Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.235
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Konstitusi Constitutional Review Jurnal Yudisial DIVERSI : Jurnal Hukum JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI Cendekia : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Konstitusi
Iskandar Muda
Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas YARSI.
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Konstitusionalitas Mengenai Kekuasaan Negara dalam Kegiatan Penanaman Modal (Analisis Putusan MK No. 21- 22/PUU-V/2007) Iskandar Muda
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 6 (2011)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (417.827 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk862

Abstract

What it means by “under state control” on article 33 point (2) and (3)  of UUD 1945, should not be interpreted that the state will control totally the entire economic activities that serve the public basic; the state  is not a company refers to democratic economy of Indonesia which hinder monopoly on business by any state or etatism (state monopoly). The precise understanding of “under state control“ is state responsibility to manage and drive the economy regulation correctly.
Pro-Kontra dan Prospektif Kewenangan Uji Konstitusionalitas Perpu Iskandar Muda
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 10, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (439.858 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1014

Abstract

Pros and cons of the authority to deal with judicial constitutionality review of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perpu) either from fellow judges of the Constitutional Court (MK) or from the world of legal science is acceptable. The pros and cons is not due to the differences in interests between them, but it is caused by the differences in schools or schools of thought and interpretation methodologies adopted. The authority of the Constitutional Court to review the constitutionality of Perpu is in line with the philosophy of Judicial Activism (the concept of active understanding) which is identical to the "Statue of the Goddess of Justice" whose eyes are not closed in order to be able to watch and absorb the "sense of social justice", to incorporate the living legal values in the society, respond to the demand and aspiration of the people and, furthermore, to create “the thinking judges” which make their decisions responsive. However, the authority of the Court to review the constitutionality of the Perpu might cause “broader impacts” in the future which means that the impact will not be only on the constitutionality review of the Perpu but also on the other decisions of Constitutional Court.
Logika Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Uji Konstitusional Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Iskandar Muda
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (383.955 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1725

Abstract

Settlement of the problem of testing the law in the Constitutional Court (constitutional review) is also needed to find out the logic of the law and its relationship. If two statements are displayed simultaneously it will give rise to what by logic is called “logic relationship.” In the settlement of the six cases of constitutional review of the law on the Position of Notary Public (Law No. 30 Year 2004) and its Amendments (Law No. 2 Year 2014) revealed the use of various kinds of legal logic in legal considerations (ratio decidendi) of the Court. This research is a legal research using normative approach. The results showed that: (i) Constitutional Court Decision No. 009-014/PUU-III/2005 uses the legal logic of “equivalence relations,” (ii) Constitutional Court Decision No. 52/PUU-VIII/2010 uses the legal logic of “independent relationship,” (iii) Constitutional Court Decision No. 49/PUU-X/2012 uses the legal logic of “contradictory relationship,” (iv) Constitutional Court Decision No. 72/PUU-XII/2014 uses the legal logic of “independent relationship,” (v) Constitutional Court Decision No. 43/PUU-XV/2017 uses the legal logic of “independent relationship,” and (vi) in Constitutional Court Decision No. 22/PUU-XVII/2019 uses the legal logic of “contradictory relationship.”
Peningkatan Pemahaman Konstitusi Bagi Guru-Guru Di SMP Negeri 77 Jakarta Iskandar Muda; Frengki Hardian; Sulhan Sulhan
Cendekia : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol 2 No 2 (2020): Desember
Publisher : LPPM UNIVERSITAS ISLAM KADIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (546.707 KB) | DOI: 10.32503/cendekia.v2i2.1185

Abstract

Segala kegiatan di SMP Negeri 77 Jakarta yang berlokasi di Jl. Cempaka Putih Tengah XVII, RT. 2/RW. 8, Kelurahan Cempaka Putih Timur, Kecamatan Cempaka Putih, Kota Jakarta Pusat-Provinsi Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta adalah kegiatan yang merupakan bagian dalam konteks bernegara, dimana dalam konteks bernegara rujukan utamanya adalah konstitusi. Oleh karena itu penulis tergerak bertanggung jawab secara keilmuwan untuk meningkatkan pemahaman terhadap UUD Tahun 1945 sebagai konstitusi Indonesia bagi Guru-guru di SMP tersebut. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode participatory action, yaitu dengan cara orasi, dialog dan pendidikan. Hasil dari pre-test dan post-test secara menyeluruh tanpa mengklasifikasikan pertanyaannya ternyata terjadi peningkatan yang signifikan.
Co-Authors Frengki Hardian Mohammad Ryan Bakry Sulhan Sulhan Taufik Hidayat