Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

The Effect of Profitability and Audit Opinion on Audit Delay in Construction Sector Companies Listed on The Indonesia Stock Exchange Rifa Ranti Nuraini; Nur Zeina Maya Sari; Uswatun Hasanah
Business Management Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Business Management Mei
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/qehwd744

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of profitability and audit opinion on audit delay in construction sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Audit delay is measured by the number of days between the company’s fiscal year-end and the date of the independent auditor’s report. Profitability is measured using Return on Assets (ROA), while audit opinion is measured using a numerical code, where companies receiving an unqualified opinion are assigned a value of 1 and companies receiving opinions other than unqualified are assigned a value of 0. This study uses a quantitative approach with descriptive and verification methods. The data used are secondary data obtained from annual financial reports and independent auditor reports of construction sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the 2019–2024 period. The sampling technique used is purposive sampling, resulting in 83 observations. The data were analyzed using multiple linear regression with SPSS. The results show that profitability has no significant effect on audit delay, while audit opinion has a negative and significant effect on audit delay. The results show that profitability has no significant effect on audit delay, while audit opinion has a negative and significant effect on audit delay. The F-test result shows that profitability and audit opinion have a significant effect on audit delay. The adjusted R Square value of 0.097 indicates that profitability and audit opinion explain 9.7% of the variation in audit delay, while the remaining 90.3% is explained by other factors outside the model. The descriptive results also show that profitability is relatively low, audit opinion is generally good, and the average audit delay is approximately 86 days.
The Influence Of Return On Assets And Growth Of Assets On Dividend Payout Ratio: A Study On Food & Beverage Sub-Sector Companies Listed On The Indonesia Stock Exchange For The Period 2022–2025 Azmi Fauziah; Uswatun Hasanah; Indri Utami
Indonesian Journal of Innovation Multidisipliner Research Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): April - Juni
Publisher : Institute of Advanced Knowledge and Science

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69693/ijim.v4i2.857

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of Return on Assets (ROA) and Growth of Assets (GA) on Dividend Payout Ratio (DPR) in Food & Beverage sub-sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the 2022–2025 period. The study employed a quantitative approach using descriptive and verificative methods. The population consisted of 83 Food & Beverage sub-sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The sampling technique used purposive sampling, resulting in 13 companies with a total of 52 observations. The data used were secondary data obtained from annual financial statements and analyzed using panel data regression with EViews 12 software. Based on the Chow Test and Hausman Test results, the most appropriate estimation model was the Fixed Effect Model (FEM). Classical assumption tests included heteroscedasticity and multicollinearity tests. The results indicate that Return on Assets partially has a negative and significant effect on Dividend Payout Ratio with a probability value of 0.0103 < 0.05. This finding suggests that higher profitability tends to reduce dividend distribution because companies prioritize retained earnings for internal financing purposes. Meanwhile, Growth of Assets has no significant effect on Dividend Payout Ratio with a probability value of 0.0866 > 0.05. Simultaneously, ROA and GA variables are able to explain 87.41% of the variation in DPR, while the remaining percentage is influenced by other variables outside the research model.