Gilang Rizki Aji Putra
Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Published : 46 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Blockchain dan Cryptocurrency: Tantangan Regulasi dan Kepastian Hukum dalam Arsitektur Keuangan Digital Indonesia Gilang Rizki Aji Putra; Sri Ajeng Murni Cahyani Putri
BULETIN ADALAH Vol. 9 No. 7 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/adalah.v9i7.51878

Abstract

Blockchain and cryptocurrency have disrupted global financial systems through decentralized and transparent transactions. In Indonesia, however, these technologies face regulatory challenges rooted in conventional legal frameworks. This article analyzes Indonesia’s regulatory landscape on blockchain and cryptocurrency, identifies key issues, and proposes reform directions. Using normative legal research with statutory and comparative approaches, the study finds three main problems: unclear dual legal status of cryptocurrency as commodity and financial asset, weak mechanisms for seizure and enforcement of digital assets, and tension between regulation and the borderless nature of blockchain. Despite reforms under the P2SK Law and OJK supervision, significant legal gaps remain. The article concludes that comprehensive digital asset legislation is urgently needed. Keywords: Blockchain, Cryptocurrency, Legal Certainty, Digital Assets, Regulation.
Kedudukan Bukti Digital dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia: Rekonsepsi Pengaturan dan Penguatan Chain of Custody di Era Cyber-Enabled Crime Gilang Rizki Aji Putra
BULETIN ADALAH Vol. 8 No. 7 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/adalah.v8i7.51879

Abstract

Digital transformation has reshaped criminal activity and positioned electronic evidence as a central element in criminal investigations. This article analyzes the juridical status of digital evidence within Indonesia’s criminal justice system, focusing on its legal basis, evidentiary value, and challenges related to authentication and the preservation of chain of custody. Using normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, the study finds that the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law) has expanded the closed system of evidentiary instruments under the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) by formally recognizing electronic information and documents as admissible evidence. Nevertheless, significant issues remain, including unclear substantive requirements for admissibility, the absence of comprehensive chain of custody standards, and disparities in law enforcement capacity. Court decisions demonstrate that evidentiary strength often depends on proving integrity and authenticity rather than clear normative standards. The article concludes that procedural reform, standardized digital forensic protocols, and institutional capacity building are essential. Keywords: Digital Evidence, Chain of Custody, Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law), Digital Forensics.
Peran Forensik Digital dalam Mengungkap Kejahatan Siber: Tantangan Prosedural dan Kebutuhan Standardisasi di Indonesia Gilang Rizki Aji Putra
BULETIN ADALAH Vol. 8 No. 7 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/adalah.v8i7.51880

Abstract

Digital forensics is a multidisciplinary field that integrates information technology and forensic science to identify, secure, extract, and analyze digital evidence for judicial proceedings. This article examines the vital role of digital forensics in uncovering cybercrime in Indonesia, analyzing its legal foundations and identifying procedural and institutional challenges affecting its effectiveness. Using normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches, the study finds that digital forensics serves as a crucial mechanism for transforming volatile digital traces into admissible evidence that satisfies chain of custody requirements. The Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law) and relevant Supreme Court jurisprudence provide a legal basis for the acceptance of digital evidence. However, implementation faces significant obstacles, including fragmented procedural standards, limited expert personnel, regional disparities in laboratory infrastructure, and the absence of uniform national guidelines. The article concludes that strengthening standardization, certification, and institutional capacity is essential. Keywords: Digital Forensics, Cybercrime, Chain of Custody, Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law), Digital Evidence.
Tantangan Aparat Penegak Hukum dalam Menangani Cybercrime di Indonesia: Kesenjangan Kapasitas, Regulasi, dan Kerjasama Lintas Batas Gilang Rizki Aji Putra
BULETIN ADALAH Vol. 8 No. 7 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/adalah.v8i7.51881

Abstract

Cybercrime has evolved into a sophisticated, transnational, and rapidly mutating form of criminality driven by technological advancement. Law enforcement agencies, as the frontline actors in combating these offenses, face complex multidimensional challenges. This article aims to comprehensively identify and analyze the challenges encountered by Indonesian law enforcement authorities—particularly the Police, the Prosecutor’s Office, and related institutions—in addressing cybercrime. Employing a normative-sociological legal research method with statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches, the study reveals three principal clusters of challenges: (1) technical and human resource capacity gaps that lag behind technological developments; (2) procedural regulatory frameworks that remain insufficiently adaptive to modern cyber investigations; and (3) jurisdictional barriers and limited international cooperation in pursuing transnational offenders. Analysis of major cases, including ransomware attacks, cross-border online fraud syndicates, and dark web investigations, demonstrates persistent institutional constraints. The article concludes that comprehensive institutional reform, technological investment, and enhanced international collaboration are imperative. Keywords: Law Enforcement Agencies, Cybercrime, Technical Capacity, Jurisdiction, International
Kerja Sama Internasional dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan Siber: Urgensi Ratifikasi Konvensi Budapest dan Pembentukan Rezim Kolaboratif bagi Indonesia Gilang Rizki Aji Putra
BULETIN ADALAH Vol. 8 No. 7 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/adalah.v8i7.51882

Abstract

Cybercrime transcends territorial boundaries, constituting a transnational threat that demands coordinated international responses. This article analyzes the framework of international cooperation in combating cybercrime, evaluates Indonesia’s position within the global architecture, and formulates strategic measures to strengthen its engagement. Using normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, the study finds that the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime (2001) remains the most comprehensive multilateral instrument, providing a foundation for harmonizing substantive and procedural law as well as enabling rapid cooperation mechanisms. As Indonesia currently holds observer status, structural limitations persist, including delays in Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) processes and lack of direct access to the 24/7 point-of-contact network. Analysis of cross-border cyber incidents affecting Indonesia demonstrates that without seamless cooperation, enforcement efforts frequently stall at issues of attribution and jurisdiction. The article concludes that accession to the Budapest Convention, coupled with domestic legal harmonization and proactive cyber diplomacy, is essential. Keywords: Transnational Cybercrime, Budapest Convention, Mutual Legal Assistance, International Cooperation, Jurisdiction.
Tanggung Jawab Hukum Platform Media Sosial terhadap Konten Pengguna di Indonesia: Potret Conditional Safe Harbor, Sistem SAMAN, dan Tarikan Menuju Akuntabilitas Proaktif Gilang Rizki Aji Putra
BULETIN ADALAH Vol. 8 No. 7 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/adalah.v8i7.51883

Abstract

Social media platforms have evolved from mere communication channels into digital public spheres mediating information, opinion, and expression for billions of users. The presence of illegal content—such as hate speech, pornography, disinformation, and incitement to violence—raises a fundamental question: to what extent are platforms legally responsible for user-generated content? This article analyzes Indonesia’s legal framework on platform liability, examining the intermediary liability regime, its evolution from safe harbor to conditional liability, and the implementation of the Content Moderation Compliance System (SAMAN). Using normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, the study finds that Indonesia adopts a conditional liability model requiring platforms to remove illegal content within specified deadlines upon notification, subject to administrative fines. However, regulatory fragmentation and limited due process safeguards undermine legal certainty. Comparative analysis indicates the need for stronger transparency standards and independent oversight mechanisms. Keywords: Intermediary Liability, Social Media Platforms, SAMAN, Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law), Conditional Safe Harbor, Content Moderation.