Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.152
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Awang Long Law Review Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika
Hamzah Halim
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Access Rights to Health Services for Tolotang Believers as Minority Group, Sidrap District, Indonesia Iin Karita Sakharina; Aidir Amin Daud; Hamzah Halim; Muh. Hasrul; Wahyudi Pratama; Sukri Palutturi; Anif Laila Sahir
Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology Vol. 15 No. 2 (2021): Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology
Publisher : Institute of Medico-legal Publications Pvt Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37506/ijfmt.v15i2.14758

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to analyze the forms of protection and fulfillment of human rights by localgovernments against the followers of the Tolotang faith in accessing their right to health service as minoritygroup in Sidenreng Rappang District, South Sulawesi Province. The type of research used was normativelegal research using a statutory approach. The results showed that The followers of the Tolotang faith havebeen recognized by the state, and weregiven space to worship based on their beliefs. Also Tolotang faithhave recognize by the local goverment as part of the community in Sidenreng Rappang who have the sameaccess in order to get health service from any medical stuff, doctor, clinic , hospital whenever they needit.The findings of this article can provide insights into the forms of protection and fulfillment of humanrights by local governments against the followers of the Tolotang faith inin in accessing their right to healthservice as minority group in Sidenreng Rappang District, South Sulawesi Province.The followers of theTolotang faith have been recognized by the state, and weregiven space to worship based on their beliefs.Also Tolotang faith have recognize by the local goverment as part of the community in Sidenreng Rappangwho have the same access in order to get health service from any medical stuff, doctor, clinic , hospitalwhenever they need it.
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MAKASSAR CITY OMBUDSMAN DUTIES IN FOLLOWING UP ON MALADMINISTRATION CARRIED OUT BY THE REGIONAL APPARATUS ORGANIZATION ANDI BAU MEDLIN AR; HAMZAH HALIM; ZULKIFLI ASPAN
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (222.779 KB) | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v3i2.251

Abstract

This paper analyzes the implementation of the Makassar City Ombudsman duties in following up on maladministration carried out by Regional Apparatus Organizations. This type of research is empirical legal research, 2 (two) types of legal materials that the author uses, namely primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The data obtained both primary and secondary were analyzed qualitatively and presented descriptively. The results showed that the implementation of the Makassar City Ombudsman Duties in following up on Maladministration at Regional Apparatus Organizations, especially those that occurred at the Department of Population and Civil Registration had been carried out, but was not optimal, because there were still reports related to the same thing that were submitted to the Makassar City Ombudsman in the following year, namely In 2019 to 2020, this means that the Makassar City Ombudsman still needs to improve supervision to prevent maladministration at the Makassar City Education Office and the Makassar City Population and Civil Registry Office regarding the same things that have happened before in the same place.
THE APPLICATION OF ACCOUNTABILITY PRINCIPLES IN THE PROVISION OF FREE EDUCATION IN GOWA REGENCY RATIH ISTIQOMAH RAUF; HAMZAH HALIM; HASBIR PASERANGI
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (340.803 KB)

Abstract

The purpose of writing this paper is to analyze the principle of accountability in the provision of free education Gowa Regency Regulation Number 4 of 2008 and Gowa Regency Regional Regulation Number 9 of 2013. This study uses a sociojuridical research type, using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The data used are primary data and secondary data obtained through interviews and literature study, the data collected is then analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that the principle of accountability as one of the main principles of good governance has been implemented by the Gowa Regional Government in providing free education in Gowa Regency. This is evidenced by the existence of the Gowa Regency Regional Regulation Number 4 Year 2008 concerning Free Education and the Gowa Regency Regional Regulation Number 9 Year 2013 concerning Amendments to the Gowa Regency Regulation Number 10 Year 2009 concerning the Compulsory Education Program, the two provisions of the legislation in the form of Regional regulations and Regent's Regulations have become a guarantee of accountability for the provision of free education in Gowa Regency.
THE VALIDITY OF THE NOTARY DEED TO REVIEW A TYPE OF ERROR USING A PEN ERASER Yossi Islamiya Pratiwi; Hamzah Halim; Nurfaidah Said
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (300.461 KB) | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v5i1.540

Abstract

The authority of a notary is governed by the Notary Position Act in article 15 paragraph (1). In terms of erasing using a pen eraser, is not allowed and is not regulated in the Notary Position Act. However, if the minutes and copies of the deed remain the same, then the error in the deed is not a substantive error and there is no lawsuit against it. Therefore, the deed is still valid as an authentic deed. Regarding the legal consequences, whether a Notary deed is an authentic deed or not, will be decided by a judge in court.
RESTRICTIONS ON FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN INDONESIA FROM A HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE Lusty Shine La Juwi; Andi Pangerang Moenta; Hamzah Halim
Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika ISSN 2721-4796 (online) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2023)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian Dan Pengambangan Mandalika Indonesia (IP2MI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/jcm.v4i3.1870

Abstract

This research is focused on the concept of limiting freedom of speech applied in Indonesia and its comparison with restrictions on freedom of expression applied in liberal countries, namely the United States and Germany. Aiming to maintain public order in society, the restrictions are not carried out arbitrarily because they must be in accordance with laws and regulations and moral values, decency and other general values in society and aim to protect the basic rights of others. This research is normative legal research. The results of the study are, First, a comparison of restrictions on freedom between countries that adhere to liberalism (the United States and Germany) and the State of Indonesia found that there are differences in terms of regulation, where America does not include restrictions on the right to freedom of expression in its constitution but only based on jurisprudence, whereas Indonesia and Germany include arrangements for limiting the right to freedom of speech in their respective constitutions. This is because not all countries can adhere to the universal concept of human rights. Second, the forms of restrictions on freedom of opinion are regulated in laws and regulations, including in Article 28 J paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and Article 73 of Law no. 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights. Where the restrictions on the right to freedom of opinion implemented in Indonesia are in accordance with these rules and do not violate human rights because the forms of self-imposed restrictions aim to protect the rights and freedoms of others, and to remain based on moral values, decency and public order and restrictions done in the common interest of the nation.
Co-Authors Aidir Amin Daud ANDI BAU MEDLIN AR Andi Pangerang Moenta Anif Laila Sahir Hasbir Paserangi Iin Karita Sakharina Lusty Shine La Juwi Muh Makir Muh. Hasrul Nurfaidah Said RATIH ISTIQOMAH RAUF Sukri Palutturi Wahyudi Pratama Yossi Islamiya Pratiwi Zulkifli Aspan