Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesian Journal of Urology Jurnal Keperawatan Muhammadiyah JKKI : Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan Indonesia
Soebadi, Doddy Moesbadianto
Department Of Urology, Faculty Of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
Health Professions Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Peningkatan Pengetahuan Dan Keterampilan Konseling Vasektomi Menggunakan Manekin, Video, Leaflet, Dan Poster Rizalanda, Sofyan; Soebadi, Doddy Moesbadianto; Sustini, Florentina
Jurnal Keperawatan Muhammadiyah 2019: EDISI KHUSUS
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30651/jkm.v4i2.2329

Abstract

Objective: to identify the effect of the use of family planning counseling media on improving vasectomy knowledges and counseling skills.Methods: This article used  quasi-experimental method with a non randomized control group pre test - post test design. The research subjects were 35 male heads of the male family planning group divided into mannequin, video, leaflet, poster, and control group.  Results: Average variable of knowledges of the male family planning group leader before debriefing was 43.66 and after it became 66.86 with average knowledges in the control namely 43.43, leaflet 68.71, poster 68.57, video 74.29, and mannequin 78.29 (p = 0.0001) or smaller than 0.05. While the average variable of counseling skills before debriefing was 26.74 and after it became 84.00 with the average of them were control group 27.43, leaflet 65.14, poster 70.85, video 72.57, and mannequin 71.57, (p = 0,0001) or smaller than 0.05.  Conclusion: The use of family planning counseling medias increase vasectomy knowledges and counseling skills. For knowledges, mannequin is the best media. While the counseling skills, video is the best one.Keywords:  counseling skills, knowledges, media
COMPARISON OF EFFICACY BETWEEN LASER AND PNEUMATIC LITHOTRIPSY FOR URETERAL STONE MANAGEMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS Wicaksono, Dillon Martino; Soebadi, Doddy Moesbadianto; Djatisoesanto, Wahjoe; Rizaldi, Fikri
Indonesian Journal of Urology Vol 28 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Indonesian Urological Association

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32421/juri.v28i2.743

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ureteroscopy lithotripsy (URS) using laser lithotripsy compared to pneumatic lithotripsy for ureteral stone management. Material & Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and ScienceDirect. The search and screening process in this study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guideline to include relevant RCTs. The included studies were assessed for their risks of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool 2 (RoB 2). The comparison of outcomes, which includes stone-free rate, DJ-Stent use, and mean fragmentation time between laser and pneumatic lithotripsy was analyzed using Review Manager 5.4. Results: A total of 11 RCTs evaluating a total of 235 patients with ureteral stone were analyzed in this review. Compared to pneumatic lithotripsy, laser lithotripsy has a significantly higher stone-free rate (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.78-3.21, p < 0.001), longer mean fragmentation time (MD 4.11, 95% CI 3.17-5.04, p < 0.001), and lower DJ stent use rate (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.36-0.76) based on the forest plot analysis. Conclusion: Patients undergoing laser lithotripsy have a higher stone-free rate, a lower DJ stent use rate, and albeit a longer mean fragmentation time compared to pneumatic lithotripsy.
Comparison of meloxicam, tamsulosin and combination of both drugs with 16 Fr and 20 Fr catheter on trial without catheter successfulness in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia Hasroni Fathurrahman; Doddy Moesbadianto Soebadi
JKKI : Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan Indonesia JKKI, Vol 9, No 3, (2018)
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/jkki.vol9.iss3.art4

Abstract

Background: Acute urinary retention, is one of the main complications of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) in elderly patients. Trial Without Catheter (TWOC) is a way to evaluate whether a patient can urinate spontaneously after an episode of urinary retention. Objective: To prove that the combination of meloxicam 15 mg and tamsulosin 0.4 mg orally once daily for three weeks with 20 Fr catheter is more effective in the TWOC successfulness in BPH patients than meloxicam 15 mg or tamsulosin 0.4 mg alone with 16 Fr catheter. Methods: Patients BPH who had the first episode of urinary retention and fulfil the inclusion criteria were randomised. There were six treatment groups (n=6). The treatment group are meloxicam 15 mg + catheter 16 Fr (K1), combination of meloxicam 15 mg and tamsulosin 0.4 mg + catheter 16 Fr (K2), tamsulosin 0.4 mg + catheter 16 Fr (K3), meloxicam 15 mg + catheter 20 Fr (K4), combination of meloxicam 15 mg and tamsulosin 0.4 mg + catheter 20 Fr (K5), tamsulosin 0.4 mg + catheter 20 Fr (K6). For each group, drugs were given orally once daily for seven days. Efficacy of TWOC was assessed by the ability of spontaneous urinary after the first 24 hour post urethral catheter treatment, with Q-max result on uroflowmetry = 5 cc/sec and PVR = 100 cc. Result: All subjects from K1 and K4 experience a recurrent episode of urinary retention (100%), 83.3% in K3 and 66.7% in K6. In the combination group, K2 had 50% incidence of repeat urinary retention, while K5 had16.7%. From the whole group, a statistically significant difference with p <0.05 only can be found in K1 and K5 (p = 0.02).Conclusion: The combination of meloxicam 15 mg and tamsulosin 0.4 mg + 20 Fr catheter had a better effect in TWOC efficacy compared with the meloxicam 15 mg + catheter 16 Fr group.
Co-Authors Florentina Sustini Hasroni Fathurrahman Rizalanda, Sofyan Rizaldi, Fikri wahjoe djatisoesanto Wicaksono, Dillon Martino