Jatin Patel
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

An Observational Study of Propofol Mct-Lct Versus Propofol Lct with Lidocaine Pretreatment for Pain During Induction in General Anaesthesia Jatin Patel; Chandini D; Malini Mehta
Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology Vol. 15 No. 3 (2021): Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology
Publisher : Institute of Medico-legal Publications Pvt Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37506/ijfmt.v15i3.15309

Abstract

Aims and Objectives: To compare efficacy between Propofol Medium Chain Triglycerides-Long ChainTriglycerides and Propofol Long Chain Triglycerides with lidocaine pretreatment under venous occlusionon propofol induced pain.Material and Methods: 50 patients of age 18 to 55 years of either gender of ASA I or II Grade were assignedto two groups of 25 each undergoing elective surgeries under general anaesthesia.Patients in Group Mreceived Propofol MCT-LCT 1% (without any pretreatment with Lidocaine) and Group L received PropofolLCT 1% with Lidocaine pretreatment under venous occlusion. Following propofol injection, patients wereasked for any sensation of pain at injection site during propofol injection till patient was unconscious. It wasgraded as per 4 point verbal pain score, with 0 being No pain to 3 being severe pain.Anaesthesia was induced by a standard technique of intravenous induction. Endotracheal intubation wasdone after giving injection succinyl choline (2mg/kg) I V and was maintained on O2, N2O, Isofluraneand Atracurium. Monitoring of heartrate, blood pressure and SPO2 were done during the surgery . Aftersurgery, reversal of neuromuscular blockade was done and extubation was performed. After that patient wastransferred to recovery room.Result and Summary: Both the groups were comparable in term of demographics and ASA grading. It wasobserved that in the group L a significantly higher proportion (80%) of patients experienced pain while inthe Group M only 44% patients experienced pain during propofol administration. (P value-0.0044- highlysignificant). We observed that the pain intensity score seen in group L was 0, 1, 2 and 3 in 20%, 48%, 20%and 12% of the patients , while in the group M was 0 and 1 in 56% and 44% of the patients, respectively andnone of the patients had pain score of 2 and 3. A significantly higher proportion of patients in group M hadpain intensity score of 0 (P value<0.01)which was statistically highly significant. Pre and post-operativevitals were comparable in both the groups.Conclusion: The study concluded that Propofol MCT-LCT is better in view of less incidence and severityof pain on injection during induction of anaesthesia than Propofol LCT with lidocaine pretreatment undervenous occlusion.
An Observational Study to Compare Patient and Surgeon Satisfaction and Hemodynamic Changes Occurring in Spinal Anaesthesia Versus General Anaesthesia in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Surgery Jatin Patel; Juhi Jain; Kalpesh Patil; Kirti Patel
Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology Vol. 15 No. 3 (2021): Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology
Publisher : Institute of Medico-legal Publications Pvt Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37506/ijfmt.v15i3.15324

Abstract

Background:Renal stones are the most painful condition of the urological system requiring hospital admission. The treatment depends upon type, number and size of renal calculi. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) can be conducted under regional anesthesia such as spinal anesthesia (SA) as well as in general anesthesia (GA).Methodology: In this study, we selected 50 patients of ASA-I &II of either sex, 18 to 60 years undergoing PCNL surgeries.GROUP S (n=25)- PCNL under spinal anaesthesiaGROUP G (n=25)- PCNL under general anaesthesiaResult: Mean pulse rate, Mean arterial pressure and Mean oxygen saturation were significantly lower in SA group during intraoperative period as compared to GA whereas the difference in both groups were insignificant postoperatively with p<0.01 and p>0.05 respectively.Mean VAS score for patient’s satisfaction were significantly lower in SA group as compared to GA group with p<0.01.Likert’s scale for surgeon’s satisfaction were significantly higher in GA group as compared to SA group with p<0.01Conclusion: My study concluded that VAS score (patient’s satisfaction) is better in spinal anesthesia whereas hemodynamic stability and Likert’s scale (surgeon’s satisfaction) is better in general anesthesia.