Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

SIKAP ASEAN TERHADAP PELANGGARAN HAM DI MYANMAR PASCA KUDETA Ambarwati Ambarwati
Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Sosial Vol 6 No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (386.227 KB) | DOI: 10.38043/jids.v6i1.3360

Abstract

This paper analyzes ASEAN’s attitude toward human rights violence in Myanmar in the post February  2021 military coup. In many cases, ASEAN is often regarded in the dilemmatic position in taking attitude toward human rights violence, a dilemma between consistency in non-interference principle and protection of human rights (responsibility to protect / R2P). ASEAN has a principle of non-interference as a code of conduct in interaction between its members in accordance with Treaty and Amity of Cooperation (TAC). This principle is also applied regarding human rights violence in Myanmar, so that ASEAN is regarded as indecisive and weak. The problem of human rights violence is managed with a dialogue and avoid interventionist way as Western countries do.The method used in this paper is an analysis of descriptive qualitative with exploration some concepts, such as sovereignty, human rights, and responbility to protect. Focused actor in this paper is ASEAN as regional organization and what is to prove in this analysis is that the principle of non-interference is a not weak point of ASEAN, but it is a consistency in its attitude. The organization has been managing its members to respect each other sovereignty in their interactions for 54 years.
Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja, Pengembangan Karier, dan Persepsi Kerja terhadap Kepuasan Kerja dengan Burnout sebagai Pemediasi (Studi Kausal Pangkalan Sarana Operasi Bea dan Cukai) Rahmad Efendi Sembiring; Ambarwati Ambarwati; Musa Alkadhim Alhabshy
SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): SENTRI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Februari 2026
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/sentri.v5i2.5564

Abstract

This study examines the direct and indirect effects of the work environment (X₁), career development (X₂), and work perception (X₃) on job satisfaction (Y), with burnout (Z) serving as a mediating variable. The topic is important because organizational improvements and increasing performance demands may unintentionally intensify psychological strain, particularly in high-risk and high-demand work settings. This research was conducted at the Customs and Excise Operational Facility Base, focusing on patrol boat crew members who face complex operational and emotional challenges. The study employed a quantitative explanatory research design to test causal relationships among variables. The sample consisted of 214 respondents drawn from a population of 458 patrol boat crew members. Primary data were collected through a structured questionnaire using a Likert scale. Data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS), encompassing measurement model evaluation through convergent validity, discriminant validity, and reliability testing using composite reliability and Cronbach’s alpha. Structural model analysis included adjusted R², Q², variance inflation factor (VIF), effect size (F²), model fit, goodness of fit (GOF), and path coefficients, with statistical significance determined by T-statistics greater than 1.96 and p-values below 0.05. The results indicate that the work environment has a positive effect on burnout, while career development and work perception have negative and significant effects on burnout. Burnout negatively affects job satisfaction and fully mediates the relationship between the work environment and job satisfaction, while partially mediating the effects of career development and work perception. Work perception emerged as the strongest predictor of job satisfaction. These findings emphasize the crucial role of burnout as a psychological mechanism and highlight the paradox that modern work environments may increase emotional exhaustion if not balanced with adequate organizational support.