Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

POLITIK HUKUM DI BIDANG KESEHATAN DALAM HUBUNGANNYA DENGAN PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA PEMERINTAH DI BIDANG KESEHATAN Taty Sugiati; Indra Perwira
JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Vol 18 No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (195.759 KB) | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v18i1.285

Abstract

[Legal Politics In Health Area Linked With The Procurement Of Goods And Government’s Services In The Health Field] One of the state objectives is the realization of public welfare. Health as an element of public welfare. To realize welfare in respect of health, the government organizes development of health facilities at both central and regional levels by way of state goods/services procurement in the field of health. The issue encountered is what the government should do to improve the community health services in relation to the State Goods and Services Procurement in the Health Area. This research is juridical normative. It also employs a descriptive-analytical approach. The state goods and services procurement in the field of health has special characteristics, viz. it is often confronted with an abnormal condition that requires a prompt response in order for health services to be delivered, including medical equipment, medicines and even for the sake of saving human lives. To cope with such a condition, direct appointment becomes the only option to meet the requirements in the health area. Under such a circumstance, it is often the case that the official in charge of health goods and services procurement deviates from the prevailing norms and procedures and, instead, puts emphasis on saving human lives. However, the decision to perform direct appointment in the procurement of health goods / services often ends up in criminal charges, which eventually affects the health services. Keywords: Development in the field of health, procurement of goods.
Problem Pemberian Amnesti oleh Presiden Dalam Perspektif Kepentingan Negara Rizky Malinto Ramadani; Indra Perwira; Bilal Dewansyah
Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi Vol 21, No 3 (2021): Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/jiubj.v21i3.1688

Abstract

Article 14 Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution determines that the President grants amnesty and abolition by taking into account the considerations of the House of Representatives. in the provisions of Article (1) of the Emergency Law no. 11 of 1954 concerning Amnesty and Abolition states that "The President, in the interest of the state, can grant amnesty and abolition to people who have committed a criminal act. The President granted this amnesty and abolition after obtaining written advice from the Supreme Court which conveyed the advice at the request of the Minister of Justice.” The issue related to amnesty is that there is no more detailed clarity regarding the criteria for granting amnesty for the benefit of this country, whether the granting of amnesty is only intended for politically charged cases or can also be given for general criminal acts, especially in history, amnesties have been granted only for political crimes. The identification of the problems in this study are: First, the extent to which the granting of amnesty in Indonesia is in accordance with the criteria of the state's interest. The method used by researchers in this study is normative juridical. The results of this study indicate that the most important criterion of the existence of the state's interest is the stability of the state administration system and the guarantee of rights for citizens. The ideal conditions that need to be regulated in amnesty are: Amnesty restrictions are not granted for extraordinary crimes; not allowed to impeach the President. As for the ideal procedure, apart from referring to the 1945 Constitution and the Regulation of the Minister of State Secretary, the granting of amnesty must also ask for consideration from the Supreme Court, so that the granting of amnesty is not only seen for political interests, but also for the interests of the state.
Realitas Politik Hukum Perundang-undangan Indonesia Pasca Reformasi Indra Perwira
Padjadjaran Law Review Vol. 5 (2017): PADJADJARAN LAW REVIEW VOLUME 5 NOMOR 1 DESEMBER 2017
Publisher : PADJADJARAN LAW RESEARCH AND DEBATE SOCIETY

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstrak Hukum sebagai sebuah kesatuan sistem dapat digunakan sebagai sarana untuk mengarahkan perilaku masyarakat dan birokrasi menuju suatu tatanan masyarakat dan pemerintahan yang dicita-citakan. Salah satu cita-cita kemerdekaan adalah memutus bangsa Indonesia dengan sistem hukum kolonial. Secara bertahap sistem hukum kolonial diperbaharui hingga bangsa ini memiliki sistem hukum nasional sendiri yang sesuai dengan kebutuhan bangsa. Dalam membangun sistem hukum nasional tersebut, penting untuk memiliki kebijakan tentang, arah, bentuk, dan materi hukum atau dikenal dengan istilah politik hukum. Sebelum reformasi politik hukum perundang-undangan tersebut dimuat dalam GBHN. Dengan dihapuskannya GBHN setelah reformasi, politik hukum perundang-undangan tidak memiliki arah yang jelas. Beberapa kecenderungan politik hukum perundang-undangan pasca reformasi adalah pemikiran pembentuk dan penegak hukum bahwa hukum hanya undang-undang,pembentukan undang-undang bersifat reaktif, mudah membentuk lembaga baru, mengedepankan sanksi pidana, dan melalui perundang-undangan politik konstitusi bahwa sektor publik harus menjadi tanggungjawab negara kini banyak dilakukan privatisasi. Tulisan ini diharapkan dapat menggugah para ahli hukum untuk membahas kemana arah politik hukum perundang-undangan saat ini akan dikembangkan. Kata Kunci: Indonesia, Politik Hukum, Perundang-undangan, Realitas, Reformasi. Abstract Law as a legal system is a tool of social and bureaucrats engineering towards desired society and bureaucracy. One of the legal ideals after Indonesian national independence is to replace colonial legal system by Its own legal system that suited with the characters of the nation. In building such a national legal system, it is impoprtant to have an agreed policy on the direction, form, and substances of the legal system developed. It is also known as legal policy. Before 1998 reformation, legal polies regarding legislation are contained in Broad Guidelines on State Policy (GBHN). After the authority of National Assembly to enact GBHN abolished, legal policies regarding legislation have no clear direction. There is several reality on legal policies regarding legislation after the reformation such as the view that the Law is just the Laws (Acts), legislation become reactive rather than responsive, desire to establish new institution, rely on criminal punishment, and privatization of public sector. These trends emphasize that the legal policies regarding legislation has no clear direction. By this paper, i expect to wake legal scholars up, and further discussing some agreed policies regarding the direction of legislation we will develop. Keywords: Indonesia, Legal Policy, Legislation, Reality, Reformation.
ENVIRONMENTAL PERSONHOOD REIMAGINED: A CONCISE PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW Muhammad Pasha Nur Fauzan; Indra Perwira; Imamulhadi
Mimbar Hukum Vol 36 No 1 (2024): Mimbar Hukum
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/mh.v36i1.7553

Abstract

Abstract This paper is built upon one question: can the natural world be recognised as a ‘member’ of a legal community? By exploring the nature of legal personhood, this paper revisits the concept of environmental personhood. This paper uses the naturalistic approach to ground legal philosophical analysis in empirical realities and gain a deeper understanding of the natural world. This paper argues that legal personhood is an institutional fact influenced by moral ideas configured based on how humans organise organize value. The concept of ‘environmental personhood’ is built upon the idea that the natural world possesses inherent rights that must be protected similarly to human rights. This paper finds that, although the ecocentric approach to environmental personhood must be rejected, it can be salvaged. By reformulating environmental personhood based on artificial personhood, this paper opens up opportunities for the concept to be maintained. It aims to ground a theoretical foundation for further constitutional law research, specifically regarding how the constitution should frame the natural world’s ideal position within the state. Abstrak Penelitian ini didasarkan pada satu pertanyaan: dapatkah lingkungan dimasukkan sebagai anggota komunitas hukum? Dengan menelusuri konsep subjek hukum, penelitian ini meninjau kembali konsep lingkungan sebagai subjek hukum. Artikel ini menggunakan pendataan filsafat hukum naturalistik guna mendasarkan analisis filsafat hukum pada realitas empiris dan mampu menangkap pemahaman lebih dalam mengenai realitas alam. Artikel ini menemukan bahwa subjek hukum merupakan fakta institusional yang dibentuk oleh gagasan moral, yang dikonfigurasikan berdasarkan cara manusia mengorganisasikan nilai. Konsep lingkungan sebagai subjek hukum didasarkan pada gagasan bahwa alam memiliki hak inheren yang harus dilindungi. Artikel ini juga menemukan bahwa, meski pendekatan ekosentris dalam konstruksi lingkungan sebagai subjek hukum inkoheren dan mesti ditolak, konsep tersebut mungkin masih dapat diselamatkan. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat menyediakan fondasi teoritis untuk penelitian Hukum Tata Negara lanjutan, utamanya mengenai bagaimana konstitusi harus mengonstruksikan posisi realitas alam dalam negara.