Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

AN ACOUSTICAL CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS OF SUNDANESE CENTRAL VOWELS Yusup Irawan
Sirok Bastra Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Sirok Bastra
Publisher : Kantor Bahasa Provinsi Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1225.719 KB) | DOI: 10.37671/sb.v1i2.19

Abstract

The first, this research is intended to identify acoustic profiles of the two central vowels in Sundanese, viz  /ə/ and /ö/. The second, this research is intended to searches the acoustic contrasts between the two vowels. Experimental method was applied in this research. The result shows that vowel /ə/ has higher first fromant (F1) than vowel /ö/ both at opened syllable and at closed syllable. However, for the other acoustic properties—the second formant (F2), fundamental frequency (Fo), duration (ms), and intensity (dB)—vowel /ö/ has higher acoustic values than vowel /ə/. In correlation with the second research objective, viz to search acoustic properties which contrast the two central vowels, it’s found that all acoustic properties (F1, F2, Fo, duration and intensity) contrast the two Sundanese central vowels. All statistical tests which were applied show the results that there are significant differences of the acoustic properties between both central vowels.
PHONETIC GRAMMAR OF PLOSIVES SOUNDS SPOKEN BY SUNDANESE AND JAVANESE Yusup Irawan; NFN Riani
Widyaparwa Vol 49, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Balai Bahasa Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (380.46 KB) | DOI: 10.26499/wdprw.v49i1.802

Abstract

This study aims to identify “the phonetic grammar" of voiced plosive sounds [b, d, and g] and voiceless [p, t, and k] at the initial position of the words uttered by two different groups of native speakers: Sundanese and Java. These sounds are phonemically the same phonemes in Sundanese, Javanese and Indonesian. The findings show that the two groups of native speakers realize different and the same VOT (Voice Onset Time) pattern of popping sounds. For sounds voiced plosives or lenis plosive [b, d, and g], Sundanese speakers realize it with a negative VOT pattern, while Javanese speakers do it with a positive VOT pattern. Then, voiced plosive sounds uttered by Javanese speakers tend to be "aspirated" or breathy. For the voiceless plosives or fortis plosives [p, t, and k], the two groups of speakers pronounce them in the same pattern, namely the positive VOT pattern, and even tend to have zero VOT. The VOT patterns reflect aspirated voiced and voiceless phonation categories for Javanese and voiced and voiceless for Sundanese.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi gramatika fonetik “phonetic grammar” bunyi-bunyi letupan bersuara [b, d, dan g] dan tak bersuara [p,t, dan k]  pada posisi awal kata yang diucapkan oleh dua kelompok penutur jati yang  berbeda: Sunda dan Jawa. Bunyi-bunyi itu secara fonemik merupakan fonem yang sama dalam bahasa Sunda, Jawa, dan Indonesia. Temuan dalam penelitian ini adalah kedua kelompok  penutur jati merealisasikan pola VOT (voice onset time) bunyi letupan yang berbeda dan sama. Untuk bunyi-bunyi bersuara plosive lenis  [b, d, dan g] penutur bahasa Sunda merealisasikannya dengan pola VOT negatif, sedangkan penutur bahasa Jawa merealisasikannya dengan pola VOT positif. Kemudian bunyi-bunyi letupan bersuara yang diucapkan oleh penutur bahasa Jawa cenderung “beraspirasi” atau breathy. Pada bunyi-bunyi takbersuara atau plosive fortis  [p, t, dan k], kedua kelompok penutur mengucapkannya dengan pola yang sama, yakni pola VOT positif bahkan cenderung ber-VOT nol atau zero. Pola-pola VOT itu merefleksikan kategori fonasi bersuara breathy dan takbesuara untuk bahasa Jawa dan bersuara dan tak bersuara untuk bahasa Sunda.
Analisis Wacana Kritis Upaya Privatisasi dan Komersialisasi Mata Air dalam Surat Permohonan Izin Pengusahaan Air Yusup Irawan; Hestiyana Hestiyana
Aksara Vol 34, No 2 (2022): AKSARA, EDISI DESEMBER 2022
Publisher : Balai Bahasa Provinsi Bali

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29255/aksara.v34i2.990.167--180

Abstract

This qualitative study aims to describe linguistic signs and reveal the ideology contained in CV. STB’letter for water exploitation to policy makers in West Bandung Regency. This research uses Halliday’s (1995) transitivity analysis and Fairclough's (1995) critical discourse analysis. At the linguistic analysis, it was identified that the material process transivity is most often used by CV. STB for positive imaging. At the interpretation analysis, it was identified that CV. STB as the applicant for water exploitation (1) claiming to have the obligation to exploit water which is marked by the relasional verb process, (2) self-image with a social spirit which is marked by the material verb process, and (3) self-image as a humble applicant with linguistic signs of mental processes. At the explanation stage, it was revealed that CV. STB has the ideology that (1) the water resources in the soil itself are privately owned, (2) the water concession permit will be issued if CV. STB makes "benevolence" to the community and (3) needs to create community dependence for hegemony over water resources. The implication of this research is that the privatization and commercialization of natural resources in this context is built with the practice of imaging discourse. Therefore, policy holders must be careful in granting water concession permits and the affected communities must also be critical. AbstrakPenelitian kualitatif ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan tanda-tanda linguistik dan mengungkapkan ideologi yang terkandung dalam sebuah surat permohonan pengusahaan air CV. STB kepada para pengambil kebijakan di Kabupaten Bandung Barat. Penelitian menggunakan kajian analisis transitivitas (Halliday, 1994) dan analisis wacana kritis model Fairclough (1995). Pada tahapan analisis linguistik, teridentifikasi bahwa transitivitas proses material paling sering digunakan oleh CV. STB untuk pencitraan positif. Pada tahapan interpretasi, teridentifikasi bahwa CV. STB sebagai pemohon pengusahaan air (1) mengklaim memiliki kewajiban mengeksploitasi air yg ditandai proses verba relasional, (2) mencitrakan diri berjiwa sosial yang ditandai dengan proses verba material, dan (3) mencitrakan diri sebagai pemohon yang merendah dengan tanda linguistik proses mental. Pada tahapan eksplanasi, terungkap bahwa CV. STB memiliki ideologi bahwa (1) sumber daya air dalam tanah sendiri adalah milik pribadi, (2) izin pengusahaan air akan keluar jika CV. STB membuat “kebajikan” kepada masyarakat, dan (3) perlu menciptakan ketergantungan masyarakat untuk menghegemoni sumber daya air. Implikasi dari penelitian ini adalah privatisasi dan komersialisasi sumber daya air dalam konteks ini dibangun dengan praktik wacana pencitraan. Oleh karena itu, pemegang kebijakan harus berhati-hati dalam memberikan izin pengusahaan air dan masyarakat yang terdampak pun harus bersikap kritis.