Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA ASET DESA ANTARA PEMERINTAH DESA TUGUREJO KECAMATAN NGASEM DENGAN PEMERINTAH KABUPATEN KEDIRI (Studi Implementasi Pasal 76 ayat (5) Undang-Undang RI Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa di Badan Pengelelola Keuangan dan Aset Desa Kabupat Yusti Merilistia
Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Maret 2019
Publisher : Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Yusti Merilistia, Prof. Dr. Sudarsono, S.H. M.S., Herlin Wijayati, S.H., M.H., Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya yustiyustia@gmail.com  ABSTRAK Pemerintah Desa memiliki kekayaan/ Aset untuk mendukung penyelenggaraan pemerintahannya. Kekayaan atau aset desa merupakan salah satu sumber penerimaan desa yang harus dikelola dan dikembangkan keberadaannya. Aset desa semakin beragam dan banyak, sehingga alternatif sumber penerimaan desa pun juga semakin banyak. Seiring dengan berlakunya UU tentang Desa dan adanya pengakuan dari UUD NRI 1945, kedudukan Desa yang berubah menjadi lebih kuat, diharapkan desa akan lebih mandiri untuk menuju kepada kemandirian desa. Berdasarkan paparan tersebut membuat Pemdes yang ada di Kediri bersengketa dengan Pemda Kab Kediri karena kekayaan/aset yang digunakan dan telah diserahkan kepada Pemda Kab Kediri sebelumnya, untuk dikembalikan kepada desa. Dilatar belakangi karena fenomena sengketa kekayaan/aset pada desa inilah yang menyebabkan  permasalahan, sengketa. Dan untuk mengetahui serta meneliti penyelesaian sengketa tersebut melalui upaya seperti apa yang diterapkan oleh kedua belah pihak dalam  memilih penyelesaian sengketa terkait aset desa tersebut. Adapun penelitian  ini digunakan adalah Yuridis Sosiologis yang mengkaji Implementasi antara hukum di lapangan, Bahan hukum primer, dan sekunder yang diperoleh dianalisis dengan menggunakan teknik analisis deskriptif kualitatif. Kata Kunci: Penyelesaian Sengketa, aset desa, pemerintah desa   ABSTRACT Village governments have their own assets coming from local revenues to support the development of their regions. The village assets are getting more varied and so are the sources of the revenues. Since the implementation of Act concerning Village and the recognition of the regulation by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, villages are getting stronger. It is expected that villages could be more independent. However, this condition has brought the local government of the Regency of Kediri and the village government of Kediri to dispute over village assets since the authorities given to the local government of the Regency over the assets should now be given back to the village Head. This research studies the measures that should be taken to settle the dispute, which employed socio-juridical method that looks into the implementation of the law in the field. Primary and secondary legal materials obtained were analysed in qualitative descriptive method. Keywords: dispute Settlement, village assets, village govenrment
LEGAL PROTECTION FOR APPEARERS WHEN THE NOTARY'S EXISTENCE IS UNKNOWN (AFWEZEGHEID) Yusti Merilistia; Istislam; Yenni Eta Widyanti
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 3 No. 6 (2023): November
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v3i6.1146

Abstract

This research examines the legal protection of clients when the notary's whereabouts are unknown (afwezigheid). describe and analyze the certainty of legal protection for appearers who are harmed by a notary whose whereabouts are unknown afwezigheid and to analyze and formulate forms of legal protection that can guarantee legal certainty for appearers who are harmed by a notary whose whereabouts are unknown afwezigheid.This research is a normative juridical research through literature study using statutory approach (statute approach) and conceptual approach (conceptual approach). The main issues were analyzed using primary legal materials includingProvisions of Article 463 in conjunction with Article 467 of the Civil Code, provisions of Article 15, Article 16, Article 17, Article 62, Article 63 Article 67, Article 69 and Article 70 of Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary Public juncto Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary, Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia Number 15 of 2020 concerning Procedures for Examining the Supervisory Board of Notaries and Notary Code of Ethics. Legal materials were analyzed based on prescriptive analysis and grammatical and systematic interpretation techniques. Based on the research results it is known thatLegal protection for appearers who are harmed by a notary whose whereabouts are unknown afwezigheid based on the analysis of UUJN Amendment) is weak, because basically (“UUJN”) juncto (“UUJN”) Amendment has accommodated arrangements regarding the presence of a notary in the exercise of his office.
Legal Protection for Appearers when the Notary's Existence is Unknown (Lost Contact) Yusti Merilistia; Istislam; Yenny Eta Widyanti
Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani Vol. 3 No. 5 (2023): May, 2023
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/mudima.v3i5.3805

Abstract

This research examines the legal protection of clients when the notary's wherea-bouts are unknown (lost contact).describe and analyze the certainty of legal protection for appearers who are harmed by a notary whose whereabouts are unknown (lost contact) and to analyze and formulate forms of legal protection that can guarantee legal certainty for ap-pearers who are harmed by a notary whose whereabouts are unknown (lost contact).This research is a normative juridical research through literature studyusing statutory approach (statute approach) and conceptual approach (conceptual approach). The main issues were analyzed using primary legal materials includingProvisions of Article 463 in conjunction with Article 467 of the Civil Code, provisions of Article 15, Article 16, Article 17, Article 62, Article 63 Article 67, Article 69 and Article 70 of Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary Public juncto Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary, Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia Number 15 of 2020 concerning Procedures for Examining the Supervisory Board of Notaries and Notary Code of Ethics. Legal materials were analyzed based on prescriptive analysis and grammatical and systematic interpretation techniques. Based on the research results it is known thatLegal protection for appearers who are harmed by a notary whose whereabouts are unknown (lost contact) based on the analysis of UUJN Amendment) is weak, because basically (“UUJN”) juncto (“UUJN”) Amendment has accommodated arrangements regarding the presence of a notary in the exercise of his office. No matter of how, there are incomplete norms in regulating the absence of a notary in Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Notary office  (“UUJN”) juncto (“UUJN”) Amend-ment because it cannot accommodate the existence of a notary whose whereabouts are un-known (lost contact), including not being able to guarantee legal protection to appearers who are disadvantaged because the event of absence of a notary is not contained in the provisions in UUJN juncto UUJN Amendment which is used as a guideline results in legal uncertainty which causes legal protection for aggrieved appearers to be also not guaranteed