Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH
Sartono Sartono
Universitas Jayabaya Jakarta
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Persamaan Pemegang Hak Atas Merek Dalam Persaingan Dagang Henny Novianti; Joko Sriwidodo; Sartono Sartono
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 4, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v4i2.25410

Abstract

Regarding the critical nature of trademark reform, Indonesia participated in the World Intellectual Property Organization's approval of the International Trademark Agreement (WIPO). The 1992 Trademark Law was updated in 1997 by Law No. 10 Resolution No. 14 of 1997, which takes into account the provisions of the International Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS-GATT). This clause protects the origin and geographical indicators of products. Additionally, the provision modifies the former in the preceding law. With regards to trademarks in Indonesia Each user has the ability to trademark his or her name. According to Article 3 of Law No. 20 of 2016 on Marks, trademark rights are granted to registered trademark owners, indicating that the brand system in Indonesia is a constitutive (active) system, with registered trademark owners being trademark rights holders. The registered mark's owner, as the mark's holder, either uses the mark himself or grants authorization to others to do so. Additionally, Article 40 of Law No. 20 of 2016 on Marks and Geographical Indications provides that trademark rights may be transferred in accordance with the Act's provisions.
Kepastian Hukum Penerapan Pajak Air Permukaan (PAP) Di Pemerintahan Daerah Sumatera Utara Tuti Sukmawati; Khalimi Khalimi; Sartono Sartono
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 4, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v4i2.26739

Abstract

The Surface Water Tax (PAP) is one source of regional income. There are disputes and uncertainties that occur at PT. Indonesia Asahan Aluminum or PT. INALUM which has a different perception/understanding in determining the basic water price and the difference in determining the basic water price compared to other similar companies, causing legal uncertainty. The research method used is a normative juridical method, namely library law research that emphasizes secondary data research. The research approach used is a case study of the decision no. PUT-105234.06/2015/PP/M.IIA 2018. This research was conducted to examine how clear legal certainty is in the PT. INALUM and the Regional Government of North Sumatra Province. Based on research on legal certainty, the Regulation of the Governor of North Sumatra Number 24 of 2011 is not clear, causing problems with different calculations, so it is recommended to immediately follow up on the study conducted by BPKP regarding the surface water tax rate for electricity generation for its own purposes.
Co-Authors Henny Novianti Joko Sriwidodo Khalimi Khalimi Tuti Sukmawati