Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

KOTAK KOSONG MEMENANGKAN PEMILIHAN UMUM KEPALA DAERAH Ayu Lestari
Lex LATA Volume 1 Nomor 2, Juli 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/lexl.v1i2.468

Abstract

Abstrak: Indonesia adalah salah satu negara yang menganut sistem demokrasi dalam menjalankan pemerintahan. Salah satu manifrstation demokrasi adalah Pemilihan Umum (GE). Pada akhirnya, kekuasaan rakyat tampaknya masih memiliki peran besar dalam Pemilihan Umum. Ini bisa dilihat dari pemilihan kepala daerah yang berlangsung di Kota Makassar. Orang-orang Makassar lebih suka kotak kosong daripada satu-satunya kandidat yang didukung oleh partai politik. Penelitian ini membahas tinjauan yuridis tentang kemenangan kotak kosong dalam Pemilihan Umum Kepala Daerah. Ini adalah penelitian normatif dengan jenis dan sumber bahan hukum yang diambil dari data sekunder. Bahan hukum dikumpulkan melalui tinjauan pustaka dan dianalisis secara kualitatif dengan kesimpulan deduktif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa faktor calon tunggal dalam pemilihan kepala daerah dibagi menjadi faktor yuridis dan non-yuridis. Faktor yuridis dimulai dengan keputusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 100 / PUU-XIII / 2015. Faktor non-yuridis adalah sebagai berikut: proses pencalonan membutuhkan biaya tinggi dan keberadaan politik uang; lemahnya daya saing kandidat dalam persaingan politik; kepentingan politik elit politik; dan kegagalan partai politik untuk memberikan pendidikan politik kepada kader. Konsekuensi hukum dari memenangkan kotak kosong terhadap kandidat tunggal adalah bahwa jika kandidat tunggal kehilangan perolehan suara sah kurang dari 50%, maka pemilihan berikutnya akan diadakan lagi di tahun berikutnya
The Correlations among Reading Habit, Multiple Intelligences, and Writing Mastery of English Education Study Program Students of Sriwijaya University Ayu Lestari; Sofendi Sofendi; Ismail Petrus
IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics) Vol 2, No 2 (2018): Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (360.045 KB) | DOI: 10.21093/ijeltal.v2i2.99

Abstract

The objectives of this study were (1) to describe the students’ Reading habit, multiple intelligences, and writing mastery, (2) to find out whether or not there was significant correlation among the students’ Reading habit, multiple intelligences, and writing mastery, and (3) to find out whether or not the students’ Reading habit and multiple intelligences contributed to their writing mastery. In this study, 76 undergraduate EFL students of English Education Study Program of Sriwijaya University in the academic year 2017/2018 were chosen as a samples by means of purposive sampling. This study applied correlational research design. The data were collected by using questionnaires and test, and were analyzed by using Pearson Product Moment correlation coefficient and regression analysis. The results showed that (1) most of the students (50%)  were in the average level of reading habit; most of the students (15.7%) had six dominant intelligences; most of the students (57.8%) were in the good level of writing mastery; (2) reading attitude was the only habit which had a negative and significant correlation to the students’ writing mastery (r= -271, p< 0.018); reading attitude also had positive and negative and significant correlation to the students’ ideas  (r= 0.367, p< 0.001) and thesis voice audience (r= -0.236, p=< 0.040); logical intelligence was the only intelligence which had negative and significant correlation to the students’ writing mastery (r= -0.238, p= 0.038); ideas was the only the aspect of writing had a positive  and significant correlation to the students’ logical intelligence (r= 0.267, p= 0.020) and intrapersonal intelligence (r= 0.250, p= 0.029); (3) reading attitude became the best predictor and influenced the students’ writing mastery with 7.3% contribution (R2 = 0.073).