Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Konsep landasan filosofis pengembangan ilmu bersumber pada nilai-nilai ke-UGM-an Heri Santoso; Koento Wibisono Siswomihardjo,; Arqom Kuswanjono
Jurnal Kawistara Vol 6, No 3 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (339.238 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/kawistara.22982

Abstract

This research is motivated by crisis, especially of UGM (Universitas Gadjah Mada) identity andof philosophical foundations of its scientific development. This study aims to inventory, analyzesynthesize, critically evaluate, as well as construct a philosophical foundation of scientific development originating in UGM values. The study employs a reflective, systematic philosophical research model.Data consists mainly of documents data, supported by field data collected through participantobservation and in-depth interviews. Material objects of research are values contained in the university’slegal basis or statute, symbols of its identity attributes, and thoughts of its leaders, while formal objectof research is philosophy, particularly philosophy of values (axiology) and philosophy of science. Datawill be analyzed using elements of methodical study of philosophy, especially interpretive analysis in aheuristic framework to come to conclusion.The results show that: First, history of ideas indicates that GMU scholars have proposed andjustified concept and model of scientific development based on GMU (Gadjah Mada University)values, that is the concept of “Pancasila as (1) guidance (2) orientation and (3) paradigm of scientificand technological development.” Scientific models that were successfully developed are (1) Pancasilaicscience and knowledge and Science of State and Law of Pancasila (Ilmu Negara dan Hukum Pancasila)by Notonagoro; (2) Pancasila Economics (Ilmu Ekonomi Pancasila) by Mubyarto; and (3) PropheticSocial Science (Ilmu Sosial Profetis) by Kuntowijoyo. Second, the concept of scientific developmentdeveloped by GMU-based scholars is actually built on basic assumptions that science is not value-freeand, thereby, teleological, i.e. acting for the sake of human civilization, usefulness, and happiness. These axiological and metaphysical assumptions are heavily influenced by a metaphysical belief that recognizes the existence and power of God. These axiological and metaphysical assumptions epistemologically imply that there is a source of knowledge and truth other than scientific knowledge and truth.
Implementasi Konsep ESD Plus Dalam Mata Kuliah Pengembangan Kepribadian (MPK) Melalui Model Training Kader Bangsa Mahasiswa Heri Santoso; Arqom Kuswanjono; Surono Surono
Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (Indonesian Journal of Community Engagement) Vol 1, No 2 (2016): Maret
Publisher : Direktorat Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (152.687 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpkm.10605

Abstract

This community service activities was designed to (1) give a critical evaluation of the concept and implementation of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and Courses on Character Development (Mata Kuliah Pengembangan Kepribadian/MPK) at universities in contemporary Indonesia and (2) to design an appropriate model of implementation of ESD concept for improving the quality of MPK program. The methods on this study are literature studies, workshop on instrument design, Focus Group Discussion (FGD), implementation of ESD concept in co-curricular activities, and evaluation. The program will be held in Center for Pancasila Studies (PSP-UGM), at Taman Makam Pahlawan Kusumanegara, Pakem Orphanage center, and scavengers community in Condongcatur. The expected results of the program are (1) a critical note on the concept and implementation of ESD and MPK at universities in Indonesia and (2) a model and module of implementation of ESD PLUS through Training Kader Bangsa (TKB) which are more adaptable and appropriate with the local genius of Indonesia.
HAKIKAT ILMU DALAM PEMIKIRAN ISLAM Arqom Kuswanjono
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 26, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.12787

Abstract

This research, entitled Essence of Religion in Islam. Many people often connote science with Western. However, if tracked historically, Islam have enormous contribution in developing of science. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the scientific character of the West and Islam, analyzing the development of science in Islamic and discover the nature of science in Islam. This is a library research using hermeneutic method with method elements are description, verstehen and interpretation. The material object is Islamic thought while the formal object is the philosophy of science. The results of this research indicate that there is a distinctive characteristic between Western science and Islam from the aspect of ontology, epistemology, and axiology. The most striking difference is the recognition of the existence of God. In its development, Islamic science actually stems from the Prophet Muhammad's own then forwarded the new companions subsequent Islamic thinkers. The nature of science in Islam includes facility, processes and objectives. Epistemologically, it means that Islam accepts ratio and sense as well as revelation and intuition, while the purpose of science is to reveal the truth in pursuit of Ultimate Truth.
ARGUMEN FILOSOFIS INTEGRASI ILMU DAN AGAMA Perspektif Pemikiran Mullâ Sadrâ Arqom Kuswanjono
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 17, No 3 (2007)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.23091

Abstract

The problem of relationship between science and religion emerged in the first time at the Middle Ages, when the controversy about the center of universe occurred between scientists and theologians, that were geocentric view and heliocentric view. It was the starting point of the discourse of relationship between science and religion academically. Than, the discourse of the relationship develop in four types i.e. conflict, independence, dialogue and integration. The concept of integration between science and religion in philosophy of Mullâ Shadrâ perspective is an holistic integration which is built upon the unity of ontology, epistemology and axiology. Ontologically, the relationship is interdependent- integration, it means that science and religion dependent each other. There is no science without religion and there is no religion without science. Epistemologically, the relationship is complementary-integration; it means that all methods which are applied in science and religion (sense experience, reason, intuition and revelation) synergically used to find out the truth. Axiologically, the relationship is qualificative-integration, it means that all values (truth, goodness, beauty and Divineness) qualify each other. Science is not value free; science is not only related to the truth, but also to goodness, beauty and Divineness values.
Konsep landasan filosofis pengembangan ilmu bersumber pada nilai-nilai ke-UGM-an Heri Santoso; Koento Wibisono Siswomihardjo,; Arqom Kuswanjono
Jurnal Kawistara Vol 6, No 3 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/kawistara.22982

Abstract

This research is motivated by crisis, especially of UGM (Universitas Gadjah Mada) identity andof philosophical foundations of its scientific development. This study aims to inventory, analyzesynthesize, critically evaluate, as well as construct a philosophical foundation of scientific development originating in UGM values. The study employs a reflective, systematic philosophical research model.Data consists mainly of documents data, supported by field data collected through participantobservation and in-depth interviews. Material objects of research are values contained in the university’slegal basis or statute, symbols of its identity attributes, and thoughts of its leaders, while formal objectof research is philosophy, particularly philosophy of values (axiology) and philosophy of science. Datawill be analyzed using elements of methodical study of philosophy, especially interpretive analysis in aheuristic framework to come to conclusion.The results show that: First, history of ideas indicates that GMU scholars have proposed andjustified concept and model of scientific development based on GMU (Gadjah Mada University)values, that is the concept of “Pancasila as (1) guidance (2) orientation and (3) paradigm of scientificand technological development.” Scientific models that were successfully developed are (1) Pancasilaicscience and knowledge and Science of State and Law of Pancasila (Ilmu Negara dan Hukum Pancasila)by Notonagoro; (2) Pancasila Economics (Ilmu Ekonomi Pancasila) by Mubyarto; and (3) PropheticSocial Science (Ilmu Sosial Profetis) by Kuntowijoyo. Second, the concept of scientific developmentdeveloped by GMU-based scholars is actually built on basic assumptions that science is not value-freeand, thereby, teleological, i.e. acting for the sake of human civilization, usefulness, and happiness. These axiological and metaphysical assumptions are heavily influenced by a metaphysical belief that recognizes the existence and power of God. These axiological and metaphysical assumptions epistemologically imply that there is a source of knowledge and truth other than scientific knowledge and truth.