Malini Mehta
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Comparative Study of Magnesium Sulphate added to Bupivacaine and Ropivacaine Local Infiltration of Wound for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Upper Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Double Blind Study Anuja Agrawal; Sujay Thakkar; Akhilesh Chhaya; Malini Mehta
Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology Vol. 15 No. 2 (2021): Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology
Publisher : Institute of Medico-legal Publications Pvt Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37506/ijfmt.v15i2.14277

Abstract

Aim: To compare subcutaneous infiltration of Inj Bupivacaine with inj MgSO4and Inj Ropivacaine withInjMgSO4 for postoperative analgesia undergoing upper abdominal surgery. Goal: To determine duration ofanalgesia, doses of rescue analgesia, VAS at different time intervals.Background: Post-operative pain is most neglected entity. We should use availableresources inoptimummanner for improving pain managementstrategies.Methods: A Prospective, double-blinded, randomized studyof 50 patients undergoing upper abdominalsurgery divided into group B and R. Infiltration was done in the subcutaneous plane by surgeon before skinclosure. Group B: Inj. Bupivacaine 50mg (10ml of 0.5% Inj . Bupivacaine) with Inj.MgSO4 500mg (1ml ofInj 50% MgSO4) diluted with NS 9 ml to make total volume of 20 ml whereas, Group R: Inj Ropivacaine50 mg (6.7 ml of 0.75% Inj. Ropivacaine) with Inj MgSO4 500 mg diluted with NS (12.3 ml) making a totalvolume of 20 ml. In postoperative period, parameters noted were vitals and Visual Analogue Score (VAS)for 24 hours.Results: In group R, moderate pain was seen in 40%of the patients at T12 whereas in group B 48% hadmoderate pain. Total no. of rescue analgesic doses required in Group R is 2.1 +/- 0.5 and in Group B is 2.6+/- 0.5 in 24 hrs and has significant differencestatistically.Conclusion: Group R had better VAS scores at T24 and reduced no.of rescue analgesic doses.
An Observational Study of Propofol Mct-Lct Versus Propofol Lct with Lidocaine Pretreatment for Pain During Induction in General Anaesthesia Jatin Patel; Chandini D; Malini Mehta
Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology Vol. 15 No. 3 (2021): Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology
Publisher : Institute of Medico-legal Publications Pvt Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37506/ijfmt.v15i3.15309

Abstract

Aims and Objectives: To compare efficacy between Propofol Medium Chain Triglycerides-Long ChainTriglycerides and Propofol Long Chain Triglycerides with lidocaine pretreatment under venous occlusionon propofol induced pain.Material and Methods: 50 patients of age 18 to 55 years of either gender of ASA I or II Grade were assignedto two groups of 25 each undergoing elective surgeries under general anaesthesia.Patients in Group Mreceived Propofol MCT-LCT 1% (without any pretreatment with Lidocaine) and Group L received PropofolLCT 1% with Lidocaine pretreatment under venous occlusion. Following propofol injection, patients wereasked for any sensation of pain at injection site during propofol injection till patient was unconscious. It wasgraded as per 4 point verbal pain score, with 0 being No pain to 3 being severe pain.Anaesthesia was induced by a standard technique of intravenous induction. Endotracheal intubation wasdone after giving injection succinyl choline (2mg/kg) I V and was maintained on O2, N2O, Isofluraneand Atracurium. Monitoring of heartrate, blood pressure and SPO2 were done during the surgery . Aftersurgery, reversal of neuromuscular blockade was done and extubation was performed. After that patient wastransferred to recovery room.Result and Summary: Both the groups were comparable in term of demographics and ASA grading. It wasobserved that in the group L a significantly higher proportion (80%) of patients experienced pain while inthe Group M only 44% patients experienced pain during propofol administration. (P value-0.0044- highlysignificant). We observed that the pain intensity score seen in group L was 0, 1, 2 and 3 in 20%, 48%, 20%and 12% of the patients , while in the group M was 0 and 1 in 56% and 44% of the patients, respectively andnone of the patients had pain score of 2 and 3. A significantly higher proportion of patients in group M hadpain intensity score of 0 (P value<0.01)which was statistically highly significant. Pre and post-operativevitals were comparable in both the groups.Conclusion: The study concluded that Propofol MCT-LCT is better in view of less incidence and severityof pain on injection during induction of anaesthesia than Propofol LCT with lidocaine pretreatment undervenous occlusion.
An Observational Study between Intrathecal Fentanyl and Butorphanol with Low Dose Bupivacaine to Facilitate Early Ambulation in Perineal Surgeries Malini Mehta; Soumya Jha; Pooja Shah
Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology Vol. 15 No. 3 (2021): Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology
Publisher : Institute of Medico-legal Publications Pvt Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37506/ijfmt.v15i3.15330

Abstract

Background: Neuraxial opioids are widely used with local anaesthetics as they allow lower dose of local anaesthetics while providing adequate anaesthesia and faster recovery from spinal anaesthesia because of their sympathetic and motor nerve sparing activities. In the last few years the number of surgeries performed on an ambulatory basis has increased worldwide because of many advantages like short hospital stay, less chance of wound infection and less chances of deep vein thrombosis.Methods: 64 patients of ASA- I or II of either gender who underwent perineal surgeries were divided into two groups of 32 each:- Group BF patients received 1ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 20µg fentanyl(0.4ml) and Group BB patients received 1ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 200µg butorphanol(0.2ml) and normal saline(0.2ml).Patients were observed for onset of sensory and motor blockade, duration of sensory and motor blockade, duration of analgesia and time to unassisted ambulation. There was no difference in onset of sensory and motor blockade between the two groups(P> 0.005).Patients receiving butorphanol had statistically significantly longer duration of sensory and motor blockade and duration of analgesia than fentanyl(p-0.001).Patients receiving fentanyl were observed to ambulate unassisted significantly early compared to butorphanol (p-0.001).Conclusion: Patients receiving intrathecal fentanyl 20µg can ambulate earlier compared to patients receiving butorphanol 200µg when used as an adjuvant with low dose hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% without any complication.
An Observational Study of Intravenous Granisetron Vs Oral Gabapentin in Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting after Middle Ear Surgery Malini Mehta; Akshata Thakurdesai; Sujay Thakkar
Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology Vol. 15 No. 3 (2021): Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology
Publisher : Institute of Medico-legal Publications Pvt Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37506/ijfmt.v15i3.15334

Abstract

Background- Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is one of the most unpleasant complications after middle ear surgery. Several studies have demonstrated use of gabapentin as antiemetic. This study aims at comparison of intravenous granisetron vs oral gabapentin in preventing PONV. Methods - 64 patients of ASA I or II between the ages of 18 and 65 years were divided equally into two groups. Patients in group I received 3mg granisetron iv 2 minutes and patients in group II received 300 mg gabapentin orally 1 hour prior to surgery. Patients were premedicated with inj. glycopyrrolate and inj. midazolam. Anaesthesia was induced, maintained and reversed in usual manner. Haemodynamic changes and number of episodes of nausea and vomiting were recorded upto 24 hours postoperatively. No statistically significant difference was observed in both the groups at 0 and 1 hour in preventing PONV (p<0.05). Next 24 hours postoperatively neither group showed PONV. No significant haemodynamic changes were observed and there were noside effects in either of the groups.Conclusion- There was no statistically significant difference in prevention of PONV in the patients who had either received inj granisetron 3mg i.v. 2 minutes prior to surgery or oral Gabapentin 300mg 1hour prior to surgery after middle ear surgery without any side effects.