Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

SURROGATE MOTHER;TINJAUAN HUKUM PERDATA DAN ISLAM Selian, Muhammad Ali Hanafiah
Jurnal Yuridis Vol 4, No 2 (2017): Jurnal Yuridis
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (137.878 KB) | DOI: 10.35586/.v4i2.255

Abstract

In the national law context, surrogate mother or populary and the term often used is ?womb renting? is defined freely as an agreement between a woman who bind themself with another party (husband or wife) to become pregnant with the result of conception of the husband and wife that planted into her womb. Womb renting is a condition of a woman that contracted or hired to raise a fetus that belong to other woman or other spouse. On the other hand, the surrogate mother in Islam, commonly called al-?Ummu al-musta?jin or al-?Ummu al-badilah or also known as ar-rahmu al-musta?jin. In the implementation womb renting involves two parties, the first party is a woman that rent her womb and the second party that rent the womb who have no offspring. The price of rent according to an agreement between the parties.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Pekerja Lembur Di PT. Cahaya Insan Menurut Undang-undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan Mochamad Azyimardi Rayadhi; Muhammad Ali Hanafiah Selian
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 3, No 5 (2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v3i5.15680

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan mengenai aturan dan hak pekerja saat melakukan kerja lembur. Permasalahan pada skripsi ini adalah perlindungan hak-hak pekerja ketika sedang bekerja lembur (over time). walaupun aturan mengenai hak dan kewajiban pekerja saat lembur sudah diatur dalam Undangundang namun dilapangan masih banyak perusahaan yang mempekerjakan pekerjanya tidak mengikuti aturan dan tata cara yang sudah di atur dalam Undangundang.Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah Normatif-Empiris. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah studi kepustakaan serta wawancara dari pihak perusahaan, perusahaan yang dimaksud dalam penelitian ini yaitu PT. Cahaya Insan. Dalam penelititan ini yang menjadi contoh kasus adalah pelaksanaan kerja lembur yang dilakukan PT. Cahaya Insan terhadap.Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa terdapat beberapa kebijakan perusahaan PT. Cahaya Insan yang tidak sesuai dengan aturan Undang-undang saat melakukan kegiatan kerja lembur sehingga tata cara dalam kegiatan kerja lembur tidak sesuai dengan yang diatur Undang-undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan, yang mengakibatkan pekerja yang melakukan lembur tidak mendapatkan hak kerja lembur yang dimana hak kerja lembur sudah dilindungi oleh negara.
Tinjauan Yuridis Ketentuan Tanggal Efektif Pemberitahuan Akuisisi Saham Kepada Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (Studi Kasus Putusan KPPU Nomor: 05/KPPU-M/2017) Amalia Fitri Kusuma Dewi; Muhammad Ali Hanafiah Selian
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 1, No 3 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v1i3.13028

Abstract

Abstract:The study was conducted to find out how the provisions for the validity of the legal takeover of shares to KPPU and to determine what the consequences of the delay in notification of the takeover of shares to PT. Indonesian Telecommunications Professionals based on applicable regulations. The method used is a qualitative research method with a normative juridical approach by analyzing decisions and related to laws and regulations in the field of Business Competition Law. This study uses a statute approach, a conceptual approach and a case approach. The results showed that the provisions for the validity of a juridical effective date were from the date the notification was received by the Ministry of Law and Human Rights, both in the event of changes in the articles of association and those that were not accompanied by changes in the articles of association. As for notification of takeover of shares to KPPU, it must be done no later than 30 (thirty) days from the legal effective date. As a result of the late announcement of the takeover of shares, PT. Indonesian Telecommunications Professionals are subject to administrative action in the form of fines of Rp. 1,100,000,000.00 (one billion one hundred million rupiah).Keywords: Juridical Effective Date, Late Notification, Share Takeover, Due to Delay
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Investor Akibat Praktik Manipulasi Transaksi Di Pasar Modal Budi Firmana Firdaus; Muhammad Ali Hanafiah Selian; Nisrina Mutiara Dewi
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 3, No 6 (2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v3i6.18070

Abstract

Metode Penelitian ini menggunakan tipe kajian pustaka (Library Research) yang mengkaji berbagai dokumen terkait penelitian. Metode yang digunakan peneliti adalah  metode penulisan  yuridis  normatif  dengan  menggunakan  pendekatan undang-undang (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (Conceptual approach).Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa regulasi terkait dengan perlindungan  hukum  bagi  investor  pada  pasar  modal  di  Indonesia  sudah memiliki kerangka dan kekuatan hukum yang jelas. Hal ini dibuktikan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1995 tentang Pasar modal dalam 3 (tiga) pasal, yaitu pasal 91, pasal 92, dan pasal 93. Dalam rangka melindungi para investor di pasar modal dari tindak kejahatan manipulasi transaksi yang sedang marak, dilakukan melalui 2 (dua) cara yaitu perlindungan hukum preventif dan perlindungan hukum represif. Perlindungan hukum preventif melalui Lembaga Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK), sedangkan perlindungan hukum represif dilakukan dalam bentuk pemeriksaan, penyidikan dan penerapan sanksi-sanksi yang telah ditentukan oleh OJK.   
Tinjauan Yuridis Ketentuan Uang Muka Di Bawah Ketentuan Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Dan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Ardina Yolanda; Muhammad Ali Hanafiah Selian
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 2, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v2i2.16171

Abstract

This thesis aims to determine the application of advances in the provisions of the applicable laws and regulations. Then question, what is the legal consequences of violating the provisions stipulated under the Minister of Finance Regulation Number 43 / PMK.010 / 2012 concerning Advances for Consumer Financing for Motor Vehicles in Financing Companies, and Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 35 / POJK.05 / 2018 Regarding the Operation of Financing Companies. The type of research used in this research is juridical normative by examining library materials or secondary data as the basic material for research by conducting a search of the regulations and literature related to the problem under study. The results of this thesis research show that the Regulation of the Minister of Finance Number 43 / PMK.010 / 2012 concerning Advances for Consumer Financing for Motor Vehicles in Financing Companies and the Regulation of the Financial Services Authority Number 35 / POJK.05 / 2018 concerning Business Operation of Financing Companies do not conflict with prevailing laws and regulations.Keywords: Finance Companies, Minister of Finance Regulation, Financial Services Authority Regulation, Down Payment
Tanggung Jawab PT. Guntur Kharisma Perkasa Terhadap Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja; Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 641K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2018 Raines Indah Mutiara; Muhammad Ali Hanafiah Selian
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 1, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v1i1.12180

Abstract

Abstract:Termination of Employment is the termination of employment due to a certain reason that results in the termination of rights and obligations between workers or laborers and employers. This can happen to business entities that are incorporated or not incorporated. Including happens to entities owned by individuals, belonging to associations, or other legal entities, both private and state owned. This includes social enterprises and other businesses that have management and employ others by paying wages or other forms of compensation. This study aims to find out the form of corporate responsibility after terminating employment, and the suitability of the arguments in the Supreme Court Decision Number 641 K / Pdt.Sus-PHI / 2018. This study uses a type of normative juridical research and library research by conducting an assessment of applicable laws and regulations that support the results of a study. The results showed that the Supreme Court Decision Number 641 K / Pdt.Sus-PHI / 2018 is not much different and gives legal power over the First Level Decision Number 37 / Pdt.Sus-PHI / 2017 / PN Smr. In Decision Number 641 K / Pdt.Sus-PHI / 2018 the Panel of Judges in its consideration was fair enough in providing legal protection for workers who were terminated, in order to fulfill compensation for workers' rights that should have been accepted in accordance with Law Number 13 2003 About Employment.Keywords: Termination of Employment, Workers, Companies, Employment Relations
Pembuktian Tidak Langsung Dalam Kasus Perjanjian Kartel Impor Bawang Putih; Analisis Putusan Ma No.1495 K/Pdt.Sus-Kppu/2017 Imam Santoso; Muhammad Ali Hanafiah Selian
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 1, No 4 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v1i4.13902

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to analyze the application and strength of indirect evidence in the case of the agreement on the importation of garlic cartels conducted by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia in the decision Number 1945 K / Pdt.Sus-KPPU / 2017. The Supreme Court in its decision used indirect evidence. The research method uses a type of normative legal research with a normative juridical approach by reviewing the applicable legislation, doctrine or expert opinion, and the existing literature books. The results of this study explain that the application of the concept of indirect evidence is not appropriate, because indirect evidence is not explicitly mentioned explicitly in Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition.Keywords: Indirect Monopoly Evidence, Supreme Court 
Politik Hukum Mengenai Keterbukaan Data Medis Tenaga Medis Penderita COVID-19 VS Transparansi Informasi Publik Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Universal Yohanes Firmansyah; Muhammad Ali Hanafiah Selian
Jurnal Medika Hutama Vol. 3 No. 02 Januari (2022): Jurnal Medika Hutama
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Medika Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Covid-19 case has become a pandemic and a major problem throughout the world, especially Indonesia due to its very easy and fast spread from person to person. These medical problems directly affect social life, especially legal issues that cause friction between the confidentiality of patient data as a form of private law and the disclosure of public information as a form of modern society's demands for open, actual, and transparent information. This research is a study that reviews normative juridical by means of analysis and synthesis of deductive conclusions from various statements in various secondary data sources which are all relevant and related to the main issues discussed in this journal with the aim of obtaining an overview of legal reviews and comparative studies related to this issue. . A literature search reveals the principle of legal certainty and legal protection for the community, especially in the era of the Covid-19 pandemic. The status of medical records is also a part of private legal aspects that are confidential and may not be disseminated to the general public without the permission of the owner or legislation. However, in the era of the Covid-19 pandemic, accompanied by the public's encouragement of public information disclosure, the principle of public interest must be guaranteed by the rule of law, by demonstrating a strong commitment to the principle of "nothing is above the law". Therefore, good governance is a must to create excellent service to the community. Further implementation of this policy by the Government as the regulator is important in order to facilitate public interests by not injuring individual rights.
TANGGUNG JAWAB HUKUM RUMAH SAKIT TERHADAP HAK PASIEN DI ERA PANDEMI COVID-19 Hanna Wijaya; Muhammad Ali Hanafiah Selian
Jurnal Medika Hutama Vol. 3 No. 02 Januari (2022): Jurnal Medika Hutama
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Medika Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

According to the legislation, the hospital's legal responsibility to uphold the patient's rights cannot be divorced from its obligations to the patient. In actuality, the increasing number of Covid-19 instances in Indonesia has left hospitals unable to handle patients in need of therapy, particularly those with severe and critical diseases requiring intensive care units. With bed occupancy rates (BOR) in almost all hospitals above 85 percent, the community must recognize that hospitals must prioritize care for patients with moderate, severe, or life-threatening diseases. In any event, the Covid-19 epidemic had an effect on the quality of patient care received in hospitals. The study examined hospitals' legal obligation for preserving patient rights during the Covid-19 outbreak using normative juridical research methods and empirical evidence. The study's findings suggest that, despite constraints in providing great health care to patients, hospitals must protect patients' rights to safety and security while in the hospital. As a result, it is vital to construct a legal framework that protects the rights of health care employees and hospitals delivering services to patients during this pandemic, with a special emphasis on labor standards, occupational health and safety standards, and labor social security standards. The government must assist in terms of facilities and infrastructure by increasing the number of emergency hospitals to accommodate the anticipated increase in Covid-19 patients.
VAKSINASI COVID-19 YANG DIADAKAN OLEH PEMERINTAH RI DALAM UPAYA MEMERANGI PENYAKIT COVID-19 Yana Sylvana; Muhammad Ali Hanafiah Selian
Jurnal Medika Hutama Vol. 3 No. 02 Januari (2022): Jurnal Medika Hutama
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Medika Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The globe has been stunned since the end of 2019 by the emergence of the COVID-19 virus, which spreads extremely swiftly. Indonesia revealed two positive instances of COVID-19 in early March, beginning with the nation of origin, the People's Republic of China. The epidemic of COVID-19 poses a threat to the Indonesian state. The government has taken numerous measures to prevent and control the spread of this virus, including regulating activities, maintaining a safe distance, wearing masks, and washing hands, as well as producing vaccinations. The government is undertaking this effort as a sort of state defense in the fight against COVID-19. This research establishes that COVID-19 is a social disaster that affects people from all walks of life and that one option for containing the Covid-19 outbreak is for the public to participate in the vaccination campaign planned by the authorities as a form of state defense.