Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Jaminan Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah Fery Rochmad Ramadhan
Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, September 2020
Publisher : Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Fery Rochmad Ramadhan, Muhammad Dahlan, Ibnu Sam Widodo Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya Jl. MT. Haryono No. 169 Malang e-mail :ferygood.us@gmail.com ABSTRAK Peraturan daerah merupakan bagian dari pelaksanaan prinsip negara hukum dalam UUDNRI 1945. Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 dan perubahannya dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2019 memberikan  hak partisipasi masyarakat dalam pembentukannya. Partisipasi masyarakat dalam pembentukan daerah harus dibentuk dengan memperhatikan prinsip transparansi dan partisipatif, dalam membentuk model partisipasi yang memenuhi prinsip tersebut tulisan ini melakukan analisa perbandingan model partisipasi dalam pembentukan hukum dengan beberapa negara Bosnia and Herzegovina, Hungaria, Afrika Selatan, dan  Finlandia. Perbandingan ditujukan untuk membentuk konsep partisipasi masyarakat yang partisipatif, transparan dan menekankan posisi masyarakat sebagai mitra pemerintah sebagai manifestasi “citizen power”. Konsep partisipasi meliputi partisipasi dalam pra-legislasi, legislasi, dan evaluasi. Kata kunci : Peraturan Daerah, Partisipasi Masyarakat, Transparansi, citizen power   ABSTRACT Local regulations are part of the enforcement of the state principle of the 1945 Indonesian Constitution. Establishment of Local Regulations in Law Number 12 of 2011 and its amendment in Law Number 5 of 2019 governs the right of the people to participate in the establishment. The encouragement of the participation should take into account transparency and participative principle. To find out more regarding this issue, this research also analysed the comparison between the model of participation involved in the establishment of law and that in several countries like Bosnia, Herzegovina, Hungary, South Africa, and Finland. This comparative approach is intended to form the concept of participation of people that is transparent and to emphasise the position of the people as government’s partners as a manifestation of “citizen power”. The concept of participation comprises the participation in pre-legislation, legislation, and evaluation. Keywords: local regulation, people’s participation, transparency, citizen power
EVALUATING THE ROLE OF RELATIVE COMPETENCE IN LIMITING JUSTICE ACCESSIBILITY BEFORE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS. Fery Rochmad Ramadhan; Tunggul Anshari Setia Negara; Shinta Hadiyantina
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): November
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4671

Abstract

The Administrative Court Procedure Law, as set out in Law Number 5 of 1986 and amended by Law Number 51 of 2009, aims to balance the inherently “unequal positions of claimants and government defendants”. Yet Indonesia’s extensive geography and shifting authority following the Job Creation Law have effectively centralized challenges to central government administrative decisions in Jakarta. Although the Administrative Court adheres to the actor sequitur forum rei principle, Article 54(4) provides for exceptions through a open legal policy by making “Peraturan Pemerintah” that has never been issued. This regulatory vacuum undermines access to justice, as claimants face strict filing deadlines, mandatory administrative effort, and significant geographical barriers. The absence of the mandated regulation reveals a broader disharmony in the legal framework and suggests governmental reluctance to establish venue rules that would facilitate citizen access to judicial review. Critical analysis with other jurisdictions demonstrates that relative competence rules can be structured to account for the nature of governmental acts, the extent of public harm, and the imperative of ensuring meaningful access to justice.