Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

KEKUATAN HUKUM PUTUSAN PERDAMAIAN BPSK APABILA SURAT PERJANJIAN DAMAI TIDAK DISEPAKATI SALAH SATU PIHAK (Studi Putusan BPSK Nomor 011/P.BPSK/10/2017 ) Adellia Sallwa Baqa Rizki
Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Juni 2018
Publisher : Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Adellia Sallwa Baqa Rizki, M. Hamidi Masykur, SH., M.Kn., Setiawan Wicaksono, S.H., M.Kn. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya Jalan MT. Haryono No. 169, Malang 65145, Indonesia Telp: +62-341-553898, Fax: +62-341-566505 Email : adelliasallwa@gmail.com   ABSTRAK Dalam penulisan skripsi ini penulis membahas Kekuatan Hukum Putusan Mediasi Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) apabila Surat Perjanjian Damai tidak ditandatangani oleh Salah Satu Pihak. Hal ini dilatar belakangi dengan amar putusan BPSK yang mengatakan bahwa putusan bersifat final dan mengikat, sedangkan Surat Perjanjian Damai tidak ditandatangani oleh salah satu pihak. Dalam hal ini timbul ketidakpastian hukum dalam berlakunya putusan tersebut. Untuk menjawab permasalahan diatas, penelitian hukum normatif menggunakan metode pendekatan perundang-undangan, dan pendekatan kasus. Bahan-bahan hukum yang diperoleh dianalisis dengan metode analisa kualitatif dan metode deduktif sehingga dapat disajikan dalam penulisan yang lebih sistematis guna menjawab isu hukum yang telah dirumuskan. Maka kekuatan hukum dari putusan BPSK No. 011/P.BPSK/10/217 dikaitkan dengan ketentuan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen, serta Keputusan Meneteri Perindustrian dan Perdagangan tentang Pelaksanaan Tugas dan Kewenangan BPSK adalah cacat dan dapat dibatalkan. dalam hal ini penulis mengarahkan bahwa upaya hukum yang dapat ditempuh adalah mengajukan ke pengadilan negeri seperti pada perkara perdata biasa. Kata kunci : Kekuatan Hukum, Putusan, Surat Perjanjian Damai ABSTRACT The issue discussed in this research is based on the Decision by Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (further stated as BPSK) which suggests that the decision is final and binding, while the reconciliation agreement is not signed by one of the parties involved. This issue triggers legal uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of the decision. This research employed normative legal research along with a case and statute approaches, in which the legal force of the Decision of BPSK Number 011/P.BPSK/10/217 is related to the provision of Civil Code, the Law of Consumer Protection, and the Decision of Industry and Commerce Minister on Obligations and Authorities of BPSK. Keywords: legal force, decision, reconciliation agreement 
Analisa Hukum Terhadap Pengaturan Hak Guna Usaha di Ibu Kota Negara Retno Ayuningtyas, Tri; Nisfu Laila Indah Septiana; Adellia Sallwa Baqa Rizki; Icmi Ag Rohmah; Made Sarmila
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2149

Abstract

Indonesia has a 2045 Golden Indonesia Vision, which is to become a “Sovereign, Advanced and Sustainable Archipelago”. To realize Indonesia's economic target 2045, the Government is moving the National Capital City (hereinafter referred to as IKN) as one of the strategies to realize Indonesia's economic target 2045, namely more inclusive and equitable economic growth through accelerated development of Eastern Indonesia. The relocation of the National Capital from Java Island to Kalimantan Island is one of the efforts to encourage regional equity so as to reduce the gap between Eastern Indonesia (KTI) and Western Indonesia (KBI), especially between the Java Region and outside the Java Region. IKN is one of the National Strategic Plans whose development is carried out in Sepaku, North Penajam Paser Regency. To build a new city, the government needs to have a strategy to attract investors both from within and outside the country. One of the business strategies that will be provided by the government is the granting of 2 (two) HGU cycles with a period of up to 190 years. The granting of such a long period of rights is not accompanied by arrangements to revoke/remove the rights that have been granted. This is considered contrary to the HGU arrangement in Law No. 5 of 1960 Basic Agrarian Principles Regulation
Analisa Hukum Terhadap Pengaturan Hak Guna Usaha di Ibu Kota Negara Retno Ayuningtyas, Tri; Nisfu Laila Indah Septiana; Adellia Sallwa Baqa Rizki; Icmi Ag Rohmah; Made Sarmila
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2149

Abstract

Indonesia has a 2045 Golden Indonesia Vision, which is to become a “Sovereign, Advanced and Sustainable Archipelago”. To realize Indonesia's economic target 2045, the Government is moving the National Capital City (hereinafter referred to as IKN) as one of the strategies to realize Indonesia's economic target 2045, namely more inclusive and equitable economic growth through accelerated development of Eastern Indonesia. The relocation of the National Capital from Java Island to Kalimantan Island is one of the efforts to encourage regional equity so as to reduce the gap between Eastern Indonesia (KTI) and Western Indonesia (KBI), especially between the Java Region and outside the Java Region. IKN is one of the National Strategic Plans whose development is carried out in Sepaku, North Penajam Paser Regency. To build a new city, the government needs to have a strategy to attract investors both from within and outside the country. One of the business strategies that will be provided by the government is the granting of 2 (two) HGU cycles with a period of up to 190 years. The granting of such a long period of rights is not accompanied by arrangements to revoke/remove the rights that have been granted. This is considered contrary to the HGU arrangement in Law No. 5 of 1960 Basic Agrarian Principles Regulation