Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JUSTITIA JURNAL HUKUM Kajian Hukum
Zulfikar Ardiwardana Wanda
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Logical Fallacy Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Legitimasi Status Quo Melalui Presidential Threshold Pemilu Serentak 2019 Zulfikar Ardiwardana Wanda
Justitia Jurnal Hukum Vol 2, No 2 (2018): Justitia Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (501.69 KB) | DOI: 10.30651/justitia.v2i2.2244

Abstract

Indonesia adalah negara demokrasi yang salah satu penerapannya diwujudkan dalam penyelenggaraan pemilu. Menjelang pemilu pada tahun 2019, wetgever mengesahkan Undang-Undang Pemilu Serentak yang diperintahkan oleh Putusan MK Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013. Namun UU a quo menimbulkan ruang perdebatan dengan hadirnya Presidential Threshold yang menciderai keadilan bagi partai politik yang telah ditetapkan sebagai kontestan pemilu. Berdasarkan isu hukum tersebut, penulis melakukan penelitian dengan mengunakan metode penelitian yuridis konstitusional maksud untuk menganalisis interpretasi secara normatif, logika hukum, konseptual/teoretis dan kondisi politik faktual atas keberlakuan Presidential Threshold. Hasil penelitian studi kasus di atas dapat diambil kesimpulan dan rekomendasi bahwa pemberlakuan Presidential Threshold adalah inkonstitusional dan  tidak memungkinkan menyatukan pemilu eksekutif  dan legislatif secara serentak sehingga perlu dihapuskan dan dinyatakan tidak memiliki kekuatan hukum mengikat oleh lembaga yang berwenang. Kata Kunci:  Pemilihan Umum Serentak, Presidential Threshold, Opened Legal Policy
MEMPERKUAT DESAIN KEWENANGAN PENGAWASAN KOMISI YUDISIAL MELALUI POLITIK HUKUM KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN Zulfikar Ardiwardana Wanda
Kajian Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2018): Mei
Publisher : Universitas Janabadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (649.928 KB)

Abstract

The authority of the Judicial Commission as an external supervisory body designed in the 1945 Constitution does not provide a constitutional basis that is ideal enough to play a role in the performance and behavior of judges. This was strengthened after the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 005 / PUU-VI / 2006 which states that it is unconstitutional and does not have the legal force to bind norms concerning supervision of constitutional judges because they are considered to cause legal uncertainty (rechtsonzekerheid). Based on these problems, this paper is intended to examine aspects of the authority that the KY has in a functional-constitutional manner. the authority of the Judicial Commission needs to be constitutionally strengthened through constitutional amendments so as not to be easily swayed by other legal products under it. In addition to the continued constitution amendment, it is necessary to provide executive authority to the KY through improving the law so that in exercising its authority effectively. This is intended so that the Judicial Commission can exercise its authority independently as long as it is based on constitutional law and has strong and binding legal force.Keywords : supervision of judges, constitutional amendments, judicial power
Co-Authors