Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

UNION BUSTING SEBAGAI UPAYA MEMAHAMI DINAMIKA PENEGAKAN HUKUMPIDANAPERBURUHAN: SUATU TINJAUANSTUDI SOCIO - LEGAL Chessa Ario Jani Purnomo
Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 1, No 2 (2018): Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Universitas Pamulang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (228.953 KB) | DOI: 10.32493/rjih.v1i2.2223

Abstract

Abstrak Upaya memahami penegakan hukum perburuhan hanya menurut pasal-pasal di dalam peraturan perundang-undangan adalah sebuah kesalahan besar sekaligus kesombongan kita atas realitas hukum yang begitu luas untuk dipahami. Union Busting atau tindakan antiberserikat yang dilakukan oleh siapapun adalah kejahatan menurut hukum. Namun hal ini tidak otomatis ditegakkan oleh aparat penegak hukum. Alih-alih sebagai jaminan dan perlindungan bagi kaum buruh guna memperjuangkan hak normatif melalui hak berserikat, malah sebagai fi g h t b a c k kaum pengusaha dan bahkan negara untuk mempidanakan paksa (kriminalisasi) kaum buruh. Kata kunci: Hak buruh untuk berserikat, hak asasi manusia, union busting, penegakan hukumpidana perburuhan
Problematika Fungsi Hakim Pengawas dan Pengamat Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia: Tinjauan Studi Socio-Legal H Muhamad Rezky Pahlawan MP; Chessa Ario Jani Purnomo
Sang Pencerah: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton Vol 6 No 2 (2020): Sang Pencerah: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (321.764 KB) | DOI: 10.35326/pencerah.v6i2.709

Abstract

In this study, the author considers 3 (three) reasons that are considered important such as philosophical aspects, aspects of criminal law theory, and political aspects of national criminal procedural law after describing 5 (five) previous legal scientific studies related to the implementation of supervisory judges and observers in the criminal justice system. This study aims to reflect on the legal principles of the kimwasmat institution and build models and patterns of implementing the kimwasmat institution. This research intends to answer 2 (two) legal issues: firstly, what are the legal principles contained in Article 280 of the KUHAP. Secondly, what is the model and pattern of implementation of the supervisory and observer judge institutions based on Article 280 of the KUHAP. This legal research uses the socio-legal research method, the materials of which are the results of interviews of judges in deliberate district courts, study of court official documents, relevant laws and regulations to legal issues, legal theory and social science theories. This study found, firstly, the function of kimsmat based on the principle of legal certainty and the principle of benefit which seeks to be married into the principle of certainty which is useful based on Pancasila. Finally, the classical bureaucratic model and the institutional model as well as the aspects of state administration to explain the management and control functions of the authority of the kimwasmat become the basis for the court to carry out criminal objectives.