Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.077
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Patrika JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Substantive Justice International Journal of Law PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Qiyas : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Peradilan Cepalo Corruptio JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Dikmas: Jurnal Pendidikan Masyarakat dan Pengabdian Qiyas: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Peradilan Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains
Joko Sriwidodo
Magister Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jayabaya, Jakarta, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Environmental Science Immunology & microbiology Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Neuroscience Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 16 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 16 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Persamaan Pemegang Hak Atas Merek Dalam Persaingan Dagang Henny Novianti; Joko Sriwidodo; Sartono Sartono
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 4, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v4i2.25410

Abstract

Regarding the critical nature of trademark reform, Indonesia participated in the World Intellectual Property Organization's approval of the International Trademark Agreement (WIPO). The 1992 Trademark Law was updated in 1997 by Law No. 10 Resolution No. 14 of 1997, which takes into account the provisions of the International Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS-GATT). This clause protects the origin and geographical indicators of products. Additionally, the provision modifies the former in the preceding law. With regards to trademarks in Indonesia Each user has the ability to trademark his or her name. According to Article 3 of Law No. 20 of 2016 on Marks, trademark rights are granted to registered trademark owners, indicating that the brand system in Indonesia is a constitutive (active) system, with registered trademark owners being trademark rights holders. The registered mark's owner, as the mark's holder, either uses the mark himself or grants authorization to others to do so. Additionally, Article 40 of Law No. 20 of 2016 on Marks and Geographical Indications provides that trademark rights may be transferred in accordance with the Act's provisions.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Usaha Mikro Kecil Menengah (UMKM) Sebagai Mitra Usaha Ketika Terjadi Kepailitan Perusahaan Arimba Rivaldo; Joko Sriwidodo; Maryano Maryano
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 4, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v4i1.24811

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and explain how business partners are protected and compensated during a company's bankruptcy. This study employs both a normative juridical and a legislative methodology. The study's findings indicate that attempts to safeguard and settle the law can be made in two ways: (1) by submitting to the bankruptcy institution in order to produce justice; and (2) by referring to Bankruptcy Law No. 37 of 2004. The bankruptcy research findings are a manifestation of the debtor's failure to run the business. Thus, the best course of action is to prioritize legal protection for MSMEs as business partners. The government must pay attention to the business partners of bankrupt companies, as business partners are only a subset of small and medium businesses that exist to fill the needs of these companies, so that when the company goes bankrupt, the small and medium businesses that are also a subset of the company's activities do not have to go bankrupt as well.
Perkembangan Regulasi dan Urgensi E-Litigasi Di Era Pandemi Corona Virus Disease -19 Joko Sriwidodo
Kertha Patrika Vol 43 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KP.2021.v43.i02.p06

Abstract

Pelaksanaan e-Litigasi saat pandemi Covid-19 di Indonesia masih menimbulkan beberapa isu, mulai dari isu disharmonisasi hukum, hingga belum akrabnya masyarakat Indonesia akan penggunaan e-Litigasi. Namun terlepas dari isu tersebut, proses peradilan tetap harus berjalan mengingat penegakan hukum harus terus dilakukan demi tercapainya keadilan. Berdasarkan latar belakang tersebut, maka permasalahan yang akan dibahas pada penelitian ini yaitu bagaimana perkembangan regulasi penyelesaian perkara saat Pandemi Covid-19 dan bagaimana urgensi e-Litigasi saat Pandemi Covid-19. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Upaya penyelesaian perkara saat Pandemi Covid-19 telah dilakukan oleh Pemerintah Indonesia baik dilakukan upaya melalui jalur litigasi maupun melalui jalur non-litigasi. Adapun upaya penyelesaian perkara melalui jalur non-litigasi telah diterapkan oleh Lembaga Kejaksaan dengan terbentuknya Peraturan Kejaksaan RI (PERJA). Sedangkan upaya penegak hukum dalam penyelesaian perkara saat Pandemi Covid-19 melalui jalur litigasi yaitu dengan adanya e-Litigasi. Diperlukannya keberadaan E-Litigasi saat Pandemi Covid-19 seperti saat ini yaitu karena proses e-Litigasi yang memenuhi asas cepat, sederhana dan murah. Meskipun dalam pelaksanaan e-Litigasi terdapat beberapa kelemahan pada unsur hukum yakni substansi hukum dan budaya hukum. Terkait permasalahan substansi hukum, permasalahan tersebut dapat diselesaikan dengan adanya perumusan peraturan yang lebih mapan terkait e-Litigasi ataupun dapat dilakukan dengan merevisi KUHAP. Sedangkan permasalahan budaya hukum, dapat diselesaikan dengan ketersediaan fasilitas dan sumber daya manusia yang memadai, keterbukaan informasi lengkap yang mudah diakses, ketersediaan budget untuk memenuhi keperluan, serta metode pengambilan keputusan.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Illegal Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Oleh Nakhoda/Crew Kapal Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Aditya Rezeki Ramadhan; Joko Sriwidodo; Kristiawanto Kristiawanto
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Vol 15, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Jayabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31479/jphl.v15i1.206

Abstract

Business activities in the oil and gas sector that violate the laws and regulations in the oil and gas sector. Especially carried out by the captain / crew of tankers or other types of ships such as tugboats, cargo, SPOB and others. The research method is juridical-normative. The source of data in this study is secondary data. Data collection was carried out using field research, while the data analysis technique used was normative juridical analysis, making it possible to produce conclusions regarding criminal law enforcement and criminal liability in the oil and gas sector carried out by the captain/ship crew. Based on research that legal sanctions perpetrators of criminal acts in the field of Oil and Gas have not been able to make a major contribution in order to suppress or eliminate or hinder acts of law violations in the field of Oil and Gas, because there are still many legal loopholes from the Regulations and Legislation created by the Government. Therefore, the management of oil and gas must be improved comprehensively and thoroughly in one law and it is not sufficient if it is only partially regulated in the Job Creation Law so there needs to be a comprehensive overhaul of the new law
The Efforts of Attorney Offices to Resolve Criminal Cases Based on the Concept of Restorative Justice Joko Sriwidodo
Susbtantive Justice International Journal of Law Vol 4 No 1 (2021): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33096/substantivejustice.v4i1.121

Abstract

Recently, several cases show the criminal justice system in Indonesia has not guaranteed legal certainty and justice for the people. Thus, it is necessary to have a breakthrough in Indonesia’s criminal justice system by using the restorative justice approach. This approach is carried out by transferring and institutionalizing in accordance with justice. For this reason, it is necessary to have a specific regulation regarding the settlement of cases based on the concept of restorative justice in law enforcement institutions in Indonesia, especially in the attorney offices. The problems in this research are: How is law enforcement in Indonesia based on the concept of restorative justice? And how are the attorney’s efforts to resolve criminal cases based on the concept of restorative justice? This study aims to provide an overview of the restorative justice application. To respond to the senses of justice in society by implementing case resolution based on restorative justice. This normative legal research is conducted by library research through studying and analyzing primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The research results show that the resolve of criminal cases by the Attorney General Office uses the Indonesian Attorney Office Regulation (PERJA) Number 15 of 2020 concerning Cessation of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice.
Changes in Corruption Eradication Commission In Legal Sociology Perspective Joko Sriwidodo
Corruptio Vol 1 No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/corruptio.v1i1.2073

Abstract

The Corruption Eradication Commission is an independent state institution whose job it is to carry out the duties and powers of corruption eradication free from any power. The Corruption Eradication Commission was born during the reign of President Megawati, namely through Law No. 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission. In 2019 there was a revision of the Corruption Eradication Commission Law, but the revision was opposed by the public, because the change was seen as likely to weaken the Corruption Eradication Commission. Observing the brief description above, the researcher in this paper wants to raise at least 2 problems, namely; 1), Are the three foundations for the formation and amendment of the Prevailing Laws, namely juridical, philosophical and sociological elements that have been fulfilled in the amendment of the Corruption Eradication Commission Law? 2), is the amendment to the Corruption Eradication Commission Law in accordance with the expectations and realities in society from the perspective of legal sociology? This paper would like to try to provide an overview of the Corruption Eradication Commision and the Amendment to the Corruption Eradication Commision Law, both in the prevailing legal normative theory and in current practice. This research is a normative legal research which is carried out through library research. The discussion in the research, if viewed from the aspect of fulfilling the foundation for the formation and changes of laws and regulations, then the amendments to the Corruption Eradication Commision have fulfilled these aspects, namely philosophical, sociological and juridical aspects in which the Corruption Eradication Commision itself has existed for 17 years in carry out its duties and authorities as an agency to eradicate corruption. Meanwhile, from the perspective of legal sociology, the public does not want any changes to the Corruption Eradication Commision, in which the Corruption Eradication Commision is still the institution of public trust in eradicating corruption in Indonesia.
UPAYA PERCEPATAN PENYELESAIAN PERKARA DI PENGADILAN MENURUT PERATURAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 4 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG ADMINISTRASI DAN PERSIDANGAN PERKARA PIDANA DI PENGADILAN SECARA ELEKTRONIK Joko Sriwidodo; Dwi Andayani Bs.
PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Vol 7, No 3 (2021): Volume 7, Nomor 3 Juli-September 2021
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1019.556 KB) | DOI: 10.33751/palar.v7i2.4252

Abstract

ABSTRAK Pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dalam manajemen perkara pada lembaga peradilan dapat meningkatkan efektifitas dan efisiensi proses peradilan, sehingga dapat menjawab rasa keadilan masyarakat. Bahwa masalah utama dalam lembaga peradilan kita adalah lambatnya penanganan perkara, sulitnya perkara diakses dan integritas para aparatur penyelenggara peradilan. Dengan mengacu pada tiga masalah tersebut, Ketua Mahkamah Agung RI menjadikannya sebagai prioritas dalam melakukan reformasi birokrasi dilingkungan Mahkamah Agung. Penggunaan teknologi informasi dalam lingkungan Mahkamah Agung sudah dilaksanakan sejak tahun 1996 hingga saat ini, penggunaan tersebut terus mengalami penyempurnaan. Ditambah lagi dengan adanya PERMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 tentang Administrasi Perkara dan Persidangan Secara Elektronik dan terbitnya PERMA Nomor 4 Tahun 2020 tentang Administrasi dan Persidangan Perkara Pidana di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik. Kedua PERMA ini semakin mengukuhkan penggunaan teknologi informasi dalam lingkup lembaga peradilan di Indonesia. Permasalahan yang dikaji dalam penelitian ini adalah: 1) Bagaimana Upaya Penyelesaian Perkara di Pengadilan?. 2) Bagaimana Upaya Percepatan Penyelesaian PErkara di Pengadilan Menurut PERMA Nomor 4 Tahun 2020 tentang Administrasi dan Persidangan Perkara Pidana di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik?. Dalam penelitian ini, peneliti ingin mencoba memberikan gambaran mengenai Penerapan teknologi infromasi dalam proses peradilan di pengadilan. Dengan tujuan untuk menjawab tantangan perkembangan zaman dan untuk mengurangi penumpukan perkara serta mengefektifkan asas peradilan sederhana, cepat dan biaya ringan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum yang bersifat normatif yang dilakukan melalui studi kepustakaan (library research) dengan cara melakukan kajian dan menganalisa terhadap bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Dan dalam Penulisan penelitian ini juga, peneliti melakukan kegiatan pengamatan terhadap praktek yang dilakukan dilapangan.  Kata Kunci (Keywords) :  Peraturan Mahkamah Agung, Administrasi dan Persidangan Secara Elektronik  ABSTRACT Utilization of information technology in case management in judicial institutions can increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the judicial process, so that it can answer the public's sense of justice. That the main problems in our judiciary are the slow handling of cases, the difficulty of accessing cases and the integrity of the judicial administration apparatus. With reference to these three issues, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia made it a priority in carrying out bureaucratic reform within the Supreme Court. The use of information technology within the Supreme Court has been implemented since 1996 until now, the use continues to experience improvements. Coupled with the issuance of PERMA Number 1 of 2019 concerning Electronic Case Administration and Trial and the issuance of PERMA Number 4 of 2020 concerning the Administration and Trial of Criminal Cases in Courts Electronically. These two PERMAs further strengthen the use of information technology within the scope of the judiciary in Indonesia. The problems studied in this study are: 1) What are the Efforts to Settle Cases in Court?. 2) What are the Efforts to Accelerate the Settlement of Cases in Courts According to PERMA Number 4 of 2020 concerning Administration and Trial of Criminal Cases in Courts Electronically?. In this study, researchers want to try to provide an overview of the application of information technology in the judicial process in court. With the aim of responding to the challenges of the times and to reduce the accumulation of cases as well as streamlining the principles of simple, fast and low-cost justice. This research is a normative legal research conducted through library research by conducting studies and analyzing primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. And in the writing of this research, the researchers carried out observation activities on the practices carried out in the field. Keywords (Keywords): Supreme Court Regulations, Administration and Electronic Courts
MAKNA PERJANJIAN SEBAGAI DELIK PIDANA PENIPUAN Joko Sriwidodo
Cepalo Vol 5 No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/cepalo.v5no1.2135

Abstract

Perjanjian merupakan suatu perbuatan hukum dimana seseorang berjanji kepada orang lain atau lebih saling berjanji untuk melaksanakan suatu hal, sebagaimana yang tertuang dalam pasal 1313 KUH Perdata. Perjanjian menurut pengertiannya hanya terletak pada lapangan harta kekayaan atau sesuatu yang dapat dinilai dengan uang. Sedangkan penipuan menurut pasal 378 KUHP adalah “Barang siapa dengan maksud untuk menguntungkan diri sendiri atau orang lain secara melawan hukum dengan memakai nama palsu atau martabat (Hoedaniqheid) palsu, dengan tipu muslihat ataupun rangkaian kebohongan, menggerakkan orang lain untuk mengerahkan barang sesuatu kepadanya atau supaya memberi utang maupun, menghapuskan piutang diancam karena penipuan, dengan pidana penjara paling lama 4 tahun”. Kasus perjanjian merupakan domain hukum perdata, namun pada kenyataannya saat ini banyak dilaporkan secara pidana. Padahal pemidanaan sendiri bukan untuk mengembalikan ganti kerugian, melainkan untuk menghukum. Permasalahan yang dikaji dalam penelitian ini adalah: (1) Bagaimana Makna Perjanjian menurut Hukum Perdata? (2) Bagaimana Makna Perjanjian Sebagai Delik Pidana Penipuan?. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum yang bersifat normatif yang dilakukan melalui studi kepustakaan (library research) dengan cara melakukan kajian dan menganalisa terhadap bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Dalam Penulisan penelitian ini juga melakukan kegiatan pengamatan terhadap praktek hukum yang ada dilapangan.
Implementasi Restorative Justice Pada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Tindak Pidana Pinjaman Online Sesuai Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia Afif Rachmat Hidayat; Joko Sriwidodo; Santrawan Paparang
SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Vol 9, No 5 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/sjsbs.v9i5.27514

Abstract

Criminal responsibility is requested for people who have committed a crime. Criminal liability is defined as the continuation of objective reproaches that exist in criminal acts and subjectively those who meet the requirements to be convicted for their actions. There are many reports related to online loan cases that occur today, many victims report complaints to the OJK, because many people feel cheated by online loans, while it is not certain in the case of online loan creditors who are victims. In this paper the authors use qualitative research methods. The results of this study are to explain how restorative justice and corporate criminal acts are carried out by Fintech as a forum for providing online money lending services.Keywords: Fintech; Online Pinajman; Corporate Criminal Liability AbstrakPertanggungjawaban pidana dimintakan kepada orang yang telah melakukan tindak pidana. Pertanggungjawaban pidana diartikan sebagai diteruskannya celaan yang objektif yang ada pada perbuatan pidanda dan secara subjektif yang ada memenuhi syarat untuk dapat dipidana karena perbuatannya itu. Banyak laporan terkait kasus pinjaman online yang terjadi saat ini banyak korban melaporkan keluhan terhadap OJK, dikarenakan banyak orang yang merasa tertipu dengan pinjaman online, sedangkan belum dapat dipastikan dalam kasus pinjaman online kreditur yang menjadi korban. Dalam penulisan ini penulis menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah menjelaskan bagaimana upaya restorative justice dan tindak pidana korporasi yang dilakukan oleh pihak Fintech sebagai wadah penyedia jasa peminjaman uang secara online.Kata Kunci: Fintech; Pinajman Online; Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi
Penyelesaian Sengketa Atas Tumpang Tindih Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Yang Mengalami Pembebasan Lahan Untuk Kepentingan Umum Hosrizul Hosrizul; Joko Sriwidodo; Mohamad Ismed
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 4, No 3 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v4i3.27548

Abstract

Landowners affected by land acquisition initiatives in the public interest, especially for the government's benefit, frequently have trouble receiving compensation, as government and private sector property purchases are common. On the land, there was an overlapping ownership dispute, which delayed the land acquisition because it had to be resolved in court. This study's objective is to examine and appraise techniques for resolving overlapping land ownership disputes and the legal certainty of property rights for which land acquisition is to be done. The author uses normative and empirical legal methods in this study. Because normative legal research focuses on law or norms, the author uses a normative technique. Rules include legal principles, value rules, and legal restrictions. Legally normative study involves legal theory, the legal system, and vertical and horizontal synchronization. Due to overlapping land ownership generated by the buying and selling of land rights, the legal certainty of land rights for which land acquisition is to be done has not been adequately accomplished. The Camat who served as PPAT in the aforementioned case acquired the same block of land, which was not in the public's best interest.
Co-Authors Aditya Rezeki Ramadhan Afif Rachmat Hidayat Agus Prambowo Sulistiyo Aldani Alam Anriz Nazaruddin Halim Arimba Rivaldo Bambang Yudhatama Fitriargo Basuki Basuki Diah Sulastri Dewi Dwi Andayani Bs. Dwi Andayani Budisetyowati Gatut Hendro Hedwig A. Mau Henny Novianti Hosrizul Hosrizul Kristiawanto Kristiawanto Maryano, . Mohamad Ismed Mudrika Mudrika Palmawati Taher Santrawan Paparang Sartono Sartono Septirita Wilman Sri Mulyani Yuhelson Yuhelson Yurisa Martanti