Nur Azisa
Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

The Role of the Crown Witness in the Process of Proving Criminal Cases in Indonesia Ismail Ghonu; Andi Muhammad Sofyan; Nur Azisa
Musamus Law Review Vol 1 No 1 (2018): MuLaRev
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Musamus University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35724/mularev.v1i1.737

Abstract

The research issue focuses on the examination of crown witnesses in the process of establishing criminal cases in Indonesia. The examination of the crown witnesses is necessary because law enforcement officers find it difficult to find evidence, other than the testimony of witnesses of the perpetrators themselves in order to find material truth that can be justified. The result of the research shows that the role of the crown witness in the criminal prosecution process is very significant, that is to find the material truth, so that the fast and simple proof process fulfills the minimum standard of proof, upholds public justice against the perpetrators and determines the demands of each actor in accordance with its role. The need for legal protection against the crown witness and the need for a policy of reform of criminal procedure law through the refinement of the Criminal Procedure Code relating to the content of witness material of the crown firmly and limitatively in the future.
The Role of the Crown Witness in the Process of Proving Criminal Cases in Indonesia Ismail Ghonu; Andi Muhammad Sofyan; Nur Azisa
Musamus Law Review Vol 1 No 1 (2018): MuLaRev
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Musamus University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35724/mularev.v1i1.737

Abstract

The research issue focuses on the examination of crown witnesses in the process of establishing criminal cases in Indonesia. The examination of the crown witnesses is necessary because law enforcement officers find it difficult to find evidence, other than the testimony of witnesses of the perpetrators themselves in order to find material truth that can be justified. The result of the research shows that the role of the crown witness in the criminal prosecution process is very significant, that is to find the material truth, so that the fast and simple proof process fulfills the minimum standard of proof, upholds public justice against the perpetrators and determines the demands of each actor in accordance with its role. The need for legal protection against the crown witness and the need for a policy of reform of criminal procedure law through the refinement of the Criminal Procedure Code relating to the content of witness material of the crown firmly and limitatively in the future.
THE CRIME OF FORCED MARRIAGE AGAINST CHILDREN IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF CRIMINAL LAW Nur Azisa; Syamsuddin Muchtar; M. Aris Munandar; Ismail Iskandar; Nurul Hikmah; Fhildzha Zhafirin
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v5i2.799

Abstract

Child marriage is a phenomenon that stilloccurs frequently in Indonesia today. After the promulgation of The Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 12 Year2022 concerning Crimes of Sexual Violence(TPKS Law), child marriage is categorizedas a criminal act of sexual violence basedon forced child marriage. The criminalprovisions related to forced child marriages, the TPKS Law is disharmony with The Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 16 Year 2019 concerning Amendments to The Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 Year 1974 concerning Marriage (MarriageLaw), in which the law accommodates thepossibility of filing a dispensation with ageand cultural considerations. Meanwhile, thisis very inconsistent with the principlesadhered to in the TPKS Law. So that thiscan lead to obscuur libel (obscurity) in lawenforcement in the future. Given that theTPKS Law still does not have to implementregulations, it is still classified as an aspiredlaw (ius constituendum).