Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law (IJIL)
M. Nurul Irfan
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Unsur Jarîmah Qadhaf dalam Penetapan Status Hukum Anak Luar Kawin M. Nurul Irfan
AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Vol 13, No 2 (2013)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ajis.v13i2.935

Abstract

Abstract: The Jarîmah Qadhaf in Determining the Legal Status of Illegitimate Children. The decision of South Jakarta Religious Court which compared a child born within an unregistered marriage with a child born outside marriage are equal is a real form of rejection of the plaintiff’s claim in a lawsuit of the legal status of illegitimate children. From an Islamic criminal law perspective, determining the legal status of illegitimate children contains an element of jarîmah qadhaf or the criminal act of adultery which is prohibited in Q.s. al-Nûr [24]: 4. The legal process in this case still proceeding after the plaintiff expressed an intention to continue to the appeals process at the Jakarta PTA level and if necessary up to the level of the Supreme Court of Cassation. In the process of seeking justice, this will certainly bring benefits to the discourse and dynamics of Islamic family law in the future.Keywords: jarîmah, qadhaf, claim, illegitimate children, children of adulteryAbstrak: Unsur Jarîmah Qadhaf dalam Penetapan Status Hukum Anak Luar Kawin. Putusan Pengadilan Agama Jakarta Selatan yang menganggap sama antara anak yang lahir akibat perkawinan tidak tercatat dengan anak lahir di luar perkawinan merupakan sebuah bentuk nyata penolakan gugatan pihak penggugat dalam perkara gugatan status hukum anak luar kawin. Dalam perspektif hukum Pidana Islam, penetapan status hukum anak luar kawin ini mengandung unsur jarîmah qadhaf atau tindak pidana menuduh zina yang dilarang dalam Q.s. al-Nûr [24] ayat 4. Proses hukum dalam perkara ini masih terus bergulir setelah pihak penggugat menyatakan pikir-pikir untuk kemudian diteruskan pada proses banding ke tingkat PTA DKI Jakarta dan jika perlu hingga pada tingkat Kasasi Mahkamah Agung RI. Dalam proses pencarian keadilan ini dipastikan akan membawa manfaat bagi wacana dan dinamisasi hukum keluarga Islam di di masa-masa yang akan datang.Kata Kunci: jarîmah, qadhaf, gugatan, anak luar kawin, anak zinaDOI: 10.15408/ajis.v13i2.935
Normative Divergence on Consensual Homosexuality: A Comparative Study of Islamic Criminal Law and Indonesian Positive Law M. Nurul Irfan; Rahmadani, Laila Palupi; Rosyid, Maskur; Dahri, Harapandi; Urteaga-Crovetto, Shalini
Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law
Publisher : Postgraduate Programme of UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/jrbvhk28

Abstract

The criminalisation of liwāṭ in Islamic criminal law is grounded in a robust normative framework. However, it contains a dialectic between the determination of ḥudūd and the discretion of taʿzīr, with the principle that darʾ al-ḥudūd bi al-shubuhāt prevents criminalisation when there is doubt. In contrast, Indonesian positive law explicitly does not criminalise consensual same-sex relations between adults because the principle of legality requires the formulation of a written, clear, and definite criminal offence. This absence of norms is not a legislative omission but rather a policy choice that creates legal ambiguity as a control mechanism, achieved indirectly through other legal regimes. This study employs a normative and comparative juridical approach, focusing on the textual interpretation of Islamic criminal law and national statutory provisions. The results show that the tension between the certainty of criminalisation in Islamic criminal law and the ambiguity of Indonesian positive law illustrates two different models of social control: cautious normative certainty versus managed normative absence. The primary contribution of this research is to offer a new conceptual framework by repositioning the "legal vacuum" not simply as the absence of criminal norms at the national level, but as a government strategy based on legal ambiguity in responding to the prescriptivity of Sharia norms. Based on this analysis, the precautionary principle of sentencing in Islamic criminal law has the potential to serve as a basis for harmonisation that aligns with the principles of legality and human rights protection in the national legal system, thereby opening up space for reconciliation between Islamic moral norms and the constitutionality of law in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Dahri, Harapandi Rahmadani, Laila Palupi Rosyid, Maskur Urteaga-Crovetto, Shalini