Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.607
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi Jurnal Yuridis Jurnal Medika Hutama JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH
Muhammad Ali Hanafiah Selian
Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search
Journal : JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH

 1 
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Pekerja Lembur Di PT. Cahaya Insan Menurut Undang-undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan Mochamad Azyimardi Rayadhi; Muhammad Ali Hanafiah Selian
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 3, No 5 (2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v3i5.15680

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan mengenai aturan dan hak pekerja saat melakukan kerja lembur. Permasalahan pada skripsi ini adalah perlindungan hak-hak pekerja ketika sedang bekerja lembur (over time). walaupun aturan mengenai hak dan kewajiban pekerja saat lembur sudah diatur dalam Undangundang namun dilapangan masih banyak perusahaan yang mempekerjakan pekerjanya tidak mengikuti aturan dan tata cara yang sudah di atur dalam Undangundang.Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah Normatif-Empiris. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah studi kepustakaan serta wawancara dari pihak perusahaan, perusahaan yang dimaksud dalam penelitian ini yaitu PT. Cahaya Insan. Dalam penelititan ini yang menjadi contoh kasus adalah pelaksanaan kerja lembur yang dilakukan PT. Cahaya Insan terhadap.Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa terdapat beberapa kebijakan perusahaan PT. Cahaya Insan yang tidak sesuai dengan aturan Undang-undang saat melakukan kegiatan kerja lembur sehingga tata cara dalam kegiatan kerja lembur tidak sesuai dengan yang diatur Undang-undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan, yang mengakibatkan pekerja yang melakukan lembur tidak mendapatkan hak kerja lembur yang dimana hak kerja lembur sudah dilindungi oleh negara.
Tinjauan Yuridis Ketentuan Tanggal Efektif Pemberitahuan Akuisisi Saham Kepada Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (Studi Kasus Putusan KPPU Nomor: 05/KPPU-M/2017) Amalia Fitri Kusuma Dewi; Muhammad Ali Hanafiah Selian
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 1, No 3 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v1i3.13028

Abstract

Abstract:The study was conducted to find out how the provisions for the validity of the legal takeover of shares to KPPU and to determine what the consequences of the delay in notification of the takeover of shares to PT. Indonesian Telecommunications Professionals based on applicable regulations. The method used is a qualitative research method with a normative juridical approach by analyzing decisions and related to laws and regulations in the field of Business Competition Law. This study uses a statute approach, a conceptual approach and a case approach. The results showed that the provisions for the validity of a juridical effective date were from the date the notification was received by the Ministry of Law and Human Rights, both in the event of changes in the articles of association and those that were not accompanied by changes in the articles of association. As for notification of takeover of shares to KPPU, it must be done no later than 30 (thirty) days from the legal effective date. As a result of the late announcement of the takeover of shares, PT. Indonesian Telecommunications Professionals are subject to administrative action in the form of fines of Rp. 1,100,000,000.00 (one billion one hundred million rupiah).Keywords: Juridical Effective Date, Late Notification, Share Takeover, Due to Delay
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Investor Akibat Praktik Manipulasi Transaksi Di Pasar Modal Budi Firmana Firdaus; Muhammad Ali Hanafiah Selian; Nisrina Mutiara Dewi
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 3, No 6 (2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v3i6.18070

Abstract

Metode Penelitian ini menggunakan tipe kajian pustaka (Library Research) yang mengkaji berbagai dokumen terkait penelitian. Metode yang digunakan peneliti adalah  metode penulisan  yuridis  normatif  dengan  menggunakan  pendekatan undang-undang (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (Conceptual approach).Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa regulasi terkait dengan perlindungan  hukum  bagi  investor  pada  pasar  modal  di  Indonesia  sudah memiliki kerangka dan kekuatan hukum yang jelas. Hal ini dibuktikan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1995 tentang Pasar modal dalam 3 (tiga) pasal, yaitu pasal 91, pasal 92, dan pasal 93. Dalam rangka melindungi para investor di pasar modal dari tindak kejahatan manipulasi transaksi yang sedang marak, dilakukan melalui 2 (dua) cara yaitu perlindungan hukum preventif dan perlindungan hukum represif. Perlindungan hukum preventif melalui Lembaga Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK), sedangkan perlindungan hukum represif dilakukan dalam bentuk pemeriksaan, penyidikan dan penerapan sanksi-sanksi yang telah ditentukan oleh OJK.   
Tinjauan Yuridis Ketentuan Uang Muka Di Bawah Ketentuan Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Dan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Ardina Yolanda; Muhammad Ali Hanafiah Selian
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 2, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v2i2.16171

Abstract

This thesis aims to determine the application of advances in the provisions of the applicable laws and regulations. Then question, what is the legal consequences of violating the provisions stipulated under the Minister of Finance Regulation Number 43 / PMK.010 / 2012 concerning Advances for Consumer Financing for Motor Vehicles in Financing Companies, and Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 35 / POJK.05 / 2018 Regarding the Operation of Financing Companies. The type of research used in this research is juridical normative by examining library materials or secondary data as the basic material for research by conducting a search of the regulations and literature related to the problem under study. The results of this thesis research show that the Regulation of the Minister of Finance Number 43 / PMK.010 / 2012 concerning Advances for Consumer Financing for Motor Vehicles in Financing Companies and the Regulation of the Financial Services Authority Number 35 / POJK.05 / 2018 concerning Business Operation of Financing Companies do not conflict with prevailing laws and regulations.Keywords: Finance Companies, Minister of Finance Regulation, Financial Services Authority Regulation, Down Payment
Tanggung Jawab PT. Guntur Kharisma Perkasa Terhadap Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja; Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 641K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2018 Raines Indah Mutiara; Muhammad Ali Hanafiah Selian
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 1, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v1i1.12180

Abstract

Abstract:Termination of Employment is the termination of employment due to a certain reason that results in the termination of rights and obligations between workers or laborers and employers. This can happen to business entities that are incorporated or not incorporated. Including happens to entities owned by individuals, belonging to associations, or other legal entities, both private and state owned. This includes social enterprises and other businesses that have management and employ others by paying wages or other forms of compensation. This study aims to find out the form of corporate responsibility after terminating employment, and the suitability of the arguments in the Supreme Court Decision Number 641 K / Pdt.Sus-PHI / 2018. This study uses a type of normative juridical research and library research by conducting an assessment of applicable laws and regulations that support the results of a study. The results showed that the Supreme Court Decision Number 641 K / Pdt.Sus-PHI / 2018 is not much different and gives legal power over the First Level Decision Number 37 / Pdt.Sus-PHI / 2017 / PN Smr. In Decision Number 641 K / Pdt.Sus-PHI / 2018 the Panel of Judges in its consideration was fair enough in providing legal protection for workers who were terminated, in order to fulfill compensation for workers' rights that should have been accepted in accordance with Law Number 13 2003 About Employment.Keywords: Termination of Employment, Workers, Companies, Employment Relations
Pembuktian Tidak Langsung Dalam Kasus Perjanjian Kartel Impor Bawang Putih; Analisis Putusan Ma No.1495 K/Pdt.Sus-Kppu/2017 Imam Santoso; Muhammad Ali Hanafiah Selian
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 1, No 4 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v1i4.13902

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to analyze the application and strength of indirect evidence in the case of the agreement on the importation of garlic cartels conducted by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia in the decision Number 1945 K / Pdt.Sus-KPPU / 2017. The Supreme Court in its decision used indirect evidence. The research method uses a type of normative legal research with a normative juridical approach by reviewing the applicable legislation, doctrine or expert opinion, and the existing literature books. The results of this study explain that the application of the concept of indirect evidence is not appropriate, because indirect evidence is not explicitly mentioned explicitly in Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition.Keywords: Indirect Monopoly Evidence, Supreme Court 
Pembuktian Tidak Langsung Dalam Praktik Kartel Pada Industri Minyak Goreng (Studi Putusan Nomor 24/KPPU-I/2009 Jo. Nomor 03/KPPU/2010/PN.Jkt.Pst Jo. Nomor 582k/Pdt.Sus/2011.) Ulya, Rafa'any Darajatanti; Selian, Muhammad Ali Hanafiah; Rahmatullah, Indra
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 6, No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v6i2.17788

Abstract

This study aims to examine the application of indirect evidence in handling cartel practices in the cooking oil industry, focusing on a case study of Decision No. 24/KPPU-I/2009 Jo. No.03/KPPU/2010/PN.JKT.PST Jo. Number 582K/PDT.SUS/2011. The research method used is the juridical-normative approach, which relies on legal sources such as laws and regulations, legal principles, norms, principles, and expert opinions to analyze the issues studied. In the KPPU decision No. 24/KPPU-I/2009, the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) stated that 21 cooking oil producers were proven to have practiced cartels. However, business actors applied with the Central Jakarta District Court, which then overturned the decision through Decision No. 03/KPPU/2010/PN.JKT.PST. The cancellation was based on the consideration that KPPU only relied on analysis, theories, and definitions considered speculative and not supported by substantial evidence. KPPU then filed an appeal to the Supreme Court, but the Supreme Court rejected the appeal and upheld the settlement of the first-level court through Decision No. 582K/PDT.SUS/2011. This study also highlights that challenges in indirect evidence can be overcome by implementing a leniency program, as has been implemented in various countries. This program incentivizes parties involved in the cartel to disclose information to the competition authority.
Pembuktian Tidak Langsung Dalam Praktik Kartel Pada Industri Minyak Goreng (Studi Putusan Nomor 24/KPPU-I/2009 Jo. Nomor 03/KPPU/2010/PN.Jkt.Pst Jo. Nomor 582k/Pdt.Sus/2011.) Ulya, Rafa'any Darajatanti; Selian, Muhammad Ali Hanafiah; Rahmatullah, Indra
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v6i2.17788

Abstract

This study aims to examine the application of indirect evidence in handling cartel practices in the cooking oil industry, focusing on a case study of Decision No. 24/KPPU-I/2009 Jo. No.03/KPPU/2010/PN.JKT.PST Jo. Number 582K/PDT.SUS/2011. The research method used is the juridical-normative approach, which relies on legal sources such as laws and regulations, legal principles, norms, principles, and expert opinions to analyze the issues studied. In the KPPU decision No. 24/KPPU-I/2009, the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) stated that 21 cooking oil producers were proven to have practiced cartels. However, business actors applied with the Central Jakarta District Court, which then overturned the decision through Decision No. 03/KPPU/2010/PN.JKT.PST. The cancellation was based on the consideration that KPPU only relied on analysis, theories, and definitions considered speculative and not supported by substantial evidence. KPPU then filed an appeal to the Supreme Court, but the Supreme Court rejected the appeal and upheld the settlement of the first-level court through Decision No. 582K/PDT.SUS/2011. This study also highlights that challenges in indirect evidence can be overcome by implementing a leniency program, as has been implemented in various countries. This program incentivizes parties involved in the cartel to disclose information to the competition authority.
Co-Authors Abdurrauf Abdurrauf Amalia Fitri Kusuma Dewi Ardina Yolanda Budi Firmana Firdaus Hanna Wijaya Hanna Wijaya Imam Santoso Indra Rahmatullah, Indra Mochamad Azyimardi Rayadhi Nisrina Mutiara Dewi Raines Indah Mutiara Ulya, Rafa'any Darajatanti Vindy Puri Amaliyani Yana Sylvana Yohanes Firmansyah Yunus, Nur Rohim