the Center for Training and Development and Government Management Studies at the State Administration Agency (Puslatbang KMP LAN). Data were obtained through data collection techniques using observation, interviews, and documentation studies which were carried out with data analysis techniques consisting of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusions. The results showed that aspects of 1) problem definition, namely the information media managed by public relations was not yet fully known by stakeholders, so that information was not conveyed thoroughly; 2) planning and programming, namely public relations coordinating with teaching facilitators to socialise the social media and connecting every social media; 3) action and communication, namely public relations conducting two-way communication to stakeholders, public relations using electronic and non-electronic media in inserting social media so that stakeholders know the information funnel and public relations utilising several of social media in disseminating information; 4) evaluation, namely that all social media had been known to stakeholders and could be accessed so that comprehensive and up-to-date information was achieved.
Ethical Mechanisms in Preventing Bureaucratic Corruption: A Comparative Study across Indonesian Government Institutions Abdi Abdi; Hafiz Elfiansya Parawu; Nursaleh Hartaman
Journal of Government and Civil Society Vol 9 No 2 (2025): Journal of Government and Civil Society (October)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31000/jgcs.v9i2.14541

Abstract

Bureaucratic corruption in Indonesia remains a serious problem despite the establishment of various oversight institutions since the 1998 Reform era. This article aims to analyze the role of ethical mechanisms in preventing bureaucratic corruption through a comparative study of three main institutions: Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia (ORI), and Inspectorate General (Itjen) within the ministry. This research uses a qualitative approach with literature study methods, analysis of official documents, and utilization of online data from credible sources. The findings show that the implementation of bureaucratic ethics plays a significant role in reducing the potential for corruptive behavior. KPK implements a strict internal code of ethics and manages various integrity strengthening programs such as the Integrity Assessment Survey (SPI) and Integrity Zone (ZI) to instill an anti-corruption culture within the government. ORI focuses on preventing maladministration and enforcing ethical standards in public services, which serves as a bulwark against petty corruption. Meanwhile, Itjen carries out the function of internal supervision and fostering the integrity of the state civil apparatus (ASN), although it faces challenges in terms of independence and limited resources. Comparatively, the three institutions complement each other. KPK has an advantage in terms of national prosecution and coordination, ORI excels in monitoring public service ethics, and Itjen plays a role in early detection of internal bureaucratic irregularities. Ethical mechanisms such as the implementation of a code of ethics, the development of an integrity system, and the implementation of ethics-based supervision have proven effective in improving accountability and preventing bureaucratic corruption.Korupsi birokrasi di Indonesia masih menjadi persoalan serius meskipun berbagai lembaga pengawas telah dibentuk sejak era Reformasi 1998. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran mekanisme etik dalam mencegah korupsi birokrasi melalui studi komparatif terhadap tiga institusi utama: Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK), Ombudsman Republik Indonesia (ORI), dan Inspektorat Jenderal (Itjen) di lingkungan kementerian. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode studi literatur, analisis dokumen resmi, serta pemanfaatan data daring dari sumber yang kredibel. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa penerapan etika birokrasi berperan signifikan dalam mengurangi potensi perilaku koruptif. KPK menerapkan kode etik internal yang ketat serta mengelola berbagai program penguatan integritas seperti Survei Penilaian Integritas (SPI) dan Zona Integritas (ZI) guna menanamkan budaya antikorupsi di lingkungan pemerintah. ORI berfokus pada pencegahan maladministrasi dan penegakan standar etika pelayanan publik, yang menjadi benteng terhadap praktik korupsi kecil (petty corruption). Sementara itu, Itjen menjalankan fungsi pengawasan internal dan pembinaan integritas aparatur sipil negara (ASN), meskipun menghadapi tantangan pada aspek independensi dan keterbatasan sumber daya. Secara komparatif, ketiga institusi tersebut saling melengkapi. KPK memiliki keunggulan dalam hal penindakan dan koordinasi nasional, ORI unggul dalam pengawasan etika pelayanan publik, dan Itjen berperan dalam deteksi dini terhadap penyimpangan internal birokrasi. Mekanisme etik seperti penerapan kode etik, pembangunan sistem integritas, dan pelaksanaan pengawasan berbasis etika terbukti efektif dalam meningkatkan akuntabilitas dan mencegah korupsi birokrasi.
Co-Authors ., Haerana Andi Faradillah Burhanuddin, Burhanuddin Edy Gunawan Pammu Eka Susanti Fatmawati Fatmawati Hafiz Elfiansya Parawu Hardi, Rudi Isra Amartiwi Muhammad Amar Pratama Muhammad Asrul Muhammad Isa Ansyari Musfira Basri Nasrul Haq Nasrulhaq Nasrulhaq Nursaleh Hartaman Reski Elvira R Rosmiati Rosmiati Sri Fajriani Sri Kartika