Suparto Suparto
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

KOMPARASI KREDIBILITAS PENYELENGGARAAN UNBK DAN UNKP PADA PELAJARAN MATEMATIKA Kusaeri Kusaeri; A. Saepul Hamdani; Suparto Suparto; Elmita Irmanila
Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Vol 24, No 1 (2018): June
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (362.113 KB) | DOI: 10.17977/um048v24i1p10-18

Abstract

Abstract: Administration Credibility of the Computer-based and the Paper-and-pencil National Examination in Mathematics Subject. This survey compares the administration credibility between computer-based and paper-and-pencil national examination of one subject, that is, mathematics. The credibility was measured from the perspectives of RAVEN – reputation, ability to observe, vested in­terest, expertise, and neutrality. Three schools in Pasuruan regency were selected to represent the com­puter-based, and another three to represent the paper-and-pencil test. The data were collected after the 2017 national examination using questionnaires and interview guide. The questionnaires were dis­tributed to the students and mathematics teachers, whereas the interviews were carried out with the headmasters. The results of data analysis reveal that the computer-based final exam have better credibil­ity in the areas of ability to observe and expertise, while the paper-and-pencil one in reputation and neu­trality. In terms of vested interest, the two types of test do not differ.Abstrak: Komparasi Kredibilitas Penyelenggaraan UNBK dan UNKP pada Pelajaran Matema­tika. Penelitian ini bertujuan membandingkan kredibilitas penyelenggaraan UNBK dan UNKP yang berfokus pada mata pelajaran matematika. Kredibilitas UN dalam penelitian ini dilihat dari aspek repu­tation, ability to observe, vested interest, expertise, dan neutrality atau RAVEN. Penelitian ini termasuk dalam kategori penelitian survei, dilakukan di Kabupaten Pasuruan pada Bulan April - Mei 2017 (setelah diselenggarakannya UN 2017). Sampel penelitian yakni 3 sekolah penyelenggara UNBK dan 3 sekolah penyelenggara UNKP dengan menggunakan teknik pengumpulan data berupa kuesioner dan wawancara. Kuesioner diberikan kepada siswa dan guru matematika sedangkan wawancara dilakukan pada kepala sekolah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa UNBK unggul pada aspek ability to observe dan expertise, sedangkan UNKP unggul pada aspek reputation dan neutrality. Pada aspek vested inter­est, perbandingan antara UNBK dan UNKP adalah sama.
PEMBELAJARAN LABORATORIUM SOSIAL PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM BERBASIS MODERASI BERAGAMA Eka Putra Romadona; Amar Ma'ruf; Imam Syafi'i; Suparto Suparto
AT-TA'DIB: JURNAL ILMIAH PRODI PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM Vol. 14, No.2 (Desember 2022)
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Agama Islam Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri (STAIN) Teungku Dirundeng Meulaboh Aceh Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47498/tadib.v14i2.1221

Abstract

Islamic education is the accumulation of knowledge originating from the Al-Qur'an and As-Sunnah, taught, fostered, and instructed to mankind as students through the application of methods and methods designed to develop students with Muslim personalities. In Islamic education, an increase in student moderation coincides with an increase in character. So it is felt that there is a need for a form of design to be able to help facilitate Islamic religious education to achieve the desired goals. The literature study was used in this research to obtain data about Islamic religious moderation-based social laboratory learning. The data obtained is then analyzed by following a flow that includes data simplification, data visualization, and drawing conclusions. This research seeks to develop a Religious Moderation-based PAI Social Laboratory Learning design. This study tries to describe the design of PAI learning based on the value of religious moderation. The results of this study are a design of PAI learning which is designed through several stages, including analysis to evaluation, and revision. This research itself has contributed to the discussion of Islamic religious education in Indonesia which focuses on the themes of religious moderation.
Assessing the Assessor: Investigating Formative Assessment Literacy Among Islamic Education Teachers in Lamongan, Indonesia Zuhriyyah Hidayati; Nurdi Nurdi; Kusaeri Kusaeri; Suparto Suparto; Sita Isna Malyuna
AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan Vol 17, No 4 (2025): DECEMBER 2025
Publisher : STAI Hubbulwathan Duri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35445/alishlah.v17i4.7933

Abstract

Formative assessment literacy is essential for effective and student-centered instruction, yet limited research explores its application within religious education. This study investigates the level of formative assessment literacy among Islamic Education (PAI) teachers in Lamongan, East Java, focusing on three dimensions: conceptual understanding, practical implementation, and socio-emotional awareness. A descriptive quantitative design was employed, involving 263 PAI teachers from elementary to secondary levels. Data were collected using a validated Likert-scale questionnaire adapted from the Teacher Formative Assessment Literacy Scale (TFALS). Descriptive statistics and linear regression analysis were used to examine literacy levels and the predictive contribution of each dimension. The results show that PAI teachers exhibit high levels of formative assessment literacy across all three dimensions, with mean scores exceeding 5 on a 6-point scale. Regression analysis confirmed that each dimension significantly and independently contributes to teachers’ perceptions of formative assessment. However, interaction effects between dimensions were not significant, indicating limited cross-dimensional integration. These findings suggest that while PAI teachers possess strong individual competencies in assessment, holistic integration remains a challenge. Professional development should therefore address not only technical knowledge but also foster reflective and emotional capacities. Strengthening these areas can support more inclusive, ethical, and responsive assessment practices, particularly in value-based educational contexts such as Islamic education.