Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Konstruksi Nalar Rechtvinding Hakim dalam Pemberian Izin Poligami yang Berkeadilan Gender dalam Putusan Pengadilan Agama Jombang No. 0899/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Jbg Abdullah Taufik; Ilham Tohari
AL-HUKAMA Vol. 9 No. 2 (2019): December 2019
Publisher : State Islamic University (UIN) of Sunan Ampel

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (623.727 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/alhukama.2019.9.2.496-517

Abstract

The practice of polygamy in Indonesia until now has drawn criticism from some feminists who did not agree. But on the one hand, both Islamic law and positive law permit various conditions. In this case, the Religious Court (PA) becomes the last fence which becomes the determining point for a man to be able to polygamy. For this reason, researchers conducted a study of PA decisions on polygamy, namely Jombang PA Decision No. No. 0899 / Pdt.G / 2018 / PA.Jbg . The focus of the problem is (1) the value of gender justice in the decision and (2) reasoning rechtvinding(legal discovery) judge. The method used in this study is a normative-qualitative legal research method with content analysis techniques from Charles Purse. The results showed that the practice of polygamy licensing in the Religious Courts had actually gone through processes that reflected gender justice. This is reflected in the obligation of the Religious Court to summon the longest wife of the applicant for polygamy to be asked for willingness and information. The results of subsequent studies show that PA Jombang judges used hermeneutic techniques in making legal discovery efforts. Because, they not only focus on aspects of legality, but also consider the contextualization.
Analisis Yuridis Putusan Pengadilan Agama Kediri Nomor 0457/Pdt.G /2016/PA. Kdr Tentang Perkara Ekonomi Syari’ah Evi Nurvita Sari; Imam Annas Mushlihin; Abdullah Taufik
Journal of Sharia Economics Vol 2 No 1 (2020): Journal of Sharia Economics
Publisher : Program Studi Ekonomi Syariah, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, Institut Agama Islam Al Hikmah Tuban

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35896/jse.v2i1.90

Abstract

Completion of the Syari'ah Economic case is the authority of the Religious Court as stated in Article 49 of Act Number 3 of 2006 concerning Judicial Power. This syari'ah economic case Number 0457 / Pdt.G / 2016 / PA.Kdr was submitted by a Syari'ah Bank customer who felt losing because collateral was auctioned by the Syari'ah Bank through the State Wealth and Auction Service Office (KPKNL). If the auction process is carried out, the customer as the Plaintiff will suffer a large loss. On this basis the plaintiff through his legal counsel filed a lawsuit to the Kediri Religious Court. This study used a qualitative approach with normative juridical analysis of the legal documents of the decision of the Kediri Religious Court. This thesis discusses how the basis of legal considerations, the claim of the plaintiffs was declared not accepted (niet ovankelijke verklaard) and the legal implications of the Decision of the Kediri Religious Court Number 0457 / Pdt.G / 2016 / PA.Kdr. The conclusion of the above writing is as follows: First, the basic legal considerations of the decision of the Kediri Religious Court Number 0457 / Pdt.G / 2016 / PA.Kdr are the Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1149 / K / Sip / 1975 dated 17 April 1975 jo. Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 565 / K / Sip / 1973 dated August 21, 1973, jo. verdict of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1149 / K / Sip / 1979 dated April 7, 1979 which states that the object of the claim is unclear, the claim cannot be accepted (niet ovankelijke verklaard). Second, the legal implications of the verdict are final and binding, judicially the ruling causes harm to the plaintiff, besides the principal case is not decided, the plaintiff is also burdened with court fees. Keywords: Juridical Analysis, Decision of the Religious Court, Syari'ah Economy.
Pendistribusian Dana ZIS Melalui Program Genius Perspektif UU No. 23 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pengelolaan Zakat (Studi Kasus Yatim Mandiri Kediri) Distribution of ZIS Funds Through the Genius Perspective Program Law No. 23 of 2011 concerning Management of Zakat Dea Putri Anggraini; Abdullah Taufik; Faridatul Fitriyah
Qawanin: Jurnal of Economic Syaria Law Vol 3 No 2 (2019): Juli
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah IAIN Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (986.189 KB) | DOI: 10.30762/q.v3i2.1607

Abstract

Dana-dana ZIS yang terkumpul dapat menjadi solusi terbaik sebagai penggerak perekonomian dan kesejahteraan masyarakat. Langkah strategis dapat diambil untuk pendayagunaan dan pendistribusian dana ZIS dengan memanfaatkan sumber daya manusia yang kompeten di bidang ZIS. ZIS sebaiknya dikelola oleh lembaga atau amil yang profesional, akuntabel, amanah dan pengelolaannya harus sesuai dengan ketentuan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Penelitian ini bermaksud untuk menjelaskanpendistribusian dana ZIS melalui program Sanggar GENIUS perspektif UU No. 23 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pengelolaan Zakat. Dalam penelitian ini penulis menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif, dengan menggunakan tiga metode pengumpulan data, yaitu metode observasi partisipan, wawancara tidak terstruktur, dan dokumentasi. Jenis penitian adalah penelitian lapangan dan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis empiris. Untuk menganalisa data, penulis menggunakan teknik deskriptif dengan menggambarkan data secara sistematis dan faktual, sedangkan analisisnya melalui tiga metode: yaitu reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan atau verifikasi. Pengecekan keabsahan data dilakukan menggunakan teknik ketekunan dalam pengamatan, triangulasi, dan perpanjangan keikutsertaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: 1) Program Sanggar GENIUS berbentuk bimbingan belajar gratis matematika dan peningkatan akhlakul karimah, ditujukan kepada anak yatim duafa setingkat SD, tidak menutup kemungkinan anak duafa non-yatim. Sanggar GENIUS kemanfaatannya dapat dirasakan oleh anak yatim. Dana ZIS diserahkan kepada guru sanggar sebagai upah (bisyaroh). Ada pembinaan setiap bulan di kantor Yatim Mandiri Kediri, serta monev yang dilakukan Staf Program setiap tahun sekali dengan mendatangi masing-masing sanggar. 2) Pelaksanaan distribusi dana ZIS melalui program Sanggar GENIUS sudah sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 25 dan Pasal 26 UU No. 23/2011, pelaksanaan program yang tidak melanggar syariat Islam, berdasarkan prioritas mustahik, serta amanah dari donatur/muzaki. Laporan kegiatan pengelolaan zakat, dilakukan secara terpusat oleh Yatim Mandiri pusat setiap akhir tahun. Sesuai dengan PP. No 14 Tahun 2014, Yatim Mandiri melakukan audit syariah dan audit keuangan. Program Sanggar GENIUS membawa kesejahteraan bagi anak-anak binaannya. Selain itu, zakat merupakan salah satu kegiatan untuk menjaga kelima hal pokok yang terkandung dalam dlaruriyah. Lebih spesifiknya sanggar Genius melingkupi penjagaan terhadap agama, jiwa, akal, dan harta benda. Collected ZIS funds can be the best solution of the economy booster and public welfare. Strategic ways can be taken to utilize and distribute ZIS funds by utilizing competent human resources in the ZIS sources of field. ZIS should be managed by a professionalinstitution, accountable, trustworthy and its management must be in accordance with the applicable legal provisions. This study intends to explain the distribution of ZIS funds through the perspective program GENIUS Act No. 23 of 2011 concerning Management of Zakat. In this study the authors used a qualitative approach, using three methods of data collection, they are: participant observation, unstructured interviews, and documentation. The type of research is field study and uses an empirical juridical approach. To analyze data, the author uses descriptive techniques by describing data systematically and factually, while the analysis through three methods: data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion or verification. Checking the validity of the data is done using perseverance techniques in observation, triangulation, and extension of participation.The results showed that: 1) GENIUS Studio program in the form of free mathematics tutoring and improved morality, aimed at orphaned children at the elementary level, do not rule out the possibility of non-orphaned children. The usefulness of GENIUS studio program can be felt by theorphans. ZIS funds are given to the studio teacher as a wage (bisyaroh). There is guidance every month at the Kediri Mandiri Orphanage office, as well as monitoring and evaluation conducted by the Program Staff every year by visiting each studio. 2) The distribution of ZIS funds through the GENIUS Studio program is in accordance with the provisions of Article 25 and Article 26 of Law No. 23/2011, the implementation of programs that do not violate Islamic law, based on priority mustahik, as well as mandate from donors / muzaki. Reports on zakat management activities are carried out centrally by the central Yatim Mandiri at the end of each year. In accordance with PP. No 14 In 2014, Yatim Mandiri conducted sharia audits and financial audits. The GENIUS Studio Program brings prosperity to its assisted children. In addition, zakat is one of the activities to safeguard the five main things contained in dlaruriyah. More specifically the Genius studio covers guarding religion, soul, mind, and property.
Putusan Verstek Pengadilan Agama Pada Cerai Talak Perspektif Keadilan Gender Abdullah Taufik
MAHAKIM Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol 2 No 2 (2018): July 2018
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (206.125 KB) | DOI: 10.30762/mahakim.v2i2.85

Abstract

Verstek’s decision is one of the court legal products that can have permanent legal force if there is no resistance effort (Verzet) from the defendant Verstek’s decision was dropped by a judge because the Tegugat (Respondent) who had been summoned should not come without giving reasons that could be justified by law. The verstek decision is based on article 126 HIR (Herzien Inlandsch Reglement) which states; The absence of the defendant at the first hearing immediately gave the judge the authority to decide on the verstek Resign the session and call the defendant once again Verstek’s decision which is an item of civil procedural law in general is also applied in the civil procedure law of the religious court. Therefore, in dealing with civil divorce cases in religious courts, judges can apply the verstek verdict. negative impact on the wife because in the verstek decision the wife is in a weak position, so that with the verstek verdict she has lost her right to defend herself, even though there is an opportunity to fight (Verzet) but it depends on the quality of the personnel from in terms of economics and education, judges must therefore be wiser in imposing Verstek decisions on divorce divorce cases so that there is an opportunity for the wife to provide information related to her personality so as to create gender equality in the court.
Analisis Keadilan Hukum Putusan Verstek Pada Perkara Cerai Talak No. 0520/Pdt.G/2014/PA. Kab. Kediri Abdullah Taufik
MAHAKIM Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol 3 No 2 (2019): July 2019
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (239.4 KB) | DOI: 10.30762/mahakim.v3i2.99

Abstract

Verstek’s decision is a decision handed down by the judge without the presence of the defendant or respondent at the trial, the principle that the judge is authorized to make a decision or not without the presence of the defendant at the trial so that the judge has facultative rights, in this case referring to article 126 HIR (about verstek) as a reference: 1. The absence of the defendant at the first hearing that authorized the judgeimmediately to decide on the verstek 2. Delay the session and call the defendant once again. In such legal cases / events, the position of the defendant / defendant in the divorce case is always in a weak position, especially if the respondent is a woman, with all her limitations she will always be passive and difficult to provide resistance is most likely caused by the following factors: a. Unclear address; b. The call (relas) for the trial does not arrive; c. Lack of understanding procedures in court proceedings and reluctance to consult; d. More resigned and accept fate